Russell Moore: Don’t Gut Pension Reform

Russell J. Moore, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™

Russell Moore: Don’t Gut Pension Reform

State leaders need to stand firm on pension reform or else we won't have the capital we need to fund the necessary social programs, believes Russell Moore.
If anyone is still wondering why Rhode Island needed pension reform, look no further than Providence Journal ace reporter Katherine Gregg’s story from Thursday December 26.

The story is about a group of roughly 1,100 retired state workers who fell into a loophole after pension reform was implemented. Several years ago, these particular workers took an option that allowed them to receive increased pension payments prior to achieving the social security retirement age in exchange for similar reductions in their pensions once they reached retirement age.

The problem for these retirees is that cost-of-living-allowances (colas) were suspended by the pension reform of 2011, and these particular folks were counting on their colas to make up for their decreased pension payments after retirement. To rectify the situation, the state retirement board is looking to give these retirees to opt out of that program and take smaller cuts than they would have had they waited to retire.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Work for 30 years, collect for 30 years?

That's all well and good. But what’s most interesting about the story was the anecdote. The gentleman referenced in the story to illustrate the plight of these thousand or so folks was a “maintenance supervisor” at the University of Rhode Island. He retired at age 51 in 2008, after having worked 32 years for the state. He currently receives a pension worth just over $50,000.

That means he’s receiving a pension worth just a few thousand less than the median income in Rhode Island, from the state taxpayers.

When people here about millions over millions in unfunded liabilities and the pension fund having had only 60 percent of its obligations funded, their eyes glaze over. But when people are alerted to the idea of someone who worked for the state for 32 years and could retire at 51 and receive a pension upwards of $50,000, with cost-of-living adjustments forthcoming, support for pension reform grew.

None of this should be a criticism of this particular worker, or any of the workers for that matter who simply followed the rules that were laid out them and worked hard for the state.

But let’s keep in mind that the private sector, which funds the public sector, doesn’t offer its workers pensions at all. They’re a thing of the past because they weren’t economical. Yes, this particular individual see his pension cut once he reaches the social security age, but the larger problem is how expensive and generous the system was prior to pension reform.

We can't have a public sector that pays better wages, better benefits, and contains more job security than the private sector. When that's the case, everyone will be incentivized to try and work in the public sector. That's what fosters an environment of corruption.

A dinosaur

Let’s face it: the pension system was a dinosaur prior to 2011. It was designed in an era when the average lifespan of the average Rhode Islander was far lower than it is today. If a person was only expected to live to 65 years old, the system made sense for a person to retire at 50 and collect for 15-years. But when people are living well into their eighties, the defined benefit system became unaffordable.

Further, people are not only living longer, they're living healthier lives. There are plenty of 51-year-olds that finish marathons and other magnificent athletic accomplishments. If people can do marathons at 50, I'm pretty sure they can work well past that age as well.

An easy copout regarding the pension system is to blame politicians from the past for not funding it. Yes, the system should’ve been properly funded. But what’s not being acknowledged is the fact that the reason it wasn’t funded was because it was so darn expensive.

Landmark reform

Thankfully, the state legislature made the system more affordable for taxpayers and therefore more secure for employees by raising the retirement age, suspending cost-of-living allowances, and introducing a 401k-style plan to modernize the system and make it more portable for employees.

But what makes all this relevant is the fact that the public sector unions are currently suing the state to overturn the landmark pension reform bill of 2011. The public sector unions are currently in negotiations with Governor Lincoln Chafee and General Treasurer Gina Raimondo to settle the suit.

What's at stake is the very spirit of pension reform.

Should Chafee and Raimondo cave and gut pension reform, Rhode Island will find itself behind the financial 8 ball.

None of this is to say that there isn't room for some concessions. The most reasonable idea came from former General Treasurer Frank Caprio, who is also currently a candidate for the same office. Caprio's plan would reduce the significant fees (more than $50 million) paid to Wall Street Fat Cats and Hedge Fund Cowboys and use the savings to partially reinstate colas. A reasonable compromise like this one would also prevent the danger that a judge throws out the pension reform law in its entirety.

That would be a catastrophe.

There's only so much money

There’s been a big debate raging on blogs and in social media about Gubernatorial candidate and Providence Mayor Angel Taveras’ plan to create and statewide kindergarten program for 4-year-olds. Specifically, how the plan would be funded is the point of contention. Money is fungible, and without pension reform, there would have been very little, maybe no money to fund the progressive causes like pre-kindergarten. The costs of the ballooning system would have eaten up all the money.

Unfortunately, we can’t have our cake and eat it too. In the upcoming year, state leaders need to stand firm on pension reform or else we won't have the capital we need to fund the necessary social programs.

 

A native Rhode Islander, Russell J. Moore is a graduate of Providence College and St. Raphael Academy. He worked as a news reporter for 7 years (2004-2010), 5 of which with The Warwick Beacon, focusing on government. He continues to keep a close eye on the inner workings of Rhode Islands state and local governments.

Timeline - Rhode Island Pension Reform

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.