The Ten Biggest Questions Facing the PawSox Coming to Providence

GoLocalProv News Team and Kate Nagle

The Ten Biggest Questions Facing the PawSox Coming to Providence

The PawSox are slated to leave McCoy under new ownership. What will impact a future in Providence?
What will it take for the new Pawtucket Red Sox owners to build a stadium in Providence?

While it has been a week since the announcement was made that a new ownership group, led by James Skeffington and prominent Rhode Island businessmen, has an interest in bringing the PawSox to Providence, the possibility is raising more questions than answers.  

SLIDES: See the Questions Facing a Potential PawSox Stadium in Providence

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

At the press conference following the announcement, Skeffington did not rule out the possibility of seeking public funding assistance for the construction of a new stadium in Providence.  

"I think what most economists not associated with teams find is that for professional sports, minor league sports is a low economic impact  -- so the amount of public investment should be low," said Victor Matheson, a Holy Cross Economics Professor who specializes in sports economics.  

"That doesn't mean that you don't provide infrastructure, support, so people can get to the stadium efficiently," said Matheson. "But putting a bunch of public money into the stadium to support someone else's business isn't the most prudent use of public funds."

Stadium Support

James Skeffington
The next steps in the potential for the PawSox to come to Providence will be forthcoming, but what is clear is that Providence is being looked at in the context of other options.

"He said basically if it's not Providence, it would be a broader catch area," said Providence City Council President Luis Aponte of his preliminary discussion with Skeffington.

Neil DeMause, who wrote Field of Schemes: How the Great Stadium Swindle Turns Public Money Into Private Profit along with Joanna Cagan, had been highly critical of public funding requests from privately owned sports teams. 

"The best case scenario is that they don’t look for assistance from the city or state. Second best would be that they’d agree to repay any public subsidies with annual rent payments," said DeMause.  "Anything else (trying to claim that tax revenues will go up or the like) is just blowing smoke, as innumerable economists have found no measurable benefit from the presence of sports teams."

Skeffington noted last week that the owners would be conducting an economic impact study in the coming weeks.  

"Owners have the upper hand here for several reasons," said Matheson. "First of all, there are a limited number of baseball franchises, the baseball community uses that as leverage as a way a restaurant can't.  If I don't build you an Olive Garden here, Applebees can just as easily come in --  you don't have the same thing with baseball."

"I don't know how much it matters with minor leagues, but it's easy to get stars in your eyes," continued Matheson. "You make decisions out of the heart and not economic sense. If anyone else besides Curt Schilling said you should give me a bunch of money for a game that hasn't been proven yet, no one would have thought about about pulling the trigger."

"One of the the problems with something like a stadium, it's unusable half of the year.  It's only going to be used as what it's designed to be used for, maybe 60 days a year. It's not a good venue to be used for other stuff.  It's not a good venue for concerts particularly, but they'll play it up as such," said Matheson. "It's designed to watch baseball.  This would lie empty most weeks of the year."

 


The Ten Biggest Questions Facing the PawSox Coming to Providence

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.