Battle Heats up over Historic East Side Development

Kate Nagle, GoLocalProv Contributor

Battle Heats up over Historic East Side Development

Construction at 200 Hope Street has raised concerns among East Side residents and community groups
A new development to a historic property on the East Side of Providence has residents and community groups expressing concerns about the scope of the project -- and the city's zoning and approval process.

The construction at 200 Hope Street by owner David Baskin currently has a stop-work order for at least one of its floors, and abutters are trying to halt the project in its tracks. The historic building is at the corner of Hope and Angell Streets, and across from the Wheeler School.

"We just moved here in June, we came from Connecticut," said Dawn Robertson, one of the neighboring residents who has been vocal in her concerns over the project. "We deliberately chose Providence. It's got everything we want."

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

However, Robertson said, "The construction and intention of the use of 200 Hope Street changes the neighborhood because of increased density and basically turns a two apartment and one office building into a single room occupancy, the difficulty that we have had with the transparency of the planning and zoning process and the damage to a historical property."

Robertson continued, "It appears to me as a new resident that developers are favored over citizens. I don't know if that's true, but it feels that way." 

Neighbors, Preservation Society Question Plans

"The zoning process is about as byzantine a process you could get. I feel like they want us to all sell, and make it non-owner residential. I understand that I live on College Hill, and close to Brown," said Robertson.  "But this house was never meant for the number of students they want to put in there. It's on the National Historic Registry."

A building permit displayed on a basement window at 200 Hope Street
Paul Wackrow with the Providence Preservation Society said the organization was closely following the project.

"We've been concerned about this for some time, since the neighbors brought it to our attention," said Wackrow. "It's a landmark building on the East Side -- one of 3 Lippitt Houses -- and it's one of the busiest intersections."

Wackrow continued, "I think because they call for intensification of use, it looks to be ostensibly student housing -- that in itself could cause damage to the interior. It would place an increased strain on everything -- utilities, structure."

"We're not anti-development. In an ideal world, we'd work with the developer to come up with a plan that's mutually beneficial, we've done that in the past with GTECH and the Arcade. We've reached out to him, up to this point, we haven't had much of response," said Wackrow.  "We're not closing the door on a dialogue."

Developer Defends Project, Process

Baskin is being represented by John Garrahy with the Providence law firm Moses, Afonso, Ryan on the project.

"[Baskin] filed for a permit, and the city went through went through the process as to whether they're entitled to the permit. They received a permit in December for work on the basement, and in February for work on the 3rd floor," said Garrahy.

"The neighbors appealed the permit with response to repairs in the basement, and 3rd floor. Because they appealed it to the [Building Board of Review], we argued that the Building Board of Review wasn't the correct place. They have now appealed one of the permits -- 3rd floor -- to zoning board. Now we're waiting for a hearing with the zoning board on April 7th."

Garrahy said that his client believes he entitled to the work he received the permits for. "We haven't had much conversations with the neighbors to date, maybe between now and April we will. [Baskin] thought they were legally entitled to the work."

"We'll work with the PPS," said Garrahy.  "There's not going to be any changes to exterior besides changing windows. And the city dictates the occupancy numbers, which we'll be abiding by."

Council Member Weighs In

Providence City Council member Sam Zurier said that he wanted to see a change in the way the city allows for testimony at Building Board of Review meetings, following the recent appeal meeting on February 20 that residents weren't allowed to testify, when the matter was transferred to the Zoning Board of Appeals.

"One of the things that surprised me is that there were people who wanted to speak at the [Building Board of Review] meeting, and they couldn't speak, just because it was moved do the zoning board," said Zurier. "So I recenty put on the City Council docket an ordinance if when the BBR meets, and people want to speak, they can be allowed. We hadto do this with the zoning board of review last summer. The solicitor's office sat down and set procedures, and so they didn't ultimately have to go through the legislative process."

"I don't want to be responsible for micromanaging these boards and commissions," said Zurier.  "The first inclination for me is to create fair procedures."

The Mayor's office did not respond for comment on the receht developments at 200 Hope Street.  


Providence's 10 Most Endangered Properties of 2014

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.