See Which RI Cities & Towns Rank Poorly for Public Meeting Access, According to ACLU

See Which RI Cities & Towns Rank Poorly for Public Meeting Access, According to ACLU

The ACLU of Rhode Island this week released a report examining the practices of city and town councils and school committees in providing the public remote access to their meetings, and said there was a need for improvement in their practices. 

The report, an update to one the ACLU issued almost two years ago, found that while some public bodies had enhanced their remote access practices since the first report, the public’s ability to monitor and participate remotely in meetings continued to face barriers in many instances.

READ REPORT HERE

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

“Every step towards a more transparent process is a good thing — for each person that can be more involved and informed about what’s happening in the community, and for overall government transparency in our state," said ACLU of RI Communications Associate Zoe Chakoian. "We hope that making information available about how many other councils and committees are providing basic access to meetings and meeting packets will encourage public bodies that don’t already do so to take those next steps.”
 
 

Investigation Findings

According to the ACLU, the report examined four facets of remote access by city and town councils and school committees: whether members of the public could (1) watch meetings remotely; (2) access archived recordings of the meetings; (3) review agenda packets remotely; and (4) participate in meetings remotely. 

The report found that only 12 city and town councils and five school committees met all four of those criteria, while three town councils and two school committees met none of them.  While most of these bodies livestream and archive their meetings, sharing agenda packets and allowing remote participation by the public were less common. In particular, the ACLU’s study found:

33 of 39 city and town councils make livestreaming options available to the public, as do 30 of 34 school committees.

The ACLU noted that large majority of these public bodies offer archived meeting videos for future viewing. Altogether, 35 of 39 city and town councils post recordings of their meetings. On the school committee side, 29 of 34 provide open archived recordings of their meetings to the public.

One school committee – Exeter-West Greenwich – adds an "inappropriate barrier" to viewing by requiring individuals to obtain a password to access recordings of past meetings, said the ACLU. 

While 32 of 39 city and town councils commendably include links to their agenda packets or discussion documents for public access, only a little more than half of the school committees offer the public access to their materials in advance of the meeting.

Few public bodies allow remote participation in meetings by the public, something that was commonplace during the first years of the COVID pandemic. Only 13 city or town councils offer any kind of remote participation options, while nine school committees do so. On the positive side, when the ACLU issued its first report on this topic in 2023, only one school committee had been offering remote participation.

Access to the democratic process should no longer hinge on a person’s physical mobility or their ability to afford a car, get time off work, or find a childcare provider, says the ACLU. If municipal councils and school committees positively address the access issues analyzed in this report, they will be taking important steps in further promoting the Open Meetings Act’s goal of having “public business be performed in an open and public manner.”

 

Cities and Towns in Focus

According to the ACLU:

City and Town Councils offering all four aspects of remote public meeting access and participation: Charlestown, Coventry, Cranston, Cumberland, East Greenwich, Lincoln, Middletown, Pawtucket, Portsmouth, Richmond, Scituate, and West Warwick

School committees offering all four aspects of remote public meeting access and participation: Barrington, East Greenwich, Little Compton, North Smithfield, and Scituate.

Town Councils offering no remote public meeting access in any capacity: Exeter, Foster, and West Greenwich.

School committees offering no remote public meeting access in any capacity: Johnston and New Shoreham.