“They don’t want you to vote. If they did, we wouldn’t vote on a Tuesday. In November, you ever throw a party on a Tuesday? No. Because nobody would come.” – Chris Rock
On May 5th 2015 a special Primary election was held in South Kingston and Narragansett for State Representative Donald J. Lally’s seat in the 33rd district of Rhode Island. Voter turnout was minimal as always. Nothing exceptional about the election held on a typical Tuesday during the workweek.
Wait a second, why is Election Day on a Tuesday? Doesn’t this just depress voter turnout? Something feels wrong here. Let me explain.
Tuesday as an Election Day originates back to an obsolete statutory law from 1845. Congress mandated Presidential elections be held on a Tuesday. Farmers needed – again in 1845 -- to travel via horse and buggy into town to vote (important note: a uniformed date, and day, Tuesday, is not mandated in the Constitution).
Farmers couldn’t travel on the Sabbath, a Sunday, the Christian day of rest and worship and farmers also needed to be back on Wednesday because that was market day. Travel took almost a day.
So Congress adopted Presidential Election Day as a Tuesday following the first Monday in November, in years divisible by four. November was chosen because the harvest was near complete, and the intense snow fall had yet to begin.
Eventually, in 1872, Congress adopted the same uniform, biennial Tuesday, divisible by two, for US House elections, and US Senate staggered elections to 1) reduce undue influence 2) streamline the voting process.
During this period, Congress was concerned the same person could vote in several states, and one election could adversely impact of the result of another, adopting a uniformed day, Tuesday, was reasonable. Farmers had enough time to vote and make it back for market day.
Make sense to you? If you are living in 1845, it should.
Traditional Tuesdays
For simplification, Rhode Island mandated that state elections occur at the same time as congressional elections (excluding special elections) the “second Tuesday after the first Monday” in September, for primaries, and November, for general elections.
However, state special elections, and referendums are exempt from the Tuesday requirement. Looking at the upcoming elections, all special elections and referendums fall on a Tuesday.
Why? From the Rhode Island secretary of state’s office down to the respective towns, no one was sure. After all my probing, no rational explanation existed other than it was simply “tradition.” Tragically, voter turnout in South Kingston and Narragansett was minimal; someone could even be elected with only 15 or 20 votes.
Screw It
Voting has reached abysmal levels. In the last midterm election, nationwide, only 36.4 of the voting-eligible population cast a ballot, the lowest since World War II. In Rhode Island, it was slightly higher around 40% of the voting-eligible population cast a ballot.
Part is ennui and disenchantment. Politics is just not fun, doesn’t have the excitement of a football game. Also, people are fed up with the money that is pouring into politics. People just don’t think their vote matters.
Another part is a complete lack of time. In Rhode Island, on Tuesday, during the workweek, polls open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 8:00 p.m. People typically work two or more jobs because income inequality is so high, and economic mobility is stagnating. The average workweek in the US is 47 hours. De facto, with Tuesday the exclusive day for voting, this disenfranchises millions each year.
That’s the way politicians like it. Job security is an important thing to a vain, egoistical, insecure politician. So voters just say screw it.
Voter Enlargement
We need an electoral calendar designed for the 21st century.
At the federal level, Vermont’s US Senator Bernie Sanders introduced a brilliant piece of legislation making Election Day a holiday. This was snubbed by all of Rhode Island’s federal delegation, and eventually, quietly died in committee.
However, at the state level, there is hope. In a stroke of genius, some members of the Rhode Island General Assembly introduced a legislative package that would increase voter participation: H-6051 and S-0821. This package would expand the voting window to include weekend voting, and allow people to register to vote online 24/7. Don’t worry though; these bills probably won’t go anywhere. They make too much sense.
In addition, there are a couple more ideas. Rhode Island could make a regular Election Day a civic holiday just like Delaware or New York. For special elections, Rhode Island can keep Election Day as traditionally Tuesday, but expand the window. Also, we should allow people to register at the last minute in person.
We need to stop the obsession with Election Day Tuesdays. It discourages voter turnout, and makes little sense in this modern age. In Rhode Island, we should expand the vote, not depress it. We are already depressed enough as a state. Having Election Day exclusively on Tuesday is not the answer.
Matt Fecteau ([email protected]), of Pawtucket, lost to U.S. Rep. David Cicilline in last year’s Democratic primary. He was a White House national security intern and captain in the US Army with two tours to Iraq. Twitter: @MatthewFecteau
Surprise Winners and Losers for 2014 Election
Winner
Gina Raimondo
Smashed the Glass Ceiling
Raimondo is the perfect candidate. Local girl, brilliant education and success in the private sector. Next up, she was elected General Treasurer in 2010 and made history and caused a major uproar with the most powerful unions by leading the charge for pension reform.
