Pell Bridge Turns 50, Washington Must Build for the Future: Guest MINDSETTER™ Berbrick

Guest MINDSETTER™ Walter Berbrick

Pell Bridge Turns 50, Washington Must Build for the Future: Guest MINDSETTER™ Berbrick

In 1969, Nixon became President, Buzz Aldrin walked on the moon, and the first cars crossed the Newport Bridge (officially named the Newport Claiborne Pell Bridge after U.S. Senator Claiborne Pell in 1992).

The longest suspension bridge in New England forever changed Rhode Island. Thousands helped build the sturdy structure and nearly 350 million motorists have crossed it. It’s a symbol of hope and American ingenuity.

During this same half century, however, America’s investment in transportation infrastructure, as a share of our economy, has been cut by half. In fact, China invests four times as much as we do in transportation and most European countries now invest twice as much as us.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

It’s no wonder why the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave the United States a D+ grade in overall infrastructure. To put that in perspective, the over 54,000 faulty bridges, if placed together, would stretch from Providence to Orlando. Needless to say, the failed federal policies of our past have left this generation, my generation, in a $2 trillion dollar hole.

Rhode Island, with the highest percentage of structurally deficient bridges in America, has the deepest hole to get out of. And Providence, the city of progress, is home to the worst of them. Despite the striking fact that the number of structurally deficient bridges are down across America, it would still take us at least the next 50 years to repair or replace those bridges given the current pace of investment and inaction.

It comes down to a failure of leadership in Washington. It’s not a two-year or six-year investment, it’s a generational investment— because for a generation, lawmakers from both Houses and both parties have failed to invest in the infrastructure of the future.

Beyond making our bridges safer, infrastructure investments of all kinds, from roads and rails to homes and hospitals, must be built to stand the test of time—which increasingly will include the worst impacts of climate change, something these staggering estimates don’t account for. Because it’s not a question of if, but when the next extreme weather event or devastating wildfire will hit.

That’s why Washington should empower state and local leaders who need help building a strong defense against the climate impacts felt today—and against the more devastating ones of tomorrow. In doing so, House leadership should set clear, ambitious, and specific goals, requirements, and incentives to reduce carbon pollution through infrastructure investments. Federal funding should prioritize investments that increase resilience and nonpolluting alternatives—like electric vehicles—and increase affordable access to opportunities like biking, walking, and public transportation.

Lawmakers in Washington should require and incentivize states to prioritize and spend money on repairs. And State agencies competing for limited federal funds to expand transit must prove they can fund long-term maintenance and operations. The sorry state of Rhode Island’s roads and bridges clearly reflect that reality.

To make matters worse, these sobering estimates do not account for social inequities made worse by neglectful and discriminatory infrastructure investment policies. That’s why federal funds should target communities facing the greatest need while preventing pollution and geographic isolation—especially in underserved, low-wealth, and rural communities.

Surely we’ll need to build better roads and bridges for a better tomorrow. That means we’ll need to change the way we build. If the cement industry were a country, it would be the third largest emitter in the world— behind China and the US. No matter the type of bridge, we must radically rethink how bridges are constructed, inspected, maintained and replaced. We’ll need to spearhead new research and take advantage of research underway. Surely we’ve got a lot of work to do—from developing new technologies and materials that reduce the carbon footprint of infrastructure to breaking down institutional barriers that sever its funding sources.

But throwing more money at the problem isn’t the only answer either. A future infrastructure bill must protect workers’ rights, fight workplace discrimination, set high standards for wages and benefits, and facilitate high-quality training and apprenticeships. It should give our veterans preference and embrace our neighbors released from prison.

A comprehensive national infrastructure investment package provides Washington an extraordinary opportunity to unite a divided nation and a divided Congress around a common purpose: higher wages, rebuilding struggling communities, and decarbonizing our economy.

It’s time Washington roll up its sleeves and get to work. We can do better—and we must. We certainly won’t solve these issues overnight; or within the next couple years, for that matter. As the old saying goes, “we’ll cross that bridge when the time comes.” Well the time is now. Let’s cross this bridge together.  And let’s get it right for the next generation who will inherit a warmer and wetter America.

 

Dr. Walter Berbrick is an Associate Professor in the War Gaming Department, the Director of the Arctic Studies Group, and the Area Study Coordinator for the Global Climate Security electives program at the U.S. Naval War College. As a 2016-2017 International Affairs Fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR),  he served as a Senior Adviser to the Special Representative for the Arctic Region at the State Department. He is a CFR term member, Navy veteran, and Community Volunteer Leader with the American Red Cross of Rhode Island. The views expressed here are his own.

19 to Watch in 2019 - FULL LIST

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.