3 Investigative Hearings on Washington Bridge Have Failed to Produce Any Action

GoLocalProv News Team

3 Investigative Hearings on Washington Bridge Have Failed to Produce Any Action

RIDOT Director Peter Alviti PHOTO: State House Feed
A week from tomorrow, it will have been two years since the state was thrust into chaos when Rhode Island Department of Transportation Director Peter Alviti announced the closure of the Washington Bridge — one of the East Coast's major thoroughfares.

The failure led to months of delays and frustration on Rhode Island’s roads and devastated many businesses.

In February 2024, the Rhode Island General Assembly held its first of three hearings on the Washington Bridge’s failure.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

“We can’t take any action — all we can do is expose. We don’t have any disciplinary [authority] to hire or fire, like any oversight meeting,” said House Oversight Committee Chair Rep. Patricia Serpa, in a lengthy interview with GoLocal in February of 2024.  Serpa, a Democrat, represents District 27 and parts of West Warwick, Coventry, and Warwick.

The late Senate President Dominick Ruggerio, along with House Speaker Joe Shekarchi, have been political allies of Alviti.

Ruggerio and Alviti worked together for the Laborers' International Union for 15 years. And Shekarchi was critical to Alviti being appointed to the position. Shekarchi served as chair of former Governor Gina Raimondo’s transition committee after she was first elected in 2014. Alviti has served as RIDOT director since 2015.

A second hearing was held about one year later — in February 2025. That hearing came under criticism for the failure to hire outside counsel, or for having hired technical experts to assist the investigation. That hearing also came under criticism for a lack of preparation.

After the hearing, Ken Block blasted the General Assembly’s failure:

The oversight committee should have asked questions like: “Who at RIDOT was responsible for testing and accepting work on the failed Washington Bridge over the last ten years?” “Show us the documentation for the testing performed for all work done on that bridge.” “Can RIDOT say with certainty that the materials used in our road and bridge construction, things like concrete and asphalt, are of the proper quality? Did RIDOT employees perform these tests? If not, why?”

This bridge did not experience a sudden, catastrophic event that caused its demise, as Director Alviti claims happened when he said a “large truck” broke the bridge. He knew this bridge was in trouble since he became Director in 2016. The evidence is in the public record. If a large truck did break the bridge, should the bridge have been posted to prohibit those large trucks from using it, as was suggested by RIDOT contractors in 2012, 2015, and 2016?

The decay evident throughout the failed bridge did not happen overnight. It was decades in the making—all under the nose of the RIDOT.

 

Third Hearing

Last month, legislative leaders held their third oversight hearing into the Washington Bridge failure. This time, the legislature hired former U.S. Attorney Zachary Cunha.

While Cunha's questioning of Alviti was more vigorous than in the previous hearings, much of the time was taken up by Alviti repeating canned answers that were non-responsive to Cunha’s questions.

The House Oversight Committee is chaired by Serpa, and the Senate Oversight Committee chair, Mark McKenney, allowed Alviti to consume the clock without interruption.

 

Is There a Report?

On Monday, GoLocal asked Shekarchi’s office if there was a report and findings from the three hearings.

After repeated follow-up, a joint statement was issued by Shekarchi’s office in conjunction with Senate President Val Lawson.  She had cleared the way for Alviti to get a raise.

The statement said:

The House and Senate Oversight Committees are waiting for the transcripts from the hearing, and they also are seeking additional information from DOT and the Administration as a follow-up to the hearing.   

Once received, the committees will determine next steps, including the issuance of any report and the timing of further meetings.   


Washington Bridge Failure Timeline

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.