Bishop: Life in the Slowlane

Brian Bishop, GoLocalProv Guest MINDSETTER™

Bishop: Life in the Slowlane

Peter Alviti Jr.
How to get over the laughable RIDOT stampede on the ‘FASTLANE’ grant

Two weeks ago the RIDOT got word that what we have been saying all along is correct. Their application for an immense ‘FASTLANE’ grant from the feds was a sham. But everyone up there was drinking the Kool-Aid. 

They told us it was necessary to rush a preliminary design -- ignoring comments and criticisms. And they said it was necessary for them to have authority to waste $195 million dollars of state money going down the wrong path with the 6/10 connector in order to show the feds we were serious enough to deserve a grant. They told everyone to ignore the fact that these grants were meant for freight movement even though rebuilding the 6/10 bridges has virtually nothing to do with freight movement. But our elected officials and bureaucrats threw in their lot with RIDOT and we’re left  holding the bag again.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

As was clear, if anybody was actually listening at the ‘listening sessions’, Route 10 is just a commuter shortcut from Cranston (which itself increases rather than relieves commuter congestion by rejoining 95 in downtown Providence).

The Billion Dollar Bridge To Nowhere.

And Route 6 is the quintessential road to nowhere. Before everyone jumps ugly as if the implication is Johnston is nowhere, we’re talking in the super regional and national sense. These grants were meant for improved freight movement on roads of “national significance”.

The orphaned Army of the Grand Republic, even in its heyday, was a hodgepodge of pieced together highway from Provincetown, MA to Long Beach, CA that never had the traction, nor the long distance travel, of its famous cousin from Chicago, IL to Santa Monica, CA: Route 66. 

Even the onetime regional significance of Route 6 as the road to Hartford has sunken into obscurity. With the decision not to upgrade much of its route to interstate status as the RI terminus of Route 84, instead sending 84 north toward Worcester, the importance of commerce between Hartford and Providence has diminished. This hasn’t been good for either Providence or Hartford, but its way late to do much about it.

Cinderella’s Slipper Just Didn’t Fit.

You couldn’t have found a project much less deserving of a FASTLANE grant than the 6/10 connector, so how was the state lead to believe it had to rush forward with an embrace of RIDOTs ‘big dig’ to support such an application? And are we now going to listen to the same people telling us they are going to making quick plans of how to push forward regardless of this grant decision?

Unless the Governor actually sees how gullible she was to be taken in on this – not likely because people don’t like to admit being taken in – no heads will roll for this. Instead they’ll double down on how to shake us upside down for more money they couldn’t get from the feds.

Rather, this FASTLANE decision means it’s time we tried life in the slowlane: think before we act rather than vice versa. We ought to reconsider whether the roadways that were meant to connect Providence to Hartford should be rebuilt on such a grand scale to connect Providence to Johnston.

It is time to look ourselves in the mirror and ask if it is remotely realistic to spend a BILLION dollars on a half-baked local commuter road that actually makes travel on the interstate worse. 

What Can The Taxpayer Really Afford?

With the state as such a fickle partner, Providence is undertaking its own effort to plan for the best way to maintain commerce and commutes with its neighbors while improving its neighborhoods and saving the state hundreds of millions of dollars. Providence is renown for costing the state money, so this is a time to support and celebrate the city’s contribution to saving money.

Meanwhile, the Statewide Planning Council should consider an amendment to its Transportation Improvement Plan standing down from  the $195 million they allocated on false pretenses – that it was necessary to get this grant.  Money is going to be spent on these roadways in one form or another, but there is no excuse for authorizing hundreds of millions of dollars in borrowing for this project before we have a plan for what is actually going to be done.

Does RI spend enough?

A recent study by economists from the Boston branch of the Federal Reserve suggested that Rhode Island underinvests in infrastructure compared to other states. While this is a pattern mirrored by our New England neighbors, watching their debt loads, RI has the debt load of a high infrastructure state with nothing to show for it. The most important implication of this report is how wrongheaded the Brookings Institution plan for more corporatist public private partnerships is. The report’s authors caution that: “It appears that the state and local governments in Rhode Island have used government borrowing authority to support private ventures to an unusually high degree relative to borrowing for traditional public purposes”.

Thus our giveaways to private developers for historic preservation, expensive elite housing stock, questionable job creation incentives, and commercial and industrial development is what has consumed resources that could have been invested in infrastructure. And we’d be up to our armpits in it with a PawSox stadium if the people had not spoken out.

It’s Up To You To Tell Them No More.

Now the taxpayer must put their foot down again in public discourse and public elections by voting against those who voted for the tolls -- not because tolls are wrong in every conceivable case, but because the toll plan here is nothing but a slush fund for RIDOT to cover its own inefficient practices, poor monitoring of contracts and poor choices of what infrastructure is needed.

And lest one imagine that concerned taxpayers are buying the magic beans that abandoning the automobile or the internal combustion engine and turning Providence into Portland with mass transit is the answer, some of DOT’s most ridiculous infrastructure spending has been on mass transit. The Wickford train station is a colossal waste of money and an abject failure. That’s not a condemnation of commuter rail, but projects like Wickford, $44  million (plus the immense operating cost of keeping the service running that far south) to serve 80 people a day?

Now Pawtucket wants a $40 million dollar station. That might have made sense as a start – serving a densely populated area without requiring the cost of extending train runs. But after the disaster of Wickford Junction the approach will be more cautious holding Pawtucket to a higher standard. Nothing wrong with doing better cost benefit analysis on commuter rail, but it is difficult to imagine how DOT could have put Wickford Junction before Pawtucket, again undermining confidence in their decision making.

And even the  TF Green station – that probably has a future in an intermodal world and garnered some investment by marrying the station and the rental car agencies, it is rumored to have been a major source of the drain on highway maintenance funds for the state’s share of the project.!

That would be pretty easy to believe. Where do you suppose the RIDOT proposed to get the state share for the Governor’s boondoggle and unwanted ‘Welcome Stop’ at the state line? From the highway and bridge maintenance fund created after the debacle of the Sakonnet River Tolls. What’s the point of having a maintenance fund if it can be spent not on maintenance but some ribbon cutting opportunity for the Governor?

Money for consequential Infrastructure is important – if only DOT could see the difference

It is not that we have no need for new infrastructure. It is an embarrassment that the highway connecting 95 and the Newport bridge was never built, never mind that it was meant to hook up with Route 24 in Portsmouth and provide not only tourist convenience, but also to relieve Providence congestion.

And one thing the state ought to do for the Pawtucket Red Sox is upgrade access to the stadium. Modest exit and arterial road improvements coupled with private investment in allied commerce and entertainment could make McCoy feel like somewhere instead of nowhere.

Instead of wasting money on a South County ‘Welcome Center’, when anyone actually planning to visit the RI south coast already got off the highway at Route 2 in Connecticut, the state ought to be planning an overpass at the Rte. 1 / Rte. 78 junction so that both Westerly beaches and those of Charlestown, South Kingstown and Narragansett are more accessible to visitors. That would be a truly welcome improvement.

It is important that pot holes are fixed and traffic moves, but there is a psychological factor served by infrastructure that is lacking in RI.  Instead we have that quaint RI notion that ‘you can’t get there from here’. No one should feel that way, whether they are from RI or a visitor.  If that means talking about tolling major new undertakings, that is an entirely different story from tolling to make up for substandard maintenance by RIDOT and poor spending decisions by the General Assembly. 

 

Brian Bishop is on the board of OSTPA and has spent 20 years of activism protecting property rights, fighting overregulation and perverse incentives in tax policy. 

RI Truck Tolls Controversy -- 2016

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.