Closed Baker Says Robbins is “Morally Bankrupt” