Robert Whitcomb's Digital Diary: Time for a Bipartisan Carbon Tax & Boston Hate

Robert Whitcomb, Columnist

Robert Whitcomb's Digital Diary: Time for a Bipartisan Carbon Tax & Boston Hate

Robert Whitcomb, former Editor of the the Providence Journal Editorial Page
Time for a Bipartisan Carbon Tax; Reality Bites on Healthcare Reform; ‘Too Much Boston’? Greenhouse Effect

 

"He knows no winter, he who loves the soil,

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

For stormy days, when he is free from toil,
He plans his summer crops, selects his seeds
From bright-paged catalogues for garden needs.
When looking out upon frost-silvered fields,
He visualizes autumn's golden yields;
He sees in snow and sleet and icy rain
Precious moisture for his early grain;
He hears spring-heralds in the storm's  turmoil­
He knows no winter, he who loves the soil." 


--  Sudie Stuart Hager, ‘’He Knows No Winter’’ 

 

Prepare for violent freeze-thaw cycles in the next few days. 

 

It’s heartening that some states are considering enacting a “carbon tax’’. This involves levying a fee on the production, distribution or use of fossil fuels based on how much carbon their burning emits. The taxing authority sets a price per ton on carbon, then translates it into a tax on electricity, natural gas, coal or oil.

 

 

The idea is to make carbon-based energy a bit more expensive to more fully account for the damage that it does to the environment, to human health and to national security (we still import oil from such dubious places as Saudi Arabia and Venezuela). A carbon tax by all the New England states would help accelerate the expansion of clean,  regionally available energy as solar, wind, geothermal and hydro – a boost for the region’s economy and energy security/independence.

 

The money from the fees would go into taxing jurisdictions’ revenues. Most carbon-tax proposals involve rebating some or all of that money back to the taxpayers. Massachusetts state Sen. Michael Barrett put nicely:

 

“The idea is to make it a little more expensive to pollute, a little more expensive to buy something that results in the emission of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere — which is the greenhouse gas that causes climate change — make it a little more expensive to do all that, but then you send the money back so that you spend it on something less polluting." He should have added that burning  some fossil fuels releases many toxic materials into the air, such as mercury.

In this time of intense antipathy between liberals (or “progressives,’’ as they are increasingly calling themselves) and conservatives, the carbon tax has adherents on both sides. The liberals like it for its environmental benefits and many conservatives like it for that and because it uses market pricing and not  direct government fiat to change  behavior. Indeed, some conservative economists and policy wonks have been touting it since the ‘90s.

Just the other day, some Republican elder statesmen strongly backed a carbon tax as a way to fight global warming.
 

The group, including Secretary of State James A. Baker III, former Secretary of State George P. Shultz and former Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., called taxing carbon pollution produced by burning fossil fuels “a conservative climate solution” based on free-market principles.

Even the anti-EPA Trump administration has a carbon-tax backer – no less than Rex Tillerson, former Exxon CEO and now secretary of state. He said during his Exxon leadership:

‘’We (Exxon) have long supported a carbon tax as the best policy of those being considered. Replacing the hodge-podge of current, largely ineffective regulations with a revenue-neutral carbon tax would ensure a uniform and predictable cost of carbon across the economy. It would allow market forces to drive solutions. It would maximize transparency, reduce administrative complexity, promote global participation and easily adjust to future developments in our understanding of climate science as well as the policy consequences of these actions.’’

 

Absolutely! Let us hope that he can convince President Trump, despite the president’s Tea Party base, of the value of a carbon tax at the federal level. But for now, the states must take the lead.

xxx

 

Obamacare
The Republican promise to ‘’repeal and replace’’ the Affordable Care Act with something better looks more and more like the sort of lie that has become so common in that increasingly demagogic and mendacious party. (The Democrats can be pretty bad, too,  but since the arrival of the Tea Party, the national GOP takes the cake in political and intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy.) I’m from a very Republican background and so say that sadly, while noting such sterling exceptions as Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, who is among the two or three most capable governors in America now, and a few GOP U.S. senators who have conducted themselves as honorable and independent conservatives rather than simply as people out for power and the economic advantages that come with it. A few Republicans on Capitol Hill don’t just “go along to get along’’ with their leadership  and even dare to challenge our bizarre and crooked new president. But far from enough.

 

Since the ACA was enacted, in 2010, innumerable Republican pols have indicated that they somehow have a better plan than the ACA to improve the Developed World’s most expensive and confusing healthcare “system.’’ Details have always been sparse.  “Repeal and replace!’’ has been the mantra. They did not tell us replace with what, but their sucker followers embraced the idea of destroying the ACA. But now some of the suckers are having second thoughts as they see what they’ll lose.

 

So Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans are rapidly backing and filling as the public shakes off its civic sloth and disinclination to read and realizes that a.) the ACA has helped a lot of people and b) none of the vague, contradictory and evasive healthcare-reform ideas being raised up the flagpole by leading Republicans would make things better and indeed would make things much worse for most people.

 

Thus there’s no real plan after SEVEN YEARS of denouncing the ACA (aka in  the pejorative Republican word “Obamacare_.’’

 

What the Republicans have succeeded in doing, led by their ignoramus-, demagogue-  and con-man-in-chief Donald Trump, is creating chaos and uncertainty in the insurance markets and amongst providers. So I wouldn’t be surprised if they keep most of the ACA lest they take a bath in the 2018 congressional elections. What phonies!

 

xxx

 

Betsy DeVos, Sec. of Education
It was nice to see two Republican senators join the Democrats in the doomed effort to stop billionaire heiress  and campaign contributor Betsy DeVos from becoming education secretary. Ms. DeVos has long expressed her visceral dislike of  public schools (which educate almost 90 percent of American kids). But public schools, charged with educating children of all backgrounds, are essential for a well-functioning democratic civic culture and economy and, indeed, for the national security of the United States. Weakening them by siphoning off much of their resources to private schools through vouchers, etc., weakens America.

 

Ms. DeVos does, it is true, support public charter schools but without demanding of them strong accountability. So even some charter-school fans, such as the Massachusetts Charter Public School Association and California philanthropist Eli Broad opposed her nomination. But then neither she nor her children ever attended a public school; nor has she ever run one or taught at one. And this ideologue demonstrated in her confirmation hearings an alarming ignorance about education policy.  None of this is to say that some charter schools, free of rigid, stupid union rules and run by strong principals and staffed with dedicated teachers, are not terrific.

 

Ms. DeVos’s main claim to fame is having piles of cash to push her unsubstantiated theories about the glories of privately run charter schools and vouchers to send kids to private (including religious) schools, thus reducing the money available for other public schools. Ms. DeVos also likes the idea of kids going to school online. That sure would save tax money, albeit at the cost of the in-person socialization with teachers and fellow students that most people would consider essential for the intellectual and social growth of young people.

 

But in the current Gilded Age-style corruption on Capitol Hill, that the DeVos money has given tens of millions to Republican candidates gets her an A from the GOP leadership. Still, couldn’t she just have bought an ambassadorship, say to Luxembourg, where she could throw big parties?

 

I have attended public and private schools and taught in a public high school. The demands placed upon, and needs of, public schools are very different from those of private ones (which have great freedom to pick their students). I suspect that Ms. DeVos’s views to no small extent boil down to the fact that most rich people understandably don’t want to pay more taxes, even for something as important as education and, hey, their children don’t go to public school anyway.

xxx

Boston Hate
There was a funny column in The Washington Post the other day headlined “Too Much Boston’’ about excess movies being made about what the headlines used to call “The Hub’’.  These films, replete with real or badly done  “Boston accents’’ (which  basically means the speech of Irish- or Italian-Americans there and almost never of the famous upper-crust “Boston Brahmins,’’ usually focus on the seamy, violent, crime-ridden underbelly of the city and its environs (including, for example, the town in Manchester-by-the-Sea, much of which is actually rich).

 

You’d think that Boston was the most dangerous, forbidding burg in America rather than the  generally safe, internationalized and prosperous (for many residents) place that it is --- world-famed for research, education, medicine, finance and high and popular culture. I suggest that the screenwriters, producers and directors give up the Boston bathos and make more use of, say, Chicago --- a much more dangerous place. That’s not to say that there aren’t some sour, gritty and indeed dangerous places in Boston. It is to say that its film noir aspects are getting overdone. And could we also get off the grossly outdated presentation of Providence as a Mob town!

 

New England is usual among American regions in having such a strong sense of regional identity and coherence (excluding Connecticut’s Fairfield County, which is glued to metro New York City). This came out, of course, with the frenzied six-state celebrations of the Patriots’ astonishing Super Bowl win. And part of that identity is having one major city, Boston, that’s not only the capital of its leading state but also the psychic, economic and cultural capital of the whole region. People in the Canadian Maritime Provinces used to call New England “The Boston States.’’

 

This will continue. The other good-sized cities in the region – Providence, Worcester  etc., --- will never be able to ‘’compete’’ in a big way with Boston. Rather, they should present themselves as interesting, liveable and less expansive urban satellites of “The Hub.’’

xxx

 

With  “fake news’’  apparently being used more than usual by corrupt and demagogic regimes, George Orwell comes to mind. Many have read his dystopian novel 1984. Much of his other work can be read usefully, especially now, when lying in the public square in America has become so pervasive. In his  famous essay “Politics and the English Language,’’ he writes: ‘’…to think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration; so the fight against bad English is not frivolous and is not the exclusive concern of professional writers.’’

 

And: “Political language — and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists — is designed to make lies sound truthful … and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.’’

 

xxx

 

Continuing praise is due Neil Steinberg, president of the Rhode Island Foundation, for how the RIF is pushing to energize the state’s economy through encouraging innovation and  business start-ups and creating the Partnership for Rhode Island, a group of Rhode Island-based big-business leaders charged with encouraging long-term economic development.

 

It sounds a bit like “The Vault’’ in Boston – some civic-minded corporate bigwigs who used to meet in Boston’s financial district some years ago to discuss how to make Greater Boston more prosperous through addressing a range of such issues as transportation (e.g., building the Big Dig), public education, law enforcement and so on. The Vault’s current incarnation, albeit less romanticized in the press, is The Massachusetts Competitive Partnership.

 

It has long struck me that Rhode Island’s corporate elite has usually not been particularly civic-minded compared to many other places. Perhaps the indefatigable Mr. Steinberg is helping to change that. He told the Providence Business News:

 

“We needed to reinvigorate the engagement of leadership at the top corporate level.  It’s fantastic that we’re the headquarters for CVS, Textron, Hasbro and IGT {formerly GTECH}, but over time  their leadership has had big jobs, traveling all over the country or internationally, and we needed a way to get them engaged (locally).’’

 

xxx

The Newport (R.I.) Daily News reports that a major producer of hydroponic lettuces based in Quebec might build a two-story greenhouse in the city’s North End.

 

The paper said that the company claims to have a proprietary growing technique that it says provides the highest production performance in such settings achieved to date, making it possible to produce 16 to 18 crops a year.

 

It sure beats casinos or another doomed big-box store. If Iceland can grow a lot of vegetables in greenhouses, so can comparatively tropical Rhode Island. How nice it would  be to see all that green through the glass on a cold and gloomy winter’s day.  And wouldn’t it be  dandy to have a bunch of greenhouses atop some of those big old mills in Providence, Pawtucket and elsewhere around here– local, year-round agriculture.


The 50 Greatest Living Rhode Islanders

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.