Roach: 38 Studios Loan Debate at Heart of RI Gubernatorial Race

Don Roach, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™

Roach: 38 Studios Loan Debate at Heart of RI Gubernatorial Race

Ken Block, Angel Taveras, Todd Giroux, Allan Fung, Clay Pell, and Gina Raimondo don’t agree on many things and if Rhode Island should repay the 38 Studios loan is just another item they can’t seem to find common ground. On one side, we have Block, Fung, and Giroux saying that the state should not pay back the loan. On the other side, there’s Taveras, Pell, and Raimondo who believe that we should repay the 38 Studios loan.

It’s no secret that the 38 Studios deal was a bad deal. We all know the story of how Governor Carcieri and members of the General Assembly decided to put all of our economic eggs into Curt Shilling’s basket only to have said basked go belly-up faster than you could say Knights of Amular: Reckoning. However, the issue now is whether we – the taxpayers – continue to pay for the mistakes of our past leaders.

On principle, I say no. Block, Fung, and Giroux would each agree. Block recently was quoted as saying:

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Wall Street insiders want to protect bondholders and force states like Rhode Island to stand behind ‘moral obligation bonds’ under any circumstances. The ongoing legal challenges and scandals continuing to swirl around the 38 Studios deal necessitate a halt in paying off those bonds.

Again, I agree with this sentiment. Why should we – the taxpayers – have to pay for the our government’s mistakes? For most of us, when we make a mistake the government isn’t there to bail us out so why should we be there for the government?

Well, Governor Chafee has argued that if we default on the 38 Studios repayment Rhode Island’s credit rating will…go in the tank. The S&P Ratings Services looks like they would agree as they recently stated, “if Rhode Island were to fail to support any of its debt, we would likely take negative rating action.” If the state’s credit rating goes down, it increases the cost our state incurs to borrow and in some cases if our credit rating dips below a certain criteria, it could trigger accelerated payments.

So which position should we support?

This is a difficult decision, quite honestly. Do we take the risk of our credit rating tanking in order to make a point? Do we repay the bonds in the hopes that the lawsuit provides the state with some ability to recoup what it has lost?

The maverick in me says we should take the position of not repaying the bonds. The bonds were a result of a few people making a very bad decision and we – the taxpayers – are left picking up the pieces.

That’s what the maverick in me would do. The guy really concerned about our credit rating, would reluctantly make the repayments again and again until the lawsuit was settled or the bonds repayments we completed.


10 Questions Block Has to Answer When Running for Gov of RI

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.