David Fisher: RI General Assembly Legislative Grants Lack Accountability, Transparency

Guest MINDSETTER™ David Fisher

David Fisher: RI General Assembly Legislative Grants Lack Accountability, Transparency

Earlier this week, our esteemed elected officials on Smith Hill announced the disbursement of the 2015 Legislative Grants. For those of you who don’t know, these grants are an annual feeding frenzy of organizations — some deserving, some not so deserving — sucking up taxpayer dollars in amounts of a few hundred to tens of thousands of dollars. I won’t go into the deservedness of individual grantees here. Suffice to say, there is enough pork in these grants that Chris Christie would have them in gestation crates. All told, the RI General Assembly doled out nearly $2.2 million in grants for fiscal year 2015.

While I personally find these grants an egregious attempt to buy votes with taxpayer money — which I wrote about this week on The Coalition Radio blog — I would find them slightly less contemptible if there was some transparency as to how these taxpayer dollars were granted; and some accountability as to how they were spent by the grantees. As they stand, the General Assembly’s grant process as to who gets cash, and who does not, is nebulous at best, and there is exactly zero accountability expected of grantees after the money is awarded. Here, I’ll offer some alternatives that would be certainly a fairer way to award those grants.

Scenario 1:

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Each Rhode Island Senator and Representative serves roughly the same population. I suggest that the grant monies be divided equally among the two houses, and then subdivided equally between the elected in each house. That would mean that the $2.2 million for FY 2015 would be split into $1.1 milion per house, and then split equally between the 75 Representatives, or roughly $14,700 per Representative, and the 38 Senators, or just under $29,000 per Senator. This would accomplish two things. 

First, the monies would be equally and fairly distributed to the people of Rhode Island. As reported earlier this week on GoLocalProv, as the grants stand, certain districts get FAR more of these dollars per capita. I’ll leave you to ponder which districts make out better or worse.

Second, the Reps and Senators would be SOLELY responsible for doling out the cash, without the aid and comfort of the “Well, I requested your grant, but it wasn’t approved by the assembly” dodge.

Scenario 2:

The monies would still be divided equally amongst Senators and Representatives, but their District committees would be in charge of a COMPETITIVE grant application process. This, I believe, would be marginally more fair because it would eliminate the funding of ‘pet projects’ and organizations to which the Reps and Senators belong or favor. Plus, it would give some purpose to the district committees in off-election years, during which most of them sit idle.

It would only take two things to reinvent the legislative grant process: political will and principle. Sadly, these things seem in short supply on Smith Hill, and they also seem to dwindle by the day.

In closing, I’ll say this: The unabashed acceptance of this murky slush fund by Rhode Island Democrats was enough for me to disaffiliate from the party this week, which I live tweeted from @DAFisherRI. For a group of people that crow for transparency and accountability, the wholesale acceptance of the legislative grant process is hypocritical and disgusting. The Rhode Island Democrats are no longer the “lesser of two evils” in my mind.

Dave Fisher is a freelance journalist, was a 2013 Green Party/Independent candidate for mayor in the City of Woonsocket, and co-hosts The Coalition, airing Saturday evenings at 6 p.m. on AM630 &99.7 FM – WPRO.

The 10 Most Politically Powerful at RI State House

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.