David Brussat, Dr. Downtown: Hallucinogens in Kennedy Plaza

David Brussat, GoLocalProv Dr. Downtown

David Brussat, Dr. Downtown: Hallucinogens in Kennedy Plaza

Kennedy Plaza, Photo by David Brussat
The “upgraded” Kennedy Plaza reopened last week. Riders returned to await buses in the ugly, sterile, glass-and-steel shelters that replace elegant Art Nouveau waiting kiosks. Between the two lines of new shelters along the edges of a widened plaza is an empty hardscape destined to become, says Mayor Elorza, a “vibrant urban gathering center.”

Most of the famously unkempt crowds of ne’er-do-wells prosecuting a lively commerce in illegal substances while hassling those awaiting buses in days of yore will be back. The chess players, concert goers and farmers envisioned by Elorza will no doubt be more emboldened to beard the scofflaws in the new dispensation than they used to be, and this will cause money for future improvements to fall from the new trees that have displaced the former ice-melt system.

Well, I spent one or two evenings a week over the past five years waiting for my bus on the old plaza, getting off it and walking through it in the mornings. I walked through it for decades before that. And while the eyes of a veteran journalist may be suspect, I never  noticed anyone selling drugs or bothering the innocent. Perps like to avoid arousing the notice of potential witnesses. Lots of scruffy, even unfashionable threads, to be sure. Now and then a less-than-dulcet voice pitched in anger or dismay. And some high-schoolers rough-housing in the afternoon. No matter that the danger was mostly a fiction - more a stand-in for class anxieties - its survival in the public mind will limit the prospects for a lively civic square, even if it were more attractive.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Notwithstanding all that, Journal reporter Mark Reynolds wrote that he discerned in the redesign “a greater focus on aesthetics.” So maybe they are selling hallucinogens in the plaza.

Providence’s “moribund” renaissance?

Downcity shoppers. Courtesy of pinterest.com:
It would be unfair to judge downtown’s revival by strolling through on a cold Saturday, as did the redoubtable Mary Ann Sorrentino. Her piece in the Jan. 11 Journal, “Walking through our moribund ‘renaissance’ city,” fondly recalled her memory of shopping downtown on streets filled with pedestrians. Old photographs back her up. 

But the renaissance is real, and the downtown is probably as crowded with people as it used to be, if not more so. They are doing different things, and they are more spread throughout the day, but they are there. I’ve seen crowded downtown streets many times, often on days of celebration or when some sporting event or performance is in town. In the dead of winter? Not so much.

But while most of the shops have indeed vanished from Downcity, you can find stores in greater abundance at Providence Place than in the days of yore. True, the mall is not in Downcity. Still, there are a lot more restaurants (with much better food), nightclubs, galleries and venues for live performances in Downcity now than there were. Patrons are generally inside for longer stretches than are the customers of shops, and spend less time literally “on the street.” And don’t forget that downtown is now a residential neighborhood, which it never was in the good ol’ days.

If you put all of these people out on the street at once, they would take some of the sadness out of the Sorrentinian countenance.

The Buddy System

Buddy Cianci, courtesy of 606282.xobor.com:
Even if Kennedy Plaza is going backwards, the Providence renaissance has been a remarkable success. Burying railroad tracks and uncovering rivers created a waterfront and parks linked by river walks and spanned by a dozen new bridges, all inspired by and hence augmenting the city’s architectural heritage, adding up to a beauty that any city would covet.

The real unfairness in Sorrentino’s column was to ignore the problem that the renaissance had to address. Suburban flight had long ago hurt downtown, so city fathers came up, in 1960, with a plan of revival called Downtown Providence 1970. Basically, the idea was to use urban renewal to make the city uglier. Westminster Mall and Weybosset Hill were both turned into dead zones.

The plan’s predictable belly flop was followed by Buddy Cianci’s first administration. What did he do? He started to restore the old facades. But he also lifted the residency requirement for city workers, increased the city’s property tax and instituted an inventory tax on businesses. These policies sent homeowners and businesses fleeing the city, bolstering the population, commerce and revenues of Cranston, Johnston, North Providence and other suburbs. 

Why? The only plausible explanation is that Buddy wanted to run for governor, and sought to turn city voters into statewide voters. That didn’t work either. But in this case, justice was not poetic. Buddy lost to Gov. Joseph Garrahy in 1980, remained in City Hall, left, returned, left again, and finally tried to return again. That, parse it how you will, is history.


The Best and Worst of Providence: How we Rank

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.