Guest MINDSETTER™ Rep. Hull: Time for Providence to Reestablish Residency
Guest MINDSETTER™ Rep. Ray Hull
Guest MINDSETTER™ Rep. Hull: Time for Providence to Reestablish Residency
Living in Providence means I don’t only see the city’s residents at their worst moments, when they’ve been the victim of a crime or made a choice that led to them being arrested. Instead, they’re the neighbors I see at church, at the grocery store, and when we shovel our driveways together after a storm. When they need my help, I’m here and can quickly address their concerns. More importantly, people know they can approach me because I’m a neighbor, not a stranger in a blue uniform. This wouldn’t happen if I worked from nine to five then drove home to the suburbs.
Unfortunately, most city employees didn’t make the same choice I did. Sixty-five percent of municipal workers, and 82% of the police and fire department, live somewhere else. Right now, the public safety commissioner takes his salary of over $155,000 home to pay property taxes in Cranston where he resides. Providence’s police chief takes his money to East Greenwich, while the Director of Emergency Management takes his paycheck home to Portsmouth.
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLASTI know from personal experience that Providence’s employees are devoted to their jobs, but there is no substitute for residency to make city workers true stakeholders in our city’s success. The mayor and state legislature need to reexamine the residency requirement for city workers. This was the law until 2005 and changing it was a big mistake by Rhode Island’s lawmakers.
Government functions best when it’s employees are personally invested in the community they serve. A residency requirement would make Providence’s workforce more diverse without having to resort to hiring quotas or controversial affirmative action plans. Additionally, when city workers pay the taxes that fund their salaries and benefits, unions are more likely to weigh the financial impacts of their demands instead of viewing city taxpayers as an ATM that will never run out of money. The city pays generous salaries and good benefits. It’s only fair that the money stays in our economy rather than going to places like Cranston, Barrington, East Greenwich, and other communities.
Residency requirements would immediately reduce income inequality in Providence. In my lifetime, I’ve seen a lot of positive change here in the capital city. But at the same time, our middle-class has been hollowed out just like most major cities, especially in the last decade. There are increasingly two Providences – one for wealthy professionals and another for low-income residents struggling to make ends meet. Keeping middle-class municipal jobs in our city would help change that dynamic
As a candidate for mayor, Jorge Elorza vowed to require all his department heads to live in Providence. Instead, the mayor’s actions haven’t lived up to his promises. Many of his directors, including the leadership of Public Safety, Public Works, and the Emergency Management Department, live outside the city. The most recent class of police academy recruits, the first one under Mayor Elorza, draws only a third of its members from city residents. Of that third, many will leave Providence as soon as they become police officers. The same pattern will be true of the new firefighters and teachers hired by Elorza’s administration. Regrettably, his campaign trail commitment was just empty rhetoric.
Residency works. It makes city workers invested in the community they serve. It boosts the city’s economy and reduces income inequality. Unions ask for more reasonable contracts since their members pay the taxes that fund their salaries. Residency is an idea whose time has come.
2016 Common Cause Legislative Rankings
Final Score 68%
Marvin Abney
District: 73
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: no votes
Open Government: 67%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 21
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 2
Final Score 72%
Mia Ackerman
District: 45
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: no votes
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 81%
Edith Ajello
District: 1
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 25
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5
Did not Vote: 2
Final Score: 63%
Joseph Almeida
District: 12
Party: D
Ethics: 0%
Campaign Elections: 50%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 18
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 7
Final Score: 72%
Gregg Amore
District: 65
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Samuel Azzinaro
District: 37
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Jean Barros
District: 59
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
David Bennett
District: 20
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Christopher Blazejewski
District: 2
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Dennis Canario
District: 71
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 56%
John Carnevale
District: 13
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 0%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 33%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 16
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 7
Final Score: 72%
Lauren Carson
District: 75
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
PHOTO: laurencarson.com
Final Score: 72%
Stephen Casey
District: 50
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 78%
Michael Chippendale
District: 40
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 50%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 25
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 68%
Arthur Corvese
District: 55
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 50%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 21
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 84%
Doreen Costa
District: 31
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 100%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 27
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Gregory Costantino
District: 44
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 51%
David Coughlin Jr.
District: 60
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 38%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 14
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 9
Final Score: 72%
Robert Craven, Sr.
