Moore: Statewide Teacher Contract Will Benefit RI

Russell J. Moore, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™

Moore: Statewide Teacher Contract Will Benefit RI

It was disappointing to see the comments from well-meaning Rhode Island leaders and policy wonks opposing and pouring cold water over the idea of a statewide teacher contract in last Friday's GoLocal article on the issue. 

A statewide teacher contract would undoubtedly lower the cost of education in Rhode Island by realizing cost savings due to economies of scale through purchasing health insurance and other items, as well as make certain that the taxpayers have more seasoned negotiators working on their behalf. 

Misguided Rationale

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Yet despite that fact, good, decent guys like former Republican Gubernatorial candidate Ken Block, former Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council Executive Director and state Director of Administration Gary Sasse, all attempted to pour cold water on the idea of the statewide teacher contract, claiming it would undermine local control of schools and perhaps end up costing money.

Here's the thing: believe it or not, the state government in Rhode Island, on the whole has been more fiscally responsible than the local governments. Yes, like any other general truth, there are expectations to the rule. But on the whole, it holds up.

The most striking example of this dynamic that sticks out in my mind took place in 2007 when I was a news reporter writing for The Warwick Beacon. The city of Warwick went out to bid for the administration of its self-insured health care plan. United Health Care bid more than $1 million less than Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island. Yet amidst heavy pressure from the city's union members, the city council caved and spent more than $1 million than they needed to. 

Local Governments Are Not More Responsible

There are plenty of other examples. Local communities in Rhode Island like Providence, Warwick, Pawtucket, and others, on a per capita basis, have much higher legacy liabilities (pension, health care, etc.) for their current employees and retirees. Yet statewide pension reform was significant and more effective than any pension reform we've seen on a local level. 

Here's the moral of the story: while Mike Stenhouse from the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity extols the supposed virtues of local government, as he did in Friday's GoLocal article, it's actually easier for special interest groups to influence smaller governments than larger governments. That's the reason why state and local workers have better pensions and benefits than federal workers. 

This is true for two reasons. First, there is actually more transparency at higher levels of government, like state and federal government. That's because there are more people paying attention to it. There is more media coverage. People are generally more knowledgeable. When people are paying attention, it's harder to make backroom deals.

More Transparency Around State Government

Secondly, the people at higher level of government are more seasoned negotiators. Robert Healey, who ran for Governor as the Moderate Party candidate in last year's election made the point rather astutely during the campaign. 
"...school boards are usually the first step on a political ladder. Many who run for office are of the ilk that are former school teachers or their relatives...” said Healey during the campaign. "The unions, when negotiating contracts, send in negotiators. These negotiators, having negotiated several contracts across the state, are no match for the lambs sitting on the school board."

Further, since many of the politicians serving on the local school committees harbor ambitions of rising up the political ladder, it stands to reason that they'll be generous with the public treasury to make friends with the powerful union officials, who can rally people to support them at the ballot box. The people who are forced to pay for this scheme, are too busy working two jobs and raising families to pay attention.

Sunlight is Key

There is far more press on the statewide level. A statewide teacher contract would be infinitely more transparent than the local teacher contracts. Sunlight is the best disinfectant to corruption--and not just the illegal kind of corruption. That alone is another great reason to enact a statewide contract. 

All these reasons indicate why the reformers in Rhode Island should be rallying around a statewide teacher contract as opposed to being negative about the idea. This state needs good government reforms like blood, and it's a shame to see reformers not getting behind good ideas just because they weren't their own. 

Russell Moore has worked on both sides of the desk in RI media, both on political campaigns and for newspapers. Send him email at [email protected] Follow him on twitter @russmoore713.ima

Teacher Absences in RI

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.