EDITORIAL: A Solid RI State Budget, But One Silly Provision that Sends the Wrong Message

EDITORIAL

EDITORIAL: A Solid RI State Budget, But One Silly Provision that Sends the Wrong Message

L-R Speaker Mattiello, Governor Raimondo and Senate President Ruggerio
Kudos to House Speaker Nick Mattiello and Senate President Dominick Ruggerio for taking Governor Gina Raimondo’s incoherent and unbalanced budget and turning it into a fiscally responsible spending plan.

The budget passed by House Finance this week appears to have the support of the legislature and strikes a balance between supporting existing priorities, enhancing education and protecting the state from committing to new programs that would be immediately unaffordable in a recession.

Rhode Island’s reality is that existing spending programs are increasing in cost far faster than revenue is growing. Rhode Island has near perpetual deficits while nearly zero unemployment. Raimondo’s budget was littered with new or expanding spending programs funded on gimmicks.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Remember Raimondo’s cook-the-books revenue estimates on sports betting for the current fiscal year? The Governor estimated $23.5 million on premises that the National Gaming Association said were a misuse of data. Through the first ten months of the fiscal year, sports betting has generated just $3.8 million.  If Raimondo’s projections were correct, she could have funded her expansion of the RI Promise "free" college tuition program, but her budgets look more fiction than fact.

The House Finance-adopted budget included important resources to begin the process of improving Rhode Island schools, including an additional $41.9 million for education — and $5 million for English language learner programs.

The budget passed late on Friday night has collected a number of pro-economy provisions including the revamping of the 195 Commission’s powers to remove the obstacles to the largest private investment in Providence in the past 20 years — the $300 million Fane Tower -- a project that is being blocked simply by regulatory delay that Providence leaders — an inherent oxymoron — needed to review and vote up or down, but next-election politics and conflicts of interest slowed the project for nearly three years. Good for Ruggerio to require that the new review process be stripped from the city's oversight.

The new budget also put URI governance on a peer structure with other New England state universities. Some Providence College grads who now serve on the existing council will be disappointed, but the absurdity of their oversight role was flawed from the beginning.

The budget does include one significant and misguided provision. Sadly there is no paid lobbyist at the State House fighting for common sense.

The budget taxes digital downloads — streaming services and products like Netflix. The tax proposed by Raimondo was rightfully slammed by consumers in Rhode Island and the Wall Street Journal.

This type of tax policy is a message to the tech sector and to consumers that we have no idea what reality is and that we are oblivious to the future.

The WSJ’s criticism did major damage to Rhode Island's reputation by calling Raimondo one of the “Nickel and Diming Democrats.” All American CEOs do not agree with WSJ editorials, but they all read them.

The WSJ wrote:

"[Connecticut Governor] Mr. Lamont drew his toll inspiration from Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo, who has lately been scrounging for cash to finance “free college,” universal preschool and Medicaid. Last month she proposed extending the state 7% sales tax to Netflix, e-books, iTunes, interior decorating, landscaping, shooting ranges, beach parking and more."

Mattiello was right to block the other misguided and regressive fees proposed by Raimondo, but unfortunately left this anti-consumer and anti-innovation tax in. The tax generates $5 million — but will generate far more million utterances of “that blanking State House.”

“The committee did let one part of her sales tax expansion stand: digital downloads and streaming services like Netflix will be subject to the sales tax under the version approved by the committee,” said the leadership’s press release.

Overall, Mattiello and Ruggerio deserve credit for cleaning up a mess. Make a floor amendment and clean up the Netflix blunder -- heck, would we really want people to read less expensive e-books?


House Budget - What Is In and What Is Out, June 14, 2019

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.