Bishop: The Debate Debate

Brian Bishop, GoLocalProv Guest MINDSETTER™

Bishop: The Debate Debate

Matt Brown and Gina Raimondo
More debate has been spilled about debates lately than any other issue in the primary. Of course one can be cynical of the strategic import of decisions to debate or not by any candidates, but one can hardly say in this day and internet age that they require debates to know where the candidates stand. Whether somebody would have been the captain of the debate team in high school hardly qualifies them one way of the other for political office.

In fact, it sounds a bit like the schoolyard out there with people calling each other “cowards” and “liars”; and this reported at a far higher rate than any serious information on candidates. But it seems just as likely that the press with its holier than though attitude is really in the business of stirring up a dramatically uninteresting race rather than actually deliver some incisive contribution to the common cause.

Indeed, the debates I’ve seen organized in Rhode Island (and most other places) aren’t even debates. They are fora where the media preens as much as the candidates. Give me Lincoln Douglas or don’t bother to talk about ‘debates’.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

But of course, it is hardly true that anyone who cares doesn’t know quite a bit about the candidates already. Name an opponent of Gina Raimondo who thinks continuing the Chafee chartered dependency portal, UHIP, was a good idea. And exactly what difference does knowledge of what people say in response to the typical ‘have you stopped beating your wife’ questions make?

Everyone knows that Gina promised an investigation into 38 Studios. Howse that working out for you? Those of us who oppose taxpayer bonds for the Pawsox Stadium because it is not a public good – meaning something used in common - are maybe lucky. If she had followed through and given taxpayers a sense that, whether or not criminally, those who leeched off the 38 Studios deal were publicly embarrassed and reprimanded, the Pawsox might be getting ready for RI Taxpayers money instead of Massachusetts. Such an effort at truth-telling might indeed have combined with the silly rhetoric that the Pawsox Stadium would “pay for itself” to have completed the forced march to this latest corporatist scheme. Instead, people wisely doubted the veracity of those claims.

And then Allan Fung, cornered at one of these forums with Ken Block the last election cycle and stung by criticism that he was too cozy with public unions in Cranston announced his support for Right to Work. Of course, who can be against such a thing, except the unions. Thus was squandered the opportunity that he had to curry favor with union voters upset by Raimondo’s efforts to accomplish unilateral changes to state pensions. But it would have simply been preferable if Allan Fung had walked a harder line with city unions and had thus not teed up the question of whether he bought labor peace with tax dollars. In any event, this kind of revelation was just as likely with campaign ads and rhetoric as debate.

Of course, those running behind want a debate, but when Ken Block got one, it didn’t much advance his run but it was probably amongst the factors that cost Allan Fung the general election. So he’s seen that movie before, why pay to see it again . . . ?

Ditto on the Democratic side. In a close three-way race, Raimondo did debate last cycle. But the debate was probably far less important to the race than the positioning. Two candidates ran left and Raimondo in the wake of pension reform was touting economic chops that looked a bit centrist (as my otherwise antagonist Frymaster at RI Future agreed).

She again has two candidates to her left, but it wouldn’t be a close race even with just one. Much as I respect Spencer Dickinson’s insistence that he wouldn’t budget to pay 38 Studios bonds that were never guaranteed by the state, it’s meaningless because the legislature would just put the money back. But he won’t win the primary anyway, not because of the lack of debate, but just the perception of relative heft and outsider status. Sure, being seen on the same stage with Governor Gina confers some small measure of antidote to that, with the emphasis on small.

Bob Healey spent a lifetime at it just so he could be a serious also-ran instead of a laughing stock. And it was the denouement of that career that least impressed me, although I think it was labor -- the robust support of the trades for Gina even while lackluster and indecision ruled in the public employee unions  -- and not moose hunting that elected Raimondo the last time.

Fine, the quartet of also-ran characters can run around calling their opponents cowards, but where does Joe Trillo get off doing that. Why doesn’t someone ask Joe Trillo why he was too much of a coward to run in the Republican primary? Seems to me, he just wants the also-rans to soften up the primary target so he can further weaken Allan Fung in the general election which appears to be his raison d’etre in running since he also has little chance of winning.

There is nothing wrong with having a platform and running, but there is a head in the sand quality when one doesn’t concede what the likely outcome of their candidacy on the race is. But Trillo is, of course, what the press finds missing in this race, a bombastic character with ideas. My problem is I’m not particularly fond of his ideas. I saw him quite capably carry water for Deepwater Wind and National Grid who have opened permanent IVs into ratepayers wallets. So yes, he knows some things, but it's funny where that knowledge conveniently stops in order to support the position he is taking at the time.

No, I don’t love any of the candidates for Governor and fall amongst those whose preference, as for many in the last election, is someone different than who we’ve got. I’ll spend my time thinking who that could actually be and not debating debates.

Brian Bishop is on the board of OSTPA and has spent 20 years of activism protecting property rights, over-regulation and perverse incentives in tax policy.

GoLocal Statewide Poll - Conducted by Harvard's Della Volpe - June, 2018

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.