District: 32
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
John DeSimone
District: 5
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 68%
Grace Diaz
District: 11
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 50%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 21
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 2
Final Score: 72%
John Edwards
District: 70
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 64%
Deborah Fellella
District: 43
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 25%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 19
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 8
Did not Vote: 5
Final Score: 66%
Blake Filippi
District: 36
Party: I
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 38%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 0%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 21
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 11
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 65%
Raymond Gallison Jr.
District: 69
Party: D
Ethics: 0%
Campaign Elections: 81%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 50%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 13
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 78%
Antonio Giarrusso
District: 30
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 63%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 33%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 25
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Arthur Handy
District: 18
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 78%
Joy Hearn
District: 66
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 25
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Raymond Hull
District: 6
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 56%
Robert Jacquard
District: 17
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 13%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 16
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 7
Final Ranking: 72%
Raymond Johnston Jr.
District: 61
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Katherine Kazarian
District: 63
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Cale Keable
District: 47
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Brian Kennedy
District: 38
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 0%
Donald Lally
District: 33
Party: D
Ethics: 0%
Campaign Elections: 0%
Judicial Reform: 0%
Open Government: 50%
Separation of Government: 0%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 0
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 3
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 78%
Robert Lancia
District: 16
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 63%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 33%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 25
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Charlene Lima
District: 14
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
John Lombardi
District: 8
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Ranking: 63 %
Karen MacBeth
District: 52
Party: R
Ethics: 0%
Campaign Elections: 25%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 0%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 17
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5
Did not Vote: 10
Final Score: 72%
Shelby Maldonado
District: 56
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 75%
Jan Malik
District: 67
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6
Did not Vote: 3
Final Score: 84%
Michael Marcello
District: 41
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 27
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 59%
Kenneth Marshall
District: 68
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 13%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 33%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 17
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 6
Final Score: 72%
Nichola Mattiello
District: 15
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 74%
Carol Hagen McEntee
District: 33
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 38%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 50%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 17
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6
Did not Vote: 0
PHOTO: Independentri.com
Final Score: 72%
Daniel McKiernan
District: 7
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
PHOTO: Twitter
Final Score: 79%
James McLaughlin
District: 57
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 100%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 25
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6
Did not Vote: 1
Final Score: 72%
Joseph McNamara
District: 19
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Hello Melo
District: 64
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Mary Messier
District: 62
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 79%
Patricia Morgan
District: 26
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 63%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 33%
Separation of Government: 0%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 24
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5
Did not Vote: 3
Final Score: 72%
Michael Morin
District: 49
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 84%
Robert Nardolillo
District: 28
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 100%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 27
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 61%
Eileen Naughton
District: 21
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 13
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 19
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 10
Did not Vote: 3
Final Score: 62%
Brian Newberry
District: 48
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 25%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 19
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 10
Did not Vote: 3
Final Score: 78%
Jared Nunes
District: 25
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 25
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
William O'Brien
District: 54
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Jeremiah O'Grady
District: 46
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 45%
Thomas Palangio
District: 3
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 38%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 100%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes:11
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6
Did not Vote: 15
Final Score: 59%
Robert Phillips
District: 51
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 25%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 19
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 13
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 70%
Justin Price
District: 39
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 50%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 0%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 22
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 1
Final Score: 74%
Aaron Regunberg
District: 4
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7
Did not Vote: 2
Final Score: 70%
Daniel Reilly
District: 72
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 63%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 22
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 1
Final Score: 69%
Sherry Roberts
District: 29
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 63%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 22
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 10
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Deborah Ruggiero
District: 74
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Patricia Serpa
District: 27
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Joseph Shekarchi
District: 23
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 73%
Scott Slater
District: 10
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 8
Did not Vote: 1
Final Score: 72%
Joseph Solomon Jr.
District: 22
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Teresa Ann Tanzi
District: 34
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 70%
Carlos Tobon
District: 58
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 63%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 22
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 1
Final Score: 69%
Joseph Trillo
District: 24
Party: R
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 63%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 33%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 21
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 8
Did not Vote: 3
Final Score: 62%
Stephen Ucci
District: 42
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 0%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 17
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6
Did not Vote: 9
Final Score: 72%
Anastasia Williams
District: 9
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
Final Score: 72%
Thomas Winfield
District: 53
Party: D
Ethics: 100%
Campaign Elections: 75%
Judicial Reform: 100%
Open Government: 0%
Separation of Government: 100%
Pro Common Cause Votes: 23
Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9
Did not Vote: 0
