LEGAL MATTERS: LinkedIn-- Aggressive Marketing or Hacking?

John T. Longo, GoLocalProv Legal Contributor

LEGAL MATTERS: LinkedIn-- Aggressive Marketing or Hacking?

When does aggressive marketing become hacking? A federal court in California is wrestling with that issue right now in a lawsuit brought by a disgruntled former LinkedIn user. The plaintiff claims LinkedIn hacked into his computer, found every e-mail address in it, then bombarded the people with spam disguised as e-mail from him. LinkedIn says it was just helping him grow his professional network and prosper. (Why don’t companies just admit they do things to make a buck? There is nothing wrong with that and it would really help their credibility.)

The lawsuit is rooted in LinkedIn’s “optimization initiatives” designed to grow the site’s membership. One of the initiatives was aggressively pressing new members to invite their friends to also join LinkedIn. If the new user agreed, LinkedIn’s computers would troll the new member’s computer and identify all the new member’s contacts. LinkedIn’s computers would then send the contacts an e-mail inviting them to join. According to the lawsuit, the problems were:

  • The e-mail looked like it was from the new member – not LinkedIn’s marketing computers. That often kept it from getting flagged as spam as the recipients probably would have preferred.
  • If the recipients did not join LinkedIn right away, LinkedIn’s computers would send follow up e-mails further annoying the recipients and embarrassing the new member whose email account LinkedIn appeared to be using.
  • LinkedIn’s computers could send the e-mails to anyone in the new member’s Google contact list which included anyone the new member ever sent an e-mail to and everyone they received an e-mail from - not just people they had consciously added to their contact list. So a junior employee who signed up for LinkedIn could have unwittingly allowed LinkedIn to send a bunch of e-mails to his or her boss pitching them to buy a LinkedIn membership. (Not something that is likely to earn you points with the boss.)
  • LinkedIn did not make it easy for the hoodwinked new member to stop the e-mails once he or she realized what was going on.

LinkedIn has responded to the lawsuit by basically saying ‘what’s the big deal, they [the new members] checked the “allow” box.’ That may win them the lawsuit but it won’t win them much trust.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

The New York Times wrote an excellent store about the lawsuit when it was filed in September and the Courthouse News Service has an updated article about LinkedIn’s effort to have it thrown out this month.

John Longo is a consumer rights attorney practicing law in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. He represents consumers who have disputes with businesses, employees cheated out of their wages or overtime, car buyers stuck with Lemons, and people in need of bankruptcy protection. He is a member of theNational Association of Consumer Advocates, theNational Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, and the Rhode Island Association for Justice.

Natural Disasters: RI's Most At Risk and Vulnerable Communities

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.