In the Democratic primary, Raimondo raised a tremendous war chest and caught a big break when Bob Walsh, RI National Education Association's boss, and other union officials put Clay Pell up to beat Raimondo and it had the opposite effect. It split the anti-Raimondo vote between Providence Mayor Angel Taveras and Pell.
Now, Raimondo has made Rhode Island history. Where Betty Leonard and Myrth York failed, Raimondo has smashed the glass ceiling.
Winner
Democratic Party
Slapped the GOP Silly
It was a beat down. A throw in the towel. A Brady vs Manning moment.
Despite 80% of Rhode Islanders believing that the state is on the "wrong track" - Rhode Islanders gave the Democratic Party a series of sweeping victories.
All four members of the Congressional Delegation are Democrats - three returned by more than 20% margin Tuesday night. All five members of the General Officers are now Democrats. The Providence Mayor is a Democrat with the election of Jorge Elorza and the GOP barely made an impact on the Democrats overwhelming control on the General Assembly.
How bad was it for the GOP? Fung only received 36% of the vote, Taylor only 33% in her effort for Lt. Governor, John Carlevale who barely ran a campaign scored 39% of the popular vote and Hodgson only captured 43% of the vote for AG. The GOP did not run a candidate for General Treasurer.
Game, set, match to the Democrats.
Winner
Jorge Elorza
Out of Nowhere
He never had run for office before. He started the effort with zero name recognition. He fought his way through a crowded Democratic primary and ultimately defeated one of America’s most celebrated and infamous politicians - Vincent “Buddy” Cianci, Jr.
Elorza is now faced with a city with tremendous challenges and the need for on the job training at record speed.
He ran nearly flawless campaigns in the primary and the general - now the hard part - he has to govern.
Winner
East Side of Providence
King Maker
Elorza's victory by 3375 votes was fueled by an overwhelming advantage on the East Side, where he tallied 4758 more votes than the former mayor - Cianci - out of 9263 total votes, a remarkable advantage of 52.4%.
His 74.7% to 22.3% East Side advantage bested huge pluralities there in previous elections. Elorza actually bettered his East Side advantage he garnered against Michael Solomon there in his September Democratic primary victory, 68.25% to 25.6%. The East Side, which started Buddy Cianci's political career by supporting him in his initial mayoral run in 1974, has probably ended it with this overwhelming rejection of his candidacy.
Winner
Robert Healey
Moderate Party Disrupter
Imagine this: a multi-timed failed candidate who raises no money and he organizes no campaign, yet he wins 22% of the vote. The winner, Gina Raimondo only won only 40% of the total vote. Imagine if he tried.
Healey may have been the skunk at the picnic for Fung as the combined Fung and Healey vote received 58% of the vote. Raimondo's 40% popular vote is just a tad higher than what Chafee won with in 2010.
Winner
McKee and Ed Reform
Beat the Unions (Twice)
Dan McKee has been the champion of education reform. He has looked the most powerful union - NEARI - squarely in the eyes and not blinked. While the unions went all in to beat him in the primary he split the three-way and won.
Then, in the General Election, the unions threw their support at Catherine Taylor, a Republican and he defeated her soundly (54% to 33%). Now, McKee can push a focused education reform agenda in 2015 through the General Assembly.
Now, neither the Governor nor the Lt. Governor owe anything to the public sector education unions.
Loser
Joe Paolino
Sweep of a Double Header
The former Mayor and Ambassador to Malta had another bad election day. Paolino not only lost on the ballot question in Newport that would have made his investment group’s purchase of Newport Grand a reality, but Paolino also saw former mayor Vincent “Buddy” Cianci lose his comeback bid to regain Providence’s top job.
Paolino’s group promised to invest millions into the Newport Grand facility and produced a plan that would have saved the jobs at the facility that are now in jeopardy, and would have also added at least $1 million per year into Newport’s municipal coffers. But voters, many of which were fatigued from having been asked to approve table games at Newport Grand just two years prior, rejected the measure. Scores of Newport residents have long resented the facility being located in their backyard and won’t shed much of a tear if the facility were to shut down.
Paolino and Cianci started off as political rivals, but have developed a close friendship over the last 10-15 years beginning when Cianci ran into trouble with the federal government. To a large extent, it was Paolino who convinced and lobbied Cianci to throw his hat into the mayoral ring this year.
These losses add to a painful run of elections for Paolino over the span of the last 3 decades. Paolino’s last electoral victory was in 1986, when he was reelected Mayor of Providence. Since then, he ran for Governor in 1990, but was defeated by former Governor Bruce Sundlun. In 2002, he ran for Mayor of Providence as an independent, but was defeated by David Cicilline. He flirted with running for Mayor in 2010, but decided against it.
Make no mistake about it: with these two losses, this election cycle was another loss for Paolino.
Loser
Ken Block and the Moderate Party
Reform Party Becomes Dems Best Friend
When Moderate Party founder Ken Block envisioned the entity, he saw it as a mechanism to reform Rhode Island’s government. Four years later, Block will be the first to admit that his goal has been an unmitigated and dismal failure. If anything, his dream has turned into a nightmare.
In 2010, it’s almost a certainty that Ken Block’s candidacy as the Moderate Party Candidate doomed Republican John Robitaille’s chances to become Governor. Both Block and Robitaille were running on reform agendas.
This year, Robert Healey, as the Moderate Party’s standard bearer, won more than 22 percent of the vote this year—effectively giving the Governor’s office to Gina Raimondo. That means, in two consecutive gubernatorial elections, the moderate party has effectively stopped the Republican Party, which aims to reform state government, from winning the election.
Going forward, reform-minded citizens in Rhode Island need to gather together around one party with one standard-bearer if they’re going to enact the reforms they believe will improve the state.
Loser
Constitutional Convention
Message Missing
The Constitutional Convention was promoted by good government advocates as a method for the state to enact good government reforms that could fundamentally change the way Rhode Island ‘s government functions.
A Constitutional Convention would have been convened after a special election was held in each of the state’s 75 representative districts. Each district would select one individual to represent the portion of the population at the convention. The representatives would then have recommended changes to the constitution, which would have then become questions before the voters. If the voters approved the changes, the constitution would have been amended.
The advocates argued that the convention could have been a good mechanism to reform government by giving the governor’s office more power in the form of a line-item veto. The Convention would have also been a mechanism to implement term limits on state legislators as well as an opportunity to implement ethics reform that would have held state legislators to the same ethical standards as every other statewide and local office holder.
Opponents claimed that the Convention could have have been easily hijacked by outside special interest groups that could have used the Convention to limit individual freedoms such as women’s and minority rights.
In the end, the opponents won out, but it remains unclear if the ballot question failed due to voter opposition to the matter or simple confusion. If voters did not really understand what was really at stake with respect to a Convention, they may very well have simply rejected it offhand.
Loser
The RI-GOP
See Democrats - Winners
It’s a fair question to ask what circumstances it would take for the Rhode Island Republican Party to make any gains in the state of Rhode Island.
In a year that represented a Republican wave nationally, in which the Republicans took control of the United States Senate, and the increased its margin in the House of Representatives, the Rhode Island GOP failed to win any statewide seats, and also failed to make significant gains in the state legislature.
Unfortunately for the GOP, many analysts believed the 2014 election cycle held significant promise for the GOP both the top of the ticket as well as the in the legislature. Neither became a reality for the Republicans.
As much as good government folks say that the state government should have a functioning two party system, it’s difficult to see when and how that dream could actually become a reality at this point given this year’s electoral disappointment.
Loser
National Education Association
From First to Worst
Despite the fact that the Democratic Party scored huge victories, the 2014 elections will go down as a painful election cycle for the Rhode Island National Education Association.
That’s because the two state top state office holders, Governor-elect Gina Raimondo and Lieutenant Governor-elect Daniel McKee are both known as a pension reformer and an education reformer/charter school advocate respectively. Those two positions are probably the two biggest affronts to the NEA’s statewide agenda. Pension reform, spearheaded by Raimondo, saw pension benefits for current and even retired teachers slashed. Charter schools, and the education reform they represent, will likely decrease NEA’s ranks because charter school teachers are typically not unionized.
To a large extent, the NEA shot itself in the foot this election cycle by overplaying its hand. In the Democratic Primary, the NEA refused to back Providence Mayor Angel Taveras because he supported charter schools. They then recruited Clay Pell, the grandson of former Senator Claiborne Pell to run in the Democratic Primary. Pell split the public sector union vote with Taveras and gave Raimondo the opening she needed to prevail in the election.
After weeks of deliberation following the Democratic Primary, the NEA decided to back Raimondo in the Governor’s race, but astute political observers knew the endorsement was, at best, half-hearted. Cranston Mayor Allan Fung had already said he wanted to see Rhode Island become a “right to work” state, meaning union members wouldn’t be forced to join a union of they didn’t so choose. That left the union with little choice but to begrudgingly back Raimondo.
The NEA however passed on endorsing McKee, instead backing Republican Catherine Taylor for Lieutenant Governor. Taylor lost the election by a stunning margin of almost 20 percent. That question will likely have political observers wondering if the NEA’s clout has diminished.
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Translation service unavailable. Please try again later.