Brown Issues Statement to Correct “Misinformation” Regarding Campus Assault Case

GoLocalProv News Team

Brown Issues Statement to Correct “Misinformation” Regarding Campus Assault Case

Brown University issued a statement Sunday evening seeking to correct what it called “misinformation” regarding incidents at an unauthorized party in a fraternity last fall.

According to the statement, “Over the past week students, alumni, and former student organizations have widely disseminated their own communications, much of it inaccurate or incomplete.” 

“While our preference, out of respect for the privacy of the involved individuals, would be to issue no further statements about this case, we recognize that misinformation and rumors are harmful to students and must be corrected.”

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

The statement, issued by Russell Carey, Executive Vice President for Planning and Policy and Margaret Klawunn, Vice President for Campus Life and Student Services, went on to describe what it called the facts of the case:


-In the fall, two students reported that they were given alcoholic punch containing a date rape drug at the unauthorized party at Phi Kappa Psi. Subsequent to that report two drug tests were performed by two different external laboratories; a urine test for one student and a hair test for one student.

-Brown was initially told by the first laboratory that the urine test confirmed the presence of exogenous (not naturally occurring) GHB (gamma hydroxybutyrate). We reported that information to the community on November 8. However, upon subsequent investigation and review by an independent medical expert, this laboratory revised its assessment and concluded that the level of GHB was low enough to be consistent with endogenous (naturally occurring) GHB. We have been told that the laboratory has since suspended conducting this particular test. The revision in the laboratory’s assessment made clear that the test they conducted neither proved nor disproved that the student had ingested GHB. That test was excluded from further consideration in the case.

-The laboratory that conducted the second test, the hair test, concluded from the outset that it could not confirm the presence of exogenous GHB. Brown received inconsistent accounts from the laboratory about how the test was conducted, leading to concerns about the reliability of the information from the laboratory. For this reason, the results from this test were never used as evidence by the student conduct panel hearing the allegations made against Phi Kappa Psi.

-For both of these tests, a failure to positively identify the presence of exogenous GHB does not prove that GHB or another drug was not ingested. GHB, in particular, is difficult to detect since it leaves the body quickly. GHB is only one of a number of possible date rape drugs (including alcohol, the drug most commonly associated with sexual assault).
The final finding and sanction against Phi Kappa Psi did not rely on the results of any physical drug tests. Other evidence, including witness statements, video evidence, and the statements of the students who filed complaints, was sufficient to support the conclusion that the two students consumed alcohol and/or some other drug diminishing their normal functions to a degree that placed them at risk of harm. The sanctions imposed were based on this evidence as well as the past disciplinary record of the fraternity, and were fair and appropriate. It should be noted that, although Phi Kappa Psi was found responsible for holding an unregistered party and placing students at risk of harm, no member of Phi Kappa Psi was charged with sexual misconduct.

The statement went on to say that the University would no longer use either laboratory involved in the controversial testing.


The Brown Alumni Who Run This Country

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.