Rep. Tanzi Urges Rejection of Plan to Cut Funding for Bike & Pedestrian Traffic Projects

GoLocalProv News Team

Rep. Tanzi Urges Rejection of Plan to Cut Funding for Bike & Pedestrian Traffic Projects

East Bay Bike Path PHOTO: RIDEM
Representative Teresa Tanzi is urging the State Planning Council to reject a proposed amendment to the state’s 10-year transportation plan that would cut funding for bicycle and pedestrian traffic improvements. 

“Our State Planning Council is responsible for looking at the big picture, and they must recognize that focusing on only the immediate problems facing our state is how we got into the current mess. We must look at every dollar we spend and see how it can solve two or more problems at once. Investing in wider roads only compounds the issues we, as a coastal state, face with climate change. These investments must serve our state’s long term needs: a healthier environment, coastal resilience, a healthier populace, stronger communities, and better infrastructure,” said Tanzi.

The council is set to vote on the change at its next meeting on Thursday morning. 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

The Amendment 

The amendment would cut the Transportation Alternatives Program, which funds bike and pedestrian access projects, by $37 million under the plan, shifting dollars toward fixing roads and bridges. 

Representative Teresa Tanzi
Tanzi added, “Our current statewide plan should promote opportunities for creating advantages, and we should not go back in time and shift our resources away from the effort to make alternative transportation a more viable option for all Rhode Islanders. We must invest in public transit and transportation alternatives if we want to compete with larger cities to attract and maintain an educated and heathy workforce. Passing this amendment foolishly puts the blinders back on, and closes off a real opportunity to use our tax dollars more effectively. We must not allow this to happen.”

Department of Transportation officials have defended the move by pointing toward the state’s status as having the highest percentage of structurally deficient bridges in the nation.


19 to Watch in 2019 - FULL LIST

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.