WPRI Reporter Calls Out Providence Journal for Plagiarism - 2nd Time in 10 Days

GoLocalProv News Team

WPRI Reporter Calls Out Providence Journal for Plagiarism - 2nd Time in 10 Days

The Providence Journal has been called out for plagiarism for the second time in two weeks for lifting another news organization's journalism.

On Tuesday, in the midst of the breaking Gordon Fox plea on federal crimes, a WPRI-12 political reporter called out the Providence Journal in a tweet for copying word for word a paragraph of a WPRI article that had been published earlier that morning. The Providence Journal had copied one entire paragraph of the WPRI story.

The Tweet by Ted Nesi at 9:15 am included the two clips with the identical language, “These two final paragraphs look awfully similar, @Projo…” 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

This is the second time in the past ten days the Providence Journal has been called out by a competing news organization for plagiarism.  On February 22, GoLocalProv reported that GoLocal’s lawyers had filed a complaint with the legal counsel of the Providence Journal’s parent company, GateHouse Media, for “free riding” on GoLocalProv’s journalism.

Cuts at GateHouse

GateHouse media purchased the Providence Journal from A.H. Belo in 2014, just one year after GateHouse (in a new corporate structure) emerged from a 2013 bankruptcy.

Since the acquisition of Providence Journal, GateHouse has also acquired Halifax Media (which includes the Worcester Telegram). 

According to GateHouse’s corporate website, the company owns 78 daily newspapers with total paid circulation of approximately 547,000 and 235 weekly newspapers (published up to three times per week) with total paid circulation of approximately 282,000 and total free circulation of approximately 706,000.

GateHouse has implemented significant cuts at the Providence Journal including eliminating the copy editing staff in Providence, with the responsibilities being transferred to Austin, Texas.

As previously reported by the New York-based GateHouse Media has denied the GoLocal claims. In a series of letters between the Providence-based GoLocal24 and GateHouse’s attorney, GateHouse refuted GoLocal’s claims. 

Vice President, Secretary General Counsel Polly Grunfield Sack of GateHouse Media said, “We emphatically disagree with all the preposterous allegations made in your letter. I have reviewed the GoLocalProv reportage about the threatened strike by the school bus drivers for the city of Providence as well as the Providence Journal's coverage of the matter.  Both GoLocalProv and the Providence Journal are reporting on the same situation.”

GoLocal’s lawyers had called out GateHouse for “free-riding.”

“The Providence Journal’s free-riding comes at a significant cost to GoLocalProv.  Like most sites of its kind, GoLocalProv’s revenues are derived from advertising, and advertisers pay for page views.  By failing to attribute the story to GoLocalProv, among other things, the Providence Journal deprived GoLocalProv of revenue-generating page views; robbed GoLocalProv of the publicity and attention associated with breaking an important news story; and unjustly enriched itself by page views that should have gone to GoLocalProv,” wrote Rachelle Green, a partner in the Providence-based law firm Duffy and Sweeney in a letter to GateHouse Media, the parent company of the Providence Journal.


Moore News

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.