Robert Whitcomb: Amazonian Ocean State? Immigration Ambiguities; Block Island Police Logs

Robert Whitcomb, Columnist

Robert Whitcomb: Amazonian Ocean State? Immigration Ambiguities; Block Island Police Logs

Robert Whitcomb

“Departing summer hath assumed

An aspect tenderly illumed,
The gentlest look of spring;
That calls from yonder leafy shade
Unfaded, yet prepared to fade,
A timely carolling.’’

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

 

 “September,’’ by William Wordsworth

 

“Avoid pronouncing the phrases everyone else does. Think up your own way of speaking, even if only to convey that thing you think everyone is saying. Make an effort to separate yourself from the Internet. Read books.’’

 

--From On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons From the Twentieth Century, by historian Timothy Snyder.

 

On the news that Rhode Island officials are pitching to Amazon the idea that the behemoth should put its proposed “second headquarters’’ in the Ocean State, with tens of thousands of employees to be hired for it over the next decade: The company, of course, is very unlikely to choose Little Rhody for such a facility, but if the company does, almost incredibly, do just that or at least decides to set up a major operation in Rhode Island, it would probably be in the northern part, with relatively quick access to the Boston high-tech and higher-education colossus. That’s not to say that Amazon would not also seek connections with, especially, Brown, URI, Bryant and the Rhode Island School of Design. One other possibility, given the reported size of the project – Quonset, which has the attraction of having its own airport.

 

xxx

 

DOT Signs
I have admired the very unusual honesty of the signs at Rhode Island’s “RhodeWorks’’  road- and bridge-repair projects. They actually say how over budget and delayed certain projects are! Unusual transparency indeed.

 

xxx

 

For all his bluster, President Trump is a remarkably weak leader. His decision-making style is chaotic, impulsive and awash in contradictions. That’s in large part because he has no perceptible principles. Rather, Mr. Id is dominated by a pathological desire to be seen as a “winner,’’ which may be why he has had no big wins yet as president. That’s unless you want to include the confirmation of right-wing judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court after the Senate changed long-entrenched rules to permit him to be confirmed by a simple majority instead of the traditional 60 votes.

 

The latest example of Trump’s style, if you can call it that, is his decision to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals  (DACA) program unless Congress acts to save it within six months. What a punt! This covers people who were brought into the U.S. illegally as children; many are now young adults. The president’s move contradicts his campaign promise – very important to his angry, adoring base – that he’d axe the program once he took over the White House.  Now he’s thrown the mess into the laps of congressional Republicans. They’ll be traumatized by the experience.

 

That’s because the most enthusiastic, nativist part of the party wants severe cutbacks in immigration while much of the traditional, business-loving part loves immigration – even virtually uncontrolled immigration—because it provides so much cheap labor and suppresses American wages and, yes, also because it has brought in some very good workers, some of whom inevitably have been technologically and otherwise innovative. After all, these are young people, and so presumably at the height of their energy, productivity, and creativity.

 

 

Interestingly, Trump, despite his vociferous campaign rhetoric, now says he “loves’’ the people unctuously called “Dreamers,’’ although he calls the Obama administration program an unconstitutional overreach of presidential power – which I think it clearly is. What Obama did should have been done by statute, not administrative order.

 

Many nonrich Red State Republicans (the core of Trump rally attendees) hate DACA and want the whole thing abolished while big campaign contributors love it. The bumpy road ahead for the Republican caucuses on Capitol Hill just got bumpier.

 

This latest immigration controversy has been mired in touching human-interest stories that tend to obscure the ambiguities of the issue. Yes, immigration enriches America in many ways (including the immigrants from Siberia who came over more than 10,000 years ago and are now called Native Americans) – culturally and in some ways economically and technologically. But the flood of illegal immigrants (now much reduced), most of them low-skilled, has also kept down average wages – especially for lower-income citizens – laid a heavy burden of new social-service costs on some jurisdictions, complicated law enforcement and weakened the power of unions to promote a middle-class standard of living for millions of Americans. (Nervous illegal aliens are unlikely to risk joining a union, let  alone help to organize one.)

 

And on the DACA issue, those who side with the “Dreamers’’ should bear in mind that continuation of the program as is would tend to encourage more illegal immigration by parents seeking a better future for their children.

 

Still, these young people didn’t come here on their own volition. The vast majority want to stay here because is what they know and life in the U.S., with all its flaws, is still a lot more promising than where their families came from. Most of these young people are quite integrated into American society. It would be grossly unfair to ship them back because their parents brought them here illegally.

 

But the Republican-controlled Congress has shown little inclination or ability to enact new and comprehensive immigration laws that fairly address these issues. I think that rather than try to come up with broad immigration reform next year, they’ll do what Trump has basically done – try to kick it down the road to beyond the 2018 congressional elections. 

