Smart Benefits: New Disability Claims Procedure In Effect Today
Rob Calise, GoLocalProv Business/Health Expert
Smart Benefits: New Disability Claims Procedure In Effect Today

All ERISA-governed plans are required by Section 503 of ERISA to have claims procedures that provide for a full and fair review of claims. Regulations issued under Section 503 contain detailed direction as to the claims process, including timeframes, notice requirements, notice content, and qualifications for claims reviewers. In 2010, under the Affordable Care Act, claims procedures for group health plans were enhanced significantly, while procedures for disability plans were unchanged. The new rules attempt to align the rules governing disability claims with the requirements applicable to group health plans.
The revised rules now include the following new protections for claimants:
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST- Disclosure of the basis for disagreeing with a third party. Adverse benefit determinations have to contain a discussion of the decision, including the basis for disagreeing with any disability determination by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) or the views of any treating physician or vocational professional who evaluated the claimant.
- Right to review and respond with new information before final decision. Prior to a decision on appeal, a plan will be required to provide the claimant, free of charge, any new or additional evidence considered, relied upon, or generated by (or at the direction of) the plan in connection with the claim, as well as any new or additional rationale for a denial. The claimant must then be given a reasonable opportunity to respond to such new or additional evidence or rationale.
- Strict compliance and possible unfavorable standard of review by a court. If a plan fails to strictly adhere to all ERISA procedural requirements when processing a disability claim (except for certain minor errors), this failure may now trigger the claimant’s right to file a lawsuit in court under Section 502(a) of ERISA, even before the plan’s procedures are exhausted. In that case, a court may not give special deference to the plan’s decision, instead using a de novo standard of review that is generally less favorable to the employer.

