John Perilli: With New Climate Rule, EPA Must Step Up to Plate

John Perilli, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™

John Perilli: With New Climate Rule, EPA Must Step Up to Plate

With President Obama’s new climate regulation, our fight against climate change rests in the hands of the EPA, believes John Perilli

For the past year, the chief exports of our federal government have been cars, oil and disappointment.

President Barack Obama managed to keep a clean record during his first term, but his second term has featured one scandal after another. The botched introduction of Healthcare.gov sent Democratic approval ratings, flying high after the federal shutdown, into a desperate tailspin, and eventually claimed the cabinet post of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. More recently the shameful Veterans’ Affairs scandal, where long wait times at vets’ hospitals were covered up, forced VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to resign. The problem isn’t even close to being solved.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

In all this chaos, the President has introduced one of his most ambitious reforms since Obamacare: a new regulation that will impose a 30 percent cut on carbon pollution emitted by coal-fired power plants. Many environmentalists rejoiced at this change of pace by an administration which has given natural gas prospectors and the Keystone XL pipeline free passes, but the work is not done yet. The rule does not go into effect until 2015, and when it does, the brunt of the legwork will be borne by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Are you seeing a trend here?

Like HHS and the VA, the EPA is a powerful but ultimately fallible federal agency. It is subject to the same laws of bureaucracy and mismanagement that brought down Kathleen Sebelius and Eric Shinseki, and the stakes could not be higher. With the threat of a changing climate looming, the EPA better be ready to play ball––or it will damage our struggle against climate change beyond repair.

Our Roasting Planet

Unfortunately, the grim facts of climate change are becoming clearer every day, but it’s worth a quick refresher.

Climate change is one of those devilish things which is easy to dismiss because it is so hard to see, but it is a terribly real process. It is the slow warming of our planet as carbon dioxide emitted from burnt fossil fuels like coal and gasoline rises into our atmosphere and traps the heat in. It has already resulted in a record recession of glaciers and polar icecaps, and will continue to raise sea levels and intensify weather patterns until it causes widespread floods, destruction of property and population displacement.

Every major scientific body in every developed country in the world knows this is true

The US is the second largest carbon dioxide polluter in the world, after the dirty growing economy of China. And of all the US’s carbon emissions, 38 percent is supplied by power plants, the worst offenders of which are old, coal-fired power plants. Coal is by far the most pollution-intensive fossil fuel, and it makes crude oil and natural gas look positively green.

The idea behind the 30 percent cut to existing coal emissions is that it strikes at the snake’s head: It imposes a hard constraint on the worst polluting power plants in one of the worst polluting countries. The hope is that such a strike will be enough to avert, or at least alleviate, the worst effects of climate change. We may yet dodge a bullet, or perhaps a raging flood.

Tempting Fate

Despite its honorable intentions, though, the EPA is taking a daring route. By going all in to stop carbon pollution, Obama and EPA administrator Gina McCarthy are tempting an old political demon I like to call the “issue cycle.”

There are many issues in politics, but the ones that get taken care of first are not determined at random. They are a product of a delicate system of agenda politics, involving elections, public opinion, and the priorities of the various branches of government. When an issue comes to the forefront, it is either addressed to some degree or sent to the back of the line, sometimes for as long as twenty years.

Take healthcare, for example. The push for expanded access to healthcare in the United States began in earnest under Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s, and was realized in the creation of the Social Security Administration and the New Deal as a whole. After this success, the issue lay dormant for a quarter century, until it was picked up by Lyndon Johnson in the mid-1960s. He instituted Medicare and Medicaid as part of his “Great Society” agenda, and tried to implement a national healthcare program as well, but his toxic involvement in Vietnam ensured that his ambitions would be incomplete.

Skip ahead another twenty-five years to the Clinton Administration and its noble but unsuccessful attempt to create a nationwide healthcare system. Healthcare reform had waited its turn, but again reform failed to pass. The issue did not come to a head again until the Obama Administration, where a compromise individual-mandate system barely passed along party lines.

If you’re hoping for another round of nationwide healthcare reform, I hate to let you down. It’s going to be awhile.

This cycle can be traced with any number of economic issues: spending policy, monetary policy, energy. The length of the cycle might vary, but the trend is the same: State your case, or let the next customer come to the window.

With this most recent climate regulation, President Obama and the EPA are cutting the climate issue to the front of the queue. It has not been truly front and center since amendments to the groundbreaking Clean Air Act were passed in 1990, and before that, in 1970. If history is being honest with us, this push by the EPA could be our most significant advance on climate change until at least the 2030s.

The Pressure Is On

For our sake, the EPA better be ready to roll. The forces of climate change will not wait another petty political cycle to submerge us, and the climate rule may be our last hope. It will have to withstand numerous legal challenges, like the ones that almost sank Obamacare. It will have to successfully implement a dangerous plan of letting each state draft an emissions reduction plan or risk federal intrusion, which looks a bit too much like the health exchanges. It will have to last through potentially unfriendly future administrations who might try to dismantle it.

It will have to work.

We had all better hope that EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy isn’t shown the door in the same manner as Kathleen Sebelius and Eric Shinseki––in the wake of a scandal. We had all better hope everyone at the EPA has their wits and competence about them. They have the weight of our slowly boiling world on their shoulders.

John Perilli is a native of Cumberland, RI and a rising senior at Brown University. He works for Magaziner for Treasurer. The opinions presented in this piece do not represent the opinions of any organizations John Perilli is affiliated with.

Natural Disasters: RI's Most At Risk and Vulnerable Communities

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.