Sides Battle Over Special Tax Break Extensions for Providence Properties

Kate Nagle, GoLocal News Editor

Sides Battle Over Special Tax Break Extensions for Providence Properties

Four existing Providence developments seeking tax break extensions were met with both support — and strong opposition -- on Tuesday night at a City Council Finance Committee hearing. 

Monohassett Mill, Pearl Street, Rising Sun Mills, and 100 Fountain Street went before the committee seeking five year extensions on their tax stabilization agreements (TSA) with the city, garnering testimony from tenants and unit owners who said the sudden tax hike after the current TSAs ended would be insurmountable — as did residents of the city who questioned the rest of the taxpayers continuing to offset the cost of the tax breaks. 

“There are very few places that the tax structure that has been afforded to these buildings had been afforded,” said Brian Bishop on behalf of the Providence Apartment Association at the hearing.  “A ‘ramp [up]’ would be nice for all of us, for everyone whose [property] values go up in the next valuation.”

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Council President Luis Aponte, who is not on the finance committee, said he saw the extensions as potentially necessary moving forward. 

“These are some of the early TSAs that were done under a different time when we knew less,” said Aponte.  “They're different projects, several of them are condos, so the extension would be for five years to full tax."

“Back then, there were ‘cliffs,’ continued Aponte, noting that the TSA structure required the developments to go suddenly from partially subsidized to fully-taxed. “There's pretty significant sticker shock to get them up full tax.”

Tax Breaks Under Inspection

The look at the extension for the four developments comes after the city and state agreed to a TSA structure for the 195 land back in July.  In March, the City Council had announced it was considering a major overhaul of tax breaks.

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza’s Chief Operating Officer Brett Smiley provide testimony on Tuesday at the hearing that the Administration was in support of the extensions. 

“On behalf of the administration, the Mayor supports all four of them. We’re pleased to work with the council so that this ‘cliff’ won’t be created again in the future. It creates an unfair burden on homeowners,” said Smiley. “We do think it’s the most responsible action possible.  We think all four are good agreements.”

Lawyer Nick Hemond, who represented Monohassett Mills, Pearl Street LLC, and Rising Sun Mills on Tuesday evening, called the situation of the TSA expiration for thos properties a “mini foreclosure crisis.”

Speaking first for Monohassett Mills, Hemond said, “The five year extension is the same form the Westminster properties receive last summer.  These people would lose their homes due to jump in taxes.  It’s a mini mortgage foreclosure crisis. [The extension] gives them time.  This is a phase in.  This old [TSA] model was effective in getting the development it wasn’t effective for sustainability.”

Opponents, however, questioned the application — and extension — of tax breaks in light of the city’s current economic climate.

“The TSA regime that we have is amounting to a theft from a public treasury — it is unevenly applied to developers that seem [blame] poor planning,” said Mike Araujo with Jobs for Justice, who spoke to the types of construction jobs he’s seen on TSA sites.  “TSAs take money out of school districts. Does the municipality even require adherence?  No. It’s opaque and arbitrarily applied.”

Long time Providence TSA critic John Jacobson was unable to make Tuesday’s hearing, but did submit testimony regarding the extension proposals. 

"There is absolutely no reason to grant these TSA extensions from the 2001 era of TSAs that can be rationally justified," said Jacobson. "It is in effect a massive subsidy to profit businesses that have long since finished their development. They also received a five year extension back in 2010 at the Statehouse and should have used the last five years preparing [for] this moment."

"Virtually any property owner in Providence could say that the economic crash of 2008 negatively effected them and that a tax abatement and freeze could help them financially avoid hardship and foreclosure," quipped Jacobson. 

City Council President Aponte said however that the proposals were fiscally neutral. 

"We're not losing any tax revenue -- just creating a softer landing to get up to full taxation," said Aponte.


The Highest Taxed Communities for 2015

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.