Donald TrumpOn February 1, 2017, GoLocalProv published my MINDSETTER™ piece, “The Banality of Trump.” At that time, I warned that Trump’s outrages would become our new normal. I regret that I was prescient in my analysis.
It is easy to ignore the antics of this carnival barker President, but that would be dangerous. This is a president who attacks the independent media, calling the media a “public enemy.” The proud labeler of the term “Fake News” has himself, by most counts, told over 3200 lies since he took office.
These lies are not only limited to comments about domestic political opponents but extend to our once and hopefully future allies. One recent and comparatively minor example was after the recent NATO meetings he claimed that he got other NATO members to increase their contributions to 4% of the GDP. French President Macron immediately debunked that statement as what could only be described as “Fake News.”
As he “prepared” for a visit with British Prime Minister May, in an interview with a British tabloid, Trump undercut May’s already tenuous political position saying that she ignored his advice to sue the European Union (for what?) and opined that her political rival, Boris Johnson, would make a great Prime Minister. At a subsequent press conference, Trump stated that the tabloid omitted the wonderful things he said about May. He further commented on the nature of “Fake News,” stated that his own press secretary had a tape of the interview and would share it with the media (as of this writing it has not been shared) and then attacked CNN.
Trump's Assault on America
Trump’s assault on the overall veracity of the media is nothing less than an assault on truth and facts. Who can ignore Kellyanne Conway’s star turn defending “alternative facts?” This is nothing less than the political equivalent to Lewis Carroll’s journey through the Looking Glass. Too many of our fellow citizens are eager to take the trip through that Looking Glass, ready to believe that out is in and down is up. “Facts” now are in the eye of the beholder and no longer objective and generally agreed upon information.
This is an acute danger to the survival of our democracy. A vibrant democracy depends on vigorous forensic discussions over “facts” to arrive at a consensus agreement on any issue moving forward. If we are now left to debate the existence of facts, then a democracy has nothing with which to form a consensus vital to its survival.
But more egregious is Trump’s assault on the rule of law. Since his inauguration, Trump has waged war on the courts, the law enforcement community, the concept of due process under law, and in particular the investigation into possible foreign interference with the 2016 election.
Since his inauguration, Trump has discharged one Assistant Attorney General, the Director and the Assistant Director of the FBI. Further, he has threatened the current Attorney General along with the Assistant Attorney General with loss of their positions.
He has belittled the investigation into the possible interference with the 2016 election, calling it a “witch hunt,” and has ignored the findings of his own intelligence community as to the 2016 interference and the likelihood of interference in the 2018 elections.
On July 16, 2018, he once again showed his true colors. Standing next to Vladimir Putin, just three days after a grand jury of Americans handed down an indictment against 12 Russian intelligence operatives, some high ranking in the Russian government, President Donald J. Trump disregarded the findings of his own government and those of an American grand jury and, citing the “strong” denials of Putin, sided with the Russians.
Trump ignored his sworn oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. His joint press conference gave a preview of how he will justify this blatant capitulation of his presidential duty. When asked about the indictments by an AP reporter, he launched into an assault on Hillary Clinton, her emails, and the DNC servers. We can expect this deflection tactic to expand and become more virulent over the coming days as he resorts to the only tools he knows how to use: the exploitation of the divisions in our own society, and the hatreds and biases of his hoodwinked supporters.
Will Hope Prevail?
Earlier this year, historian Jon Meacham’s book The Soul of America was published, a paean to the American spirit. His thesis is that American history has seen battles between hope and fear, and in each battle, hope – the spirit of progress in our liberal democracy – has prevailed. Acknowledging that we are now in a fearful time, he is certain that hope will ultimately prevail because, if for no other reason, it always has.
Meacham writes about the efforts of presidents such as Lincoln, Wilson, the two Roosevelts to restore hope. Implicit in his thesis is that, no matter how bad presidential leadership is at a given time, successor presidents will reject the fear and attendant hate and restore our values of hope, so intrinsic in our national soul.
That said, there are a few points that must be made. First, we have never seen a president such as Trump. Even those poorly regarded by history are eminently superior to the current occupant of the Oval Office. No president has sowed divisions, fueled hatreds, and attempted to dismantle the organs of government and the rule of law as has our current president. And no president – none – has ever sided with a foreign adversary to the detriment of the American people.
Related to the first is the second point, our post-fact world. As noted above, we no longer discuss or argue over the meaning of facts, we question their very existence. And this has been exploited by those partisans who care only for their political success at the expense of our democratic processes.
Third, as Meacham notes, much of our progress born of hope has been driven from the people, and not elected leaders. We have the power to make common cause with our fellow citizens, even those with whom we disagree, to restore traditional democratic values and reject the messages of hate and division propounded by those who seek to advance their own narrow interests at the expense of the public interests.
Geoffrey A. Schoos, Esq is the past President of the former Rhode Island Center for Law and Public Policy.
GoLocal Statewide Poll - Conducted by Harvard's Della Volpe - June, 2018
Q4: When it comes to voting, do you consider yourself to be affiliated with the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, Moderate, or Unaffiliated with a major party?
Q5: Next year, in November of 2018, there will be a statewide general election for Governor and many other state offices. How likely is it that you will vote in this election? Will you definitely be voting, will you probably be voting, are you 50-50...
Definitely be voting.............................. 81%
Probably be voting............................... 19%
All others............................................. 0%
Top Issue
Q6: What would you say is the number one problem facing Rhode Island that you would like the Governor to address?
Q9: Over the last three years or so, has your family's financial situation improved, gotten worse, or not changed at all?
Changed for the better......................... 24%
Changed for the worse......................... 33%
Not changed at all................................ 43%
Governor
Q10: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Gina Raimondo, a Democrat
I am sure to vote for her: 9%
There is a good chance I will vote for her: 19%
It is possible that I vote for her: 24%
It is unlikely that I will vote for her: 18%
I will never vote for her: 31%
Governor
Q11: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Matt Brown, a Democrat
I am sure to vote for him: 4%
There is a good chance I will vote for him: 8%
It is possible that I vote for him: 40%
It is unlikely that I will vote for him: 30%
I will never vote for him: 17%
Governor
Q12: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Spencer Dickinson, a Democrat
I am sure to vote for him: 3%
There is a good chance I will vote for him: 7%
It is possible that I vote for him: 37%
It is unlikely that I will vote for him: 35%
I will never vote for him: 18%
Governor
Q13: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Paul Roselli, a Democrat
I am sure to vote for him: 2%
There is a good chance I will vote for him: 7%
It is possible that I vote for him: 35%
It is unlikely that I will vote for him: 37%
I will never vote for him: 19%
Governor
Q14: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Allan Fung, a Republican
I am sure to vote for him: 7%
There is a good chance I will vote for him: 18%
It is possible that I vote for him: 28%
It is unlikely that I will vote for him: 25%
I will never vote for him: 21%
Governor
Q15: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Patricia Morgan, a Republican
I am sure to vote for her: 3%
There is a good chance I will vote for her.: 9%
It is possible that I vote for her: 32%
It is unlikely that I will vote for her: 35%
I will never vote for her: 21%
Governor
Q16: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Giovanni Feroce, a Republican
I am sure to vote for him: 2%
There is a good chance I will vote for him: 5%
It is possible that I vote for him: 24%
It is unlikely that I will vote for him: 35%
I will never vote for him: 34%
Governor
Q17: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Luis-Daniel Muñoz, an Independent
I am sure to vote for him: 3%
There is a good chance I will vote for him: 6%
It is possible that I vote for him: 33%
It is unlikely that I will vote for him: 38%
I will never vote for him: 21%
Governor
Q18: Which of the following comes closest to your view regarding each of the following potential candidates for governor of Rhode Island?
Joe Trillo, an Independent
I am sure to vote for him: 1%
There is a good chance I will vote for him: 8%
It is possible that I vote for him: 37%
It is unlikely that I will vote for him: 34%
I will never vote for him: 19%
Governor
Q20: If the election for Governor were held today and the candidates were: Democrat Gina Raimondo, Republican Allan Fung and Independent Joe Trillo - for whom would you vote?
Allan Fung, a Republican..................... 33%
Gina Raimondo, a Democrat................ 33%
Joe Trillo, and Independent.................. 16%
Don't know 18%
Governor
Q20: If the election for Governor were held today and the candidates were: Democrat Gina Raimondo, Republican Patricia Morgan and Independent Joe Trillo - for whom would you vote?
Q21: If the election for Governor were held today and the candidates were: Democrat Matt Brown, Republican Allan Fung and Independent Joe Trillo - for whom would you vote?
Allan Fung, a Republican..................... 35%
Matt Brown, a Democrat...................... 25%
Joe Trillo, an Independent.................... 14%
Q22: If the election for Governor were held today and the candidates were: Democrat Matt Brown, Republican Patricia Morgan and Independent Joe Trillo - for whom would you vote?
Matt Brown, a Democrat...................... 30%
Patricia Morgan, a Republican............. 20%
Joe Trillo, an Independent.................... 18%
Q23: If the election for the U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were: [ROTATE] Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse and Republican Robert Nardolillo - for whom would you vote?
Q24: If the election for the U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were: [ROTATE] Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse and Republican Robert Flanders - for whom would you vote?
Q25: If there was an election today, would you vote to approve or reject issuing $250 million in financing supported general obligation bonds to repair Rhode Island's deteriorating school buildings and bring them up to minimum standards called "warm, safe and dry"?
Q26: The Rhode Island General Assembly is in the process of negotiating a $40 million public financing deal with the Pawtucket Red Sox for a new stadium, hoping to bring a vote before the House and Senate this summer.
In general, do you favor or oppose the use of public funds to help finance a new stadium for the Pawtucket Red Sox?
Q27: The City of Providence and the state of Rhode Island are considering a proposal by New York developer Jason Fane to build a 46-story luxury residence tower in Providence, next to a public riverfront park. The developer will invest $250 to $300 million of his own funds. The project is called the Hope Point Tower, it would be 170-feet taller than the Superman building and would require waiving height restrictions and the use of state tax credits.
In general, do you favor or oppose development of the Hope Point Tower?
Q29: Since it was launched in 2016, UHIP -- the Rhode Island program designed to improve customer service for those who receive federal benefits -- has run into significant problems, including long lines, cost overruns, lost applications, over- and under-charging of patients and families.
Based on what you know at this time, what percent of blame for this do you assign to:
Deloitte, the consulting company who
produced the system........................... 53.3%
Governor Gina Raimondo, who has
been governor since the system
launch in September 2016................... 47.1%
NIMBYism
Q30: Presently, there are local groups opposing the development of a natural gas facility in Burrillville, solar projects in Exeter, a LNG facility in Providence and wind projects in North Kingstown.
Some people say that it is important for local groups to play a role in opposition of projects like these that could be dangerous or harmful to citizens;
Others say that local groups have gone too far to the detriment of the state’s long-term energy needs.
Which statement comes closer to your own view?
Local groups play an important role...... 46%
Local groups have gone too far............. 31%
Not sure................................................. 24%
Corruption
Q31: Compared to other states, do you think there is:
More political corruption in RI................. 63%
Less political corruption in RI................ 7%
About the same level as other states..... 30%
Income
Q32: The next question is about the total income of YOUR HOUSEHOLD for the PAST 12 MONTHS. Please include your income PLUS the income of all members living in your household (including cohabiting partners and armed forces members living at home).
$50,000 or less.................................... 33%
More $50,000 but less than $75,000..... 18%
More $75,000 but less than $100,000... 16%
More $100,000 but less than $150,000. 13%
$150,000 or more................................ 10%
Q33: What particular ethnic group or nationality - such as English, French, Italian, Irish, Latino, Jewish, African American, and so forth - do you consider yourself a part of or feel closest to?