David Brussat, Dr. Downtown: Truly Historic Preservation Tax Credits

David Brussat, GoLocalProv Dr. Downtown

David Brussat, Dr. Downtown: Truly Historic Preservation Tax Credits

Governor Gina Raimondo courtesy: Richard McCaffrey
Governor Raimondo’s budget has been praised for trying to boost the economy, but she has not embraced the most powerful economic-development tool that Rhode Island has seen in at least half a century. No state program in the history of Rhode Island has done more for its economy than the state Historic Preservation Tax Credit Program.

The program was passed by the General Assembly in 2001 and it worked like a charm. In less than a decade it created $1.3 billion in growth, 22,000 construction jobs, 6,000 permanent jobs and $800 million in wages at a cost of $300 million. Each dollar invested created more than four dollars of growth. It was canceled in the recession but revived in 2013, creating another flow of economic stimulus. Yet it was not extended in 2014.

When the program’s 30-percent offset was combined with the 20-percent offset of its federal sister, it provided a very significant incentive to favor the renovation of old buildings over the construction of new ones, which is usually less expensive. The program thus served to strengthen one of Rhode Island’s few competitive advantages - its historic beauty.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

A governor who fails to extend that program cannot truly be said to favor economic growth in Rhode Island. 

Raimondo’s Dud Incentive Program

Instead of extending a proven job creator, Raimondo proposes innovation incentives that sound good but already exist in state law to little effect. Little will come from adding more. Five such high-tech subsidies have been available to the 195 redevelopment commission since 2011. The result? Nothing so far. The commission has signed off on a student dorm.

In 2013, the preservation credit program’s revival was achieved in spite of blowback from the 38 Studios fiasco, which put all tax credits under a cloud. This year the preservation tax credits are haunted by public concern that the program would be sucked dry by one project, the renovation of the Industrial Trust (“Superman”) Building.

Raimondo should have the courage to spike those fears and revive this program. Instead of proposing tax incentives that merely seek to offset the high cost of doing business in Rhode Island, she should cut those high costs first, attacking tax and regulatory burdens that hurt all businesses. Then let’s see whether the high-tech subsidies that already exist will bear fruit. 

She should extend the historic tax credits with a vigor she has directed to innovation credits. After all, the historic buildings that qualify are already here and aren’t going anywhere. Unlike innovaction credits, preservation credits cost the state any money until the work is done and the jobs already in place, making the kind of bait and switch that 38 Studios pulled impossible.

What preservation credits created

Masonic Temple project, courtesy of WJE Engineers:
Preservation credits enabled the revival of downtown Providence, but were used everywhere in Rhode Island, where they deflected investment from new construction into the adaptive reuse of existing buildings. New construction often erodes the historical character that persists more in Rhode Island than almost every other state. Slowing half a century of suburbanizing trends, the preservation credits shifted the correlation of economic forces here, reviving urban areas and protecting greenfields. Indeed, the credits’ policy impact has been green, green, green!

Rhode Island’s preservation credits strapped booster rockets on a federal credit program in effect since 1976. In 2008, the state removed those boosters, in effect deepening the recession here.

While a state does ride national economic trends, their manifestation is purely local. The national economy expands the level of total investment nationally, but it flows into a state based on the local factors that attract or repel money. Here the preservation tax credits helped mitigate the downer of the state’s business climate. That was a major factor in our boom in 2001-2007. Ending the credits helped kill Rhode Island’s ability to emerge from the recession.

With national economic trends beginning, at last, to trickle down to Rhode Island, and with news of Buff Chace and other developers eyeing even more old buildings to redevelop, now is the time to strap that booster rocket back on.

Raimondo's last man standing

courtesy of discovernewport.org:
The governor has also recommended focusing the Ocean State’s tourism dollars on promoting the entire state as a travel destination. But without the preservation tax credits to strengthen its historic character, Rhode Island’s “brand” will erode over time. Eventually, the branding effort will seem so ineffective, indeed so ridiculous, that even state officials will have to concede the pointlessness of a state agency to promote it.

At some point, under Gina Raimondo or the next governor, the State Tourism Council will start to look like low-hanging fruit to budget cutters. By then, so will the State Planning Council and Commerce RI. Stephen Pryor’s successor will already be long gone. Dr. Downtown’s thought experiment of eliminating entire agencies may become the fiscal policy of Rhode Island. Let us hope the governor hires someone to masterplan that possibility, worst-case-scenario-wise.


Raimondo's Budget - Winners and Losers

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.