City of Providence Refuses to Answer Key Questions on Teppco's Closure

GoLocalProv News Team and Kate Nagle

City of Providence Refuses to Answer Key Questions on Teppco's Closure

The city has failed to shed light on a number of questions raised by GoLocal regarding the closure of a ProvPort business.
Following the revelation that ProvPort business Teppco is shuttering its doors after receiving a 400% tax hike, GoLocal inquired with the City of Providence once again as to how the loss of over thirty jobs at a local business was allowed to happen -- and was left with more questions than answers.

GoLocal contributor Russ Moore wrote on Thursday:

According to sources with the company and at the Port, the City’s [one million dollar] tax increase was the major cause of the closure of the facility that has been operating since 1971. Moreover, the failure by city officials to respond and work to resolve the issues caused Teppco to lose a potential buyer that would have allowed the facility to continue to operate and retain jobs.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Subsequent to the revelations, GoLocal asked the following of the city:

* Why didn’t the city respond to multiple requests for meetings for months?
* How can the city justify taxes for the same facility increasing by nearly 400% in one year, but 6400% increase in 10 years?
* Why is David Quinn and his staff non-responsive to inquiries?
* Who does David Quinn report to?
* How many commercial businesses pay more than $250,000 in taxes per year?
* Is the Mayor concerned about the responsiveness of the administration?
* What is the mayor doing to make sure this does not happen again?
* Is the Mayor starting an internal investigation?
* Do you expect staff changes or disciplinary actions?

The city responded to some -- but not all -- of the questions on Thursday.

City Response

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza
"It is the City’s understanding that discussions of mothballing the facility located in ProvPort predate the receipt of the tax bill in dispute. An evaluation of properties along the waterfront revealed a number of real and tangible assets that were either incorrectly valued or not included on the city’s tax rolls. The subsequent adjustments were made as part of our ongoing efforts to accurately and completely reflect the value of property in the city," said Elorza spokesperson Evan England.

"The Administration is committed to providing responsive service and outstanding accessibility to any resident or stakeholder who seeks to do business with the City. The Tax Assessor and Tax Assessor’s Office responds to hundreds of inquiries in a given week and has been in touch with representatives of TEPPCO/Enterprise frequently and as recently as last week.  The city is committed to working with the current or perspective tenants to utilize the opportunity that our waterfront has to offer, much like we did in the recent agreement to build a cement process facility with McInnis Inc," said England. "In the event that the representatives or TEPPCO/Enterprise feel or believe that the current valuation of their taxable property and tangible assets is incorrect, we encourage them to avail themselves of the city’s appeal process."

The City did not answer why it did it not respond to repeated requests for meetings nor did the city tax assessor; it also failed to address to whether Elorza had concerns as to the response in this instance.

When GoLocal followed up to address the unanswered questions, England did add, "Just over 180 properties [are] paying more than $200,000 in taxes" -- but nothing else.


10 Biggest Issues Facing Providence in 2016

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.