 

And I’d guess that Trump’s “Beautiful Border Wall’’ to keep out illegals will not be built anytime soon: We first must repair the hurricane damage in East Texas and Florida – both Republican states. It’s remarkable how fast conservative or “libertarian’’ GOP politicians lose their love of fiscal austerity when their constituents get whomped by a natural disaster. Then they quickly become temporary socialists. And if some of their pals get some of the government contracts in the cleanup, so much the better.

 

xxx

 

President Donald Trump
Given President Trump’s ignorance, incoherence, and instability, wouldn’t it be nice if a bipartisan group of congressional leaders could take on some of the administrative roles now at the White House?

 

Historian Robert Kagan, a conservative, in a piece in The Washington Post, notes that there is historical precedent for this, right after the Civil War. At the end of his piece, he writes:

 

“Could Republicans possibly agree to such an arrangement? The party’s leaders should at least think about it. Trump ran against them in 2016 and is now once again firing up his base to attack them. Party leaders do have another option besides being Trump punching bags — depriving him of as much power as possible while they can. It’s a risky strategy, but a little bravery in the short term might pay off later. Is there any bravery to be found in Congress? Or as the great Radical Republican congressman Thaddeus Stevens asked in the spring of 1865, ‘Can’t we collect bold men enough to lay the foundation for a party to take the helm of this government and keep it off the rocks?”’ He was referring to the incompetent President Andrew Johnson.

 

Hit this link:

 

 

xxx

 

Taxes
Then there’s tax reform. Trump wants to cut the corporate tax, saying that it’s much higher than in most of the nations we trade with.

 

But that’s a dubious assertion. While the official top corporate rate is 35 percent – nominally the third-highest corporate top marginal rate in the world, few companies pay that.  (Trump wants to cut the rate to 15 percent.)  Indeed, in recent years after-tax corporate profits have been at the highest rate since 1929.  And the salaries of senior executives continue to soar into the heavens.

 

For one thing, many of the biggest companies keep their profits abroad. Their U.S. taxes aren’t due unless and until the profits are repatriated to America. Then there are innumerable special tax breaks for assorted corporate activities and industries – the product of relentless lobbying. Finally, more and more enterprises have become “pass-through entities’’ – “S Corporations’’ with 100 or fewer shareholders. That lets them send their profits to shareholders without paying a corporate income tax.

 

 

But, as I’ve long suggested, rather than cut corporate taxes, why not get rid of them entirely, which would stop much of the corrupt lobbying by companies in Washington? Instead, raise the top marginal rates on those creatures who end up paying them directly or indirectly anyway – individual people. That would be much simpler and fairer, although it would reduce political contributions to Capitol Hill and devastate the lobbying industry in Washington.

 

Meanwhile, I got a chuckle out of U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s recent warning to congressional Republicans that Democrats will demand that any tax reform be bipartisan legislation. Some readers may recall that the final wording of the Affordable Care Act (which was partly a tax law) was almost entirely a Democratic creation, although much of the philosophy and structure behind it were originally Republican ideas, which became anathema to the GOP when the Democrats adopted them. A festival of hypocrisy.

 

xxx

 

A  story in the  Sept. 1-7 Providence Business  News discussed, among other rail-related things, the low ridership in and out of the newish Wickford MBTA station. This is to be expected when train service is too infrequent. To get people in Rhode Island to use the trains as much as they do in many Asian, European and some U.S. metro areas, service must be made much more frequent and reliable.

 

When I worked in Europe I was impressed by the density and frequency of train service, which made driving uncompetitive in time and money.

 

The article cited another problem that I’ve long noticed as someone who often takes trains to Boston: South Station, the rail (and bus) hub of New England, needs more track space and associated facilities if service to Rhode Island (and elsewhere) is to be substantially expanded. Indeed, we need more track in southern New England in general, for higher-speed long-distance Amtrak trains and commuter trains alike.

 

 

xxx

 

Block Island Police Chief Vincent Carlone doesn’t want the island’s weekly newspaper, the Block Island Times, to publish police logs identifying people arrested for such offenses as drunken driving because, he says, it’s unfair to shame them in this way. Or is it because he thinks that publishing such logs would be bad for business on the resort island, which is almost entirely dependent on tourists (many of whom are not averse to getting drunk) and rich summer residents? (B.I. has turned into something of an extension of the Hamptons in recent years.)

 

In a Sept. 4 story,  headlined “Chief lobbied paper not to run crime stories,’’ the chief told The Providence Journal:

 

“This is a nice community, and I’ve made that representation to them {a request that the paper not publish on paper or online police logs}.’’ And he said that the paper has “apparently agreed at some level.’’  Indeed, the paper has not published the arrest log for quite some time, although it had been a tradition for years.

 

Well, I think that people on such a small place as Block Island deserve to know what’s going on and to be able to decide for themselves what constitutes a serious offense. Drunk driving, for one, would seem to fall under that heading, since it can get people killed. John Pantalone, who’s chairman of the University of Rhode Island’s journalism program, told The Journal how he sees the problem:

 

“If the Police Department has chosen to withhold this information so as not to embarrass people in a small community, that seems like a bad policy.  Communities need to know about misbehavior both for their own protection and to discourage further, perhaps more serious, misbehavior.”

 

The biggest problem in publishing such police logs is that sometimes a charge doesn't hold up and/or an arrest is found invalid. News media are morally obligated to inform the public when that happens but they often don’t, or they publish the update so inconspicuously that virtually no one sees it. Very unfair!

 

In any event, these logs are public records. It’s up to the Block Island Times what to do with them.

 

Of course, most people love to read the dirt on local bad behavior. Most of us have a voyeuristic streak and a touch of schadenfreude – pleasure at seeing someone else’s misfortune. No matter how bad we think things are for us, someone near us has it worse. How comforting!

 

Not running police logs cuts readership. The Providence police reports once were among the most read things in The Providence Journal and the very droll “Crime and Punishment’’ section of The Boston Guardian (on whose board I sit) may be the most read part of that paper, Boston’s biggest weekly. (More exciting might be a story there about an apartment at 39 Beacon St. being rented for $50,000 a month – another sign of just how fancy downtown Boston has become because of money from financial services, health services, tech and flight capital flowing in from around the world. If only Providence could siphon off more of that moolah. So near and yet so far.)

 

It’s unclear if the police logs policy has anything to do with the paper’s sale last year to Michael Schroeder, who owns several Connecticut newspapers, and has links with casino mogul (and Trump pal) Sheldon Adelson.

 

 

Hit this link to read the Block Island story:

 

xxx

 

The big time for cruise ships along the New England shore is September and October, when, except for the rogue tropical cyclone, the weather tends to be the most reliably calm and sunny of the year hereabouts.

 

But this has led to some soul-searching in towns and small cities that are divided about the merits of these big ships disgorging hundreds of tourists for fast-paced tours of such “quaint’’ ports as Newport and Portland. It has become a very big issue in Bar Harbor, Maine, some of whose affluent seasonal residents don’t want these crowds and don’t want to see industrial-strength cruise ships marring their views from their big summer places. But others, especially the less affluent and year-round folks, want/need the money that the cruise-ship companies and their passengers (many of whom are very prosperous retired folks) bring into local economies that are heavily seasonal.

 

Trying to find a fair and stable balance between aesthetics and economics is an impossible task.

 

xxx

 

Kenya, of all places, has enacted the world’s strongest ban on those flimsy single-use plastic bags. While the law is mostly targeted at manufacturers and suppliers, police can go after individuals, although the government indicated that it would go easy on “the common man’’. And, The Washington Post reports, the penalties “could include four years in prison and up to {the equivalent of} $40,000 in fines.’’

 

Some other African nations have imposed full or partial bans on plastic bags, perhaps surprising given their poverty. However, they realize that their long-term prosperity depends in no small part on protecting their environment.

 

Probably for a long time to come, such a ban will only happen in a few localities in America. We usually value convenience above environmental protection. That’s too bad because the petrochemical-based bags cause tremendous plastic pollution, kill much wildlife that ingest them and clog sewers and other drains. There are toxic chemical compounds in these bags, and they take many, many years to decompose. These nasty if handy things ought to be phased out by a proposed federal law to be enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency, but don’t expect that from the Trump administration,  whose EPA is all too often anti-environment. (More mountaintop removal for coal!)

 

xxx

 

Not actual photo of Passy Pete
To maintain suspense, I try to put the most important items near the end.

 

So here we have a story from WLBZ-TV, in Bangor Maine, in which a group  of Mainers (or Mainiacs) reports that Passy Pete the Lobster “has predicted six more weeks of summer at an annual ceremony.’’

 

“The crustacean has been fished out of the Passagassawakeag River {which runs from  Waldo to Belfast, Maine} for the past three years in a tradition modeled after famed groundhog Punxsutawney Phil's winter prediction in Pennsylvania,’’ the station reported.

 

Passy Pete is watched as “he picks a scroll to determine whether Maine will see an extended summer or soon be greeted by winter.’’ Pete's been right the past two years. Or so they say. Anything for a photo op to draw some tourists.


The 50 Greatest Living Rhode Islanders

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.