Judge Turns Down Wells Fargo's Request for 38 Studios Redactions

GoLocalProv News Team

Judge Turns Down Wells Fargo's Request for 38 Studios Redactions

Superior Court Judge Michael Silverstein, pictured on Tuesday.
Wells Fargo's request to have 215 words redacted from the upcoming release of 38 Studios court documents was rejected in Superior Court Tuesday morning.

Following the filing of a "motion to maintain confidentiality" at 4:15 p.m. on Monday, Wells Fargo lawyer Robert Duffy maintained before Judge Michael Silverstein on Tuesday that as the parties had originally operated "under the auspices" of being able to claim confidentiality during the lawsuit proceedings in certain instances -- and that "deposition testimony was given identifying certain information relative to certain clients having nothing to do with 38 Studios," that Wells Fargo was seeking to redact only names -- and not the context of the questions and answers -- as thousands of pages of court document are set to be released to the public.   

SLIDES:  See the Players in the 38 Studios Saga BELOW

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Lawyers with the EDC countered that burden of proof was on Wells Fargo to prove that the names were in fact confidential, and not obtainable publicly in municipal bond documents online regarding other revenue bond deals involving Wells Fargo, that were brought up during the court proceedings.  Furthermore, the EDC posed the question that should Wells Fargo have been able to show "some degree" of burden of proof, "should Wells Fargo's interest outweigh the public's interest."

Judge Silverstein said at the culmination of both sides' arguments that the burden of proof had "not been sustained" -- and the court is going to order no redactions in the Wells Fargo' motion considered on Tuesday.


SLIDES: The Players in the 38 Studios Saga

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.