Burrillville's Fogarty, Keable Come Out Against Invenergy Power Plant
GoLocalProv News Team
Burrillville's Fogarty, Keable Come Out Against Invenergy Power Plant

“As an initial matter, it must be stated that Burrillville has already done more than its fair share for the cause of the region’s energy needs. As you know, Burrillville already hosts a fossil fuel burning power plant and has done so for over two decades. Siting a second power plant in the same town does not comport with any rational notion of fairness. More importantly, having two power plants within five miles of one another raises serious concerns regarding cumulative negative health effects," wrote Fogarty and Keable.
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST"Additionally, the very residents who would be impacted most adversely by the proposed power plant have already endured – and continue to endure – the extreme inconvenience of a gas pipeline compression station located directly adjacent to the proposed site of this power plant. These residents have sacrificed enough of the quiet enjoyment of their homes. No more should be asked of them. We certainly should not ask them to suffer the loss in market value to their homes that the siting of this power plant would entail."
Notes From the Letter
Their letter also pointed out that Burrillville and neighboring Glocester contain "many of the natural resources in Rhode Island and is a significant reason why people choose to live there".
"To put these natural resources at risk by siting a colossal power plant in the middle of them would be unconscionable,” stated Keable and Fogarty. They also pointed out the power plant's location near Zambarano Hospital.
“We view as sacrosanct our obligation to speak on behalf of the patients at Zambarano Hospital, many of whom lack the capacity to speak on their own behalf. Our friends at Zambarano Hospital are the very people that government exists to protect – government should not now put them in harm’s way.”
The letter also points out traffic concerns that the power plant would cause.
“Our concerns regarding traffic extend not only to Glocester, but also to Burrillville and in particular to those living on Route 100. Obviously, the sheer amount of heavy traffic that would be involved in building the proposed power plant would be incredibly burdensome for anyone living on Wallum Lake Road. Our peaceful town would be subjected to nuisance activity of all kinds: congestion, noise, light, and, in all likelihood, dropping property values.”
Keable and Fogarty also noted that the power plant is in likely violation of the Resilient Rhode Island Act of 2014. The act calls for reductions of greenhouse gas emission by 25 percent below the 1990 levels by 2025, 50 percent below the 1990 levels by 20135 and 85 percent below the 1990 levels by 2050.
