ProvPort’s New Tenant Mired in Controversy in Canada, Under Fire for Being Anti-U.S. Worker

GoLocalProv News Team

ProvPort’s New Tenant Mired in Controversy in Canada, Under Fire for Being Anti-U.S. Worker

Controversial plant in Quebec, behind schedule and taking on huge cost overruns.
The newest tenant at ProvPort - McInnis Cement - is tied to a range of environmental concerns, questions of financial viability, and claims of political “cronyism,” according to one of Canada’s leading magazines. Add to the list of controversies that American lawmakers say the Quebec-based company is anti-American worker.

At the center of the battle is Canadian billionaire Laurent Beaudoin, who has received hundreds of millions in subsidies from the provisional government.

Tax Breaks = $500,000 a Job

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Now, Providence’s newest company has received a massive tax break from the City of Providence — an estimated $5 million over the twelve years — which equates to $500,000 per job created, according to the company.  

McInnis has pledged to invest $22 million in its new project in Providence.  According to a company press release, McInnis will produce 10 permanent jobs in Rhode Island, and some undetermined number in short-term positions constructing the facility.

“The tax schedule that was approved included about $5M savings over the first 12 years and then we revert to paying the full tax bill.  This was designed to assist our new company in its earliest years in Providence,” said Maryse Tremblay, Directrice communications et responsabilité sociale d’entreprise for the Quebec-based company. 

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza said in announcing the deal, “This agreement with McInnis USA, Inc. (American subsidiary) is a perfect example of the city working to attract quality businesses which will add to the city’s industrial sector, create job opportunities for locals, rehabilitate city property and expand our tax base.”

But in New York, Michigan and Ohio, members of the United States Senate and members of the House of Representatives claim the governmental investment in a private company violate trade agreement -- and is unfair to U.S. workers. 

U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
Democratic Senators Claim Company’s Subsidy is Unfair to U.S. Workers

According to U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Sherrod Brown (D-OH), McInnis’ financing scheme creates a disadvantage for U.S. workers. 

Both Senators and others members of Congress have complaints filed with President Obama’s U.S. Trade Representatives, blasting the competitive advantage for McInnis.

“But if countries like Canada illegally subsidize their industries, and target the U.S. market, it gives their products an unfair advantage. I urge the administration to investigate the nearly $500 million subsidy package proposed for the Quebec plant, which will directly compete with Lafarge North America’s facility in Paulding (OH). Actions must be taken in order to protect Paulding jobs and the economy of Northwest Ohio,” wrote Senator Brown to the USTR.

In May of 2016, members of the Ohio legislature also sought action. The House of Representative passed a Resolution, “To urge the Office of the United States Trade Representative to ensure that no World Trade Organization rules are violated in regard to government funding of the McInnis cement and the Port-Daniel-Gascons cement plant in Quebec, Canada.”

The author of the resolution, Rep. Tony Burkley said, "Ohio's private cement industry should not have to compete with a taxpayer-funded operations based on foreign soil."

NY's Schumer has battled McInnis -- and their subsidies -- as well. 

U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
“Upstate New York’s cement producers provide good-paying jobs to hundreds of New Yorkers, and we must make sure none of those jobs are put in jeopardy by unfairly subsidized competition from Canada,” said Senator Schumer. “That is why I am calling on the U.S. Trade Representative to investigate what is going on over the border and step in to protect local jobs. Lafarge and Lehigh Hanson play by the rules, and it is only fair that Canadian cement companies should too.”

McInnis responded to the complaints from American lawmakers that the subsidies were illegal and unfair.

“The financial package does not constitute a subsidy because the investments are commercial and not based on export. Production is projected to be 50/50 for the Canadian and export market (the latter of which is mostly for the United States, as well as other countries as we expand),” said Tremblay in an email to GoLocal.

Beaudoin headed one of the largest aircraft co. for decades, now is the billionaire that has attracted nearly $500M for this project.
“The project has attracted private and public funds because it’s a very good investment and one that stands to benefit the US construction industry. In fact, according to the US cement industry, the United States will need to import 15 to 25 million additional tons in a market that is recovering from a shortage, and McInnis cement production will serve that growth," she added.

Canada's press, however, detailed the project over-runs for McInnis up there -- and use of public funds. 

“The $450-million in public money amounted to about 40 percent of the project’s total projected cost of $1.1-billion – or at least it did, until The Globe and Mail this week revealed that construction has gone over budget by at least $400-million and the promoters will require additional financing,” wrote Canada’s largest newspaper, The Globe and Mail, in June. 

In Canada,  McInnis’ Ethics And Environmental Impact Are Questioned

The Maclean's magazine feature on the over budget -- and controversial McInnis project.
In a sweeping story about the project in Maclean's magazine, “Why did the Quebec government hand millions to an emission-belching, billionaire-owned cement factory?” raises a range of concerns about the financial deal, political favoritism, and the adverse environmental impact. 

“Whether it is an astute public investment or the product of political favouritism, this much is true: the plant, which is located on the southern flank of Quebec’s Gaspé Peninsula, will emit between 1.8 and 2.2 million tonnes of greenhouse gases a year after it starts up this fall,” wrote reporter Martin Patriquin.

“Despite nearly half a billion dollars in public funding, Port-Daniel’s viability remains up in the air—like so much carbon dioxide,” wrote Patriquin.


Rhode Island’s 50 Wealthiest and Most Influential - 2015 Edition

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.