More than 100 Tenants Are Alleging Mold Exposure at Brady Sullivan’s RI Mill Complexes

GoLocalProv News Team

More than 100 Tenants Are Alleging Mold Exposure at Brady Sullivan’s RI Mill Complexes

Flyer being distributed at the Harris Mill complex
The number of tenants with allegations of exposure to "mold and other pathogens" from living at developer Brady Sullivan’s mill buildings in Rhode Island is growing exponentially.

Now, there are more than 100 former and present tenants of the mill loft apartment properties.

“If this was another industry there would be a recall for the safety of the consumer. If [Brady Sullivan] were a conscientious and honorable company they would engage in good faith discussions with us to see how they can help these folks who have been injured and try to prevent this from ever happening again,” said Artin Coloian, one of the two attorneys representing the growing number of Brady Sullivan residents making allegations.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

GoLocal first reported on the allegations and litigation tied to contamination on January 20.

The first lawsuit was filed in Rhode Island Superior Court. That initial suit alleges that Brady Sullivan -- one of the largest developers in New England -- failed to take proper care of its property and refused to respond to repeated complaints about the conditions at one of their apartment buildings. The suit, moreover, claims the environmental conditions have made Jeffrey Mastrobuono terribly ill.

Brady Sullivan is tied to numerous environmental complaints, lawsuits, and fines by regulatory agencies throughout New England.

The suit is asking for a total of $60 million in damages -- $10 million in compensatory damages and $50 million of punitive damages.

Like the Mastrobuono lawsuit which is tied to Coventry’s Harris Mill Lofts, many of the growing number of complainants lived at that property. But now, residents and former residents of two other Rhode Island properties have come forward.

Attorney Artin Coloian
“We have multiple clients at the Lofts at Anthony Mills [in Coventry, RI] and the Pocasset Mill complex [in Johnston, RI],” said Coloian. 

In Rhode Island, Brady Sullivan operates six major property — all mill rehabs. Now, there are allegations of illness tied to three of the properties. Coloian alleges that Brady Sullivan takes shortcuts when rehabbing old mill structures into residential apartments. 

Those properties are:

Harris Mill Lofts in Coventry

US Rubber Lofts in Providence

Lofts at Anthony Mill in Coventry

Tourister Mill in Warren

American Wire in Pawtucket

Lofts at Pocasset Mill in Johnston

“We are seeing similarities in complaints with the symptoms of mold exposures and other pathogens from exposure at the property,” said Coloian.

Dr. David Miller, Medical Director of Northeast Medical Research Associations (NEMRA) appeared on GoLocal LIVE earlier this month where he spoke to the more than twenty patients he has seen with symptoms they say stem from exposure at developer Brady Sullivan's property in Coventry.

Brady Sullivan’s RI spokesperson, Patti Doyle said in an email to GoLocal, “We have provided all results of our recent testing to our residents in our continued quest to remain fully transparent.  We have also asked the same attorneys to provide any data or medical records that would support allegations of unsafe levels of mold. They have yet to provide such data. We, once again, call upon them to provide any substantiation of their allegations."

“In many instances, attorneys representing tenants have denied us access when requested and at other times, we were granted such access only under the threat of a court order. As recently as last Friday, the attorneys have refused to turn over possession to a tenant’s unit who is no longer living at the property, has removed his possessions, has no intention of returning and has filed suit against Brady Sullivan,” said Doyle.

New England Complaints

This is not the first time allegations or enforcement actions have been levied against Brady Sullivan:

Worcester

On January 4, 2016, GoLocal Worcester reported: "A developer who works throughout New England is under fire in New Hampshire — and workers unions and environmentalists are now asking the EPA to investigate all Brady Sullivan properties throughout the region, including Worcester.

Developer Brady Sullivan is currently the subject of a lead contamination lawsuit at Mill West in Manchester, NH, and Kevin Ksen with the Carpenters Local #107 in Worcester said a petition to the EPA with over 20,000 signatures is intended to monitor all of the developer’s properties, and cited examples of labor issues in Massachusetts that prompted the action. 

“We had some experiences with labor issues at Brady Sullivan properties in Massachusetts,” said Ksen.  “Our main concern is when property is developed, are they hiring quality workers, and doing legitimate work.  What happened in [New Hampshire], another contractor wouldn’t get away with that. So when that lawsuit moved forward, that’s what moved us to do the petition with Clean Water Action and Public Citizen,” said Ksen. 

Photo from mold at a Worcester area property
More in Worcester

On January 7, 2016, GoLocal reported:

More concerns are being raised by community organizers and New England labor leaders about the developer poised to redevelop the Old Courthouse in Worcester. But, business leaders and one member of the Worcester City Council defend the developer.

Brady Sullivan, a New Hampshire based company, purchased the building from the City of Worcester in April for $1.2 million. This project is not its only project in the Worcester-area. The company is also developing the Junction Shop Lofts in Worcester and the Lofts at Lancaster Mills in Clinton.

Now, new concerns are coming to light over the quality of the company’s work, issues of environmental exposure and allegation of failure to make timely payment to workers.

As GoLocalWorcester reported on Monday, Developer Brady Sullivan is currently the subject of a lead contamination lawsuit at Mill West in Manchester, NH, and Kevin Ksen with the Carpenters Local #107 in Worcester said a petition to the EPA with over 20,000 signatures is intended to monitor all of the developer’s properties, and cited examples of labor issues in Massachusetts that prompted the action.

“We had some experiences with labor issues at Brady Sullivan properties in Massachusetts,” said Ksen.  “Our main concern is when property is developed, are they hiring quality workers, and doing legitimate work.  What happened in [New Hampshire], another contractor wouldn’t get away with that. So when that lawsuit moved forward, that’s what moved us to do the petition with Clean Water Action and Public Citizen,” said Ksen.  

Now, there are concerns about building quality and new documentation of mold in Brady Sullivan units. 

“If Worcester cared about good jobs for local people, they wouldn’t have gone so willingly into this agreement. Brady Sullivan’s bad reputation is defined by their subcontractors’ track record of poor workmanship, health violations, safety violations, insurance fraud, and wage theft which just keeps getting longer,” Manny Gines, Organizer for the New England Carpenters. “Worcester already decided, so now it’s the City’s responsibility to guarantee that the problems that have been documented in Worcester and Clinton as well as Vermont, and New Hampshire don’t happen again.

"Three of the four workers at Brady Sullivan’s mill project in Clinton that were the victims of wage theft in July were Worcester residents," he said. "That should wake Worcester up enough to know they need to monitor Brady Sullivan and their subcontractors really closely in order to make sure this project doesn’t become a black-eye.”

In contrast, Tim Murray outlines the importance of the redevelopment of the Old Court House, “Brady Sullivan Properties’ multi-million dollar private sector investments in Worcester are significant. These investments are creating many jobs and spending locally where previously there were none as well as restoring dangerous and vacant buildings into needed, market rate, and workforce housing.”

Murray said, “Additionally, these investments expand the city’s tax base, which is critical in paying for needed municipal services. Also, Brady Sullivan’s commitment to work with the city to include local workers and contractors on these projects is fully supported by the Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce.”

New Hampshire

New Hampshire Public Radio reported on November 27, 2017, “A group of Manchester residents exposed to elevated levels of lead dust has reached a settlement with property developer Brady Sullivan. Several dozen residents of the Mill West apartment complex in Manchester sued Brady Sullivan, contending that the company’s construction project in 2015 in lower levels of the mill building kicked up dangerous levels of lead-dust into luxury apartments on higher floors.They also say Brady Sullivan, after making complaints about the lead exposure, would not let them out of their leases.” Terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

Brady Sullivan has also been tied to soil contamination issues on Londonberry, NH, asbestos dumping in Lawrence, MA and more than half a dozen other environment complaints around New England.


17 Biggest Business Stories of 2017

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.