Multiple 6/10 Lawsuits and Investigations Creating Pile of Legal Issues for Attorney General

GoLocalProv

Multiple 6/10 Lawsuits and Investigations Creating Pile of Legal Issues for Attorney General

RI Attorney General Peter Neronha PHOTO: GoLocal
In September of 2020, GoLocal first unveiled that the Rhode Island Department of Transportation's (RIDOT) lead contractor on the 6/10 connector project had brought hundreds of tons of contaminated material and dumped it in the Olneyville neighborhood of Providence. Since then, federal and state investigations have been ongoing for upwards of 14 months and, now, civil cases are beginning to be filed.

When the neighbors who live adjacent to the site where the contaminated material was dumped filed a lawsuit against the RIDOT, it would be standard for the Rhode Island Attorney General's office to defend RIDOT.

But, not in this case. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha is investigating RIDOT and the state's contractor for the 6/10 project Barletta Engineering/Heavy Machine, the Massachusetts-based firm for their roles in the dumping of contaminated soil and other issues.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Carmonas' lawsuit against State of RI, RIDOT and Neronha
Neronha's spokesperson Kristy dosReis said in a statement to GoLocal, "The Office has an ongoing criminal investigation involving the Route 6/10 connector project." 

"Like any state agency, DOT, once sued, may by state law request that this Office represents them in a civil action. State law requires that this Office represent the agency. However, a potential, actual or apparent conflict may arise under a variety of scenarios, including those where the Office has an ongoing criminal investigation involving the same general subject matter as the civil suit against the state agency," added dosReis.

Piles of contaminated soil, 6/10 project PHOTO: GoLocal
"As only this Office can conduct a criminal investigation in the State of Rhode Island, such criminal investigations take priority over defending a state agency in a related civil action. The practice in such instances is for outside, private 'conflict counsel' to be immediately appointed to represent the state agency in the civil action. From that point forward, this Office is not involved in the civil case involving the state agency.  This scenario arises fairly often, and there are any number of examples where this approach has been utilized," said dosReis.

"Consistent with this practice, this Office will not represent DOT in connection with the Route 6/10 connector project. The agency will be represented by outside, private conflict counsel. This Office will have no involvement in that lawsuit," said dosReis.

Counsel for the neighbors suing RIDOT -- the Providence law firm DarrowEverett -- was unaware that Neronha's office had decided to shift the defense of the lawsuit to an outside counsel. 


TIMELINE: 6/10 Contamination GoLocal Investigation

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.