Who's Afraid of the Dark? Guest MINDSETTER™ Artigas

Steven Artigas, GoLocalProv Guest MINDSETTER™

Who's Afraid of the Dark? Guest MINDSETTER™ Artigas

A rendering of the Burrillville Power Plant.
The recent denial of needed permits for the proposed Clear River power plant in Burrillville has been seen as a victory by the local citizenry as well as the special interests who fight any fossil-fuel electric generation tooth and nail. 

Many of the local residents, having been swayed by those pushing renewables, i.e. solar and wind power, only too readily adopt the NIMBY attitude- not in my back yard- but how many of them would complain if the lights didn't work?

Recent blackouts in New York demonstrate just how much we take a reliable supply of electric power for granted.  Those opposed to any new construction claim that there is no need to upgrade the infrastructure, and no new plants are required, but although vociferous, their stance is not realistic. 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Their position is that the future belongs to wind and solar power.  This may someday be true, but as of today we are not yet there, we are instead in the precarious position of an electric grid stretched to the max, and vulnerable to the least disruption. The objectors are deaf to the fact that the new gas-fired Burrillville plant would substitute for Brayton Point, now offline, and similar coal-fired plants.  And, they are equally uninterested in Canadian hydropower, an available source with zero emissions!  This view does not recognize the inherent shortcomings of their preferred sources, which are dormant at night and/or when there is no wind.  We can almost hear them- "Don't confuse me with facts!"

Solar and wind-generated electricity, aside from their collateral damage to natural resources, will never be more than a footnote alongside the power grid until suitable storage means, i.e. batteries, are developed. 

This is today a pipe dream, and there is nothing yet on the horizon.  Also, since batteries store chemical energy and not electricity, they will likely be toxic in the manufacture and present an enormous disposal challenge when worn out. 

As for those fanatical "greens" who suggest a scheme to prevent suitable battery advancement, consider that whoever comes up with this science would be famous overnight, and likely wealthy as well.  There's plenty of incentive!

As in many other contexts in the public discourse, this subject has the opposing sides talking, nay, screaming, past each other.  It would be infinitely more productive if contentiousness were replaced with co-operation.  A livable future depends on it.

 

Steven Artigas: I am some years' retired from 40 years as a self-employed building contractor in RI.  I have lived my entire life here and despair to see the results of decades of short-sighted leadership in our state. It is time that voices are heard on behalf of the million or so of us who lack connections in the state hierarchy. 

19 to Watch in 2019 - FULL LIST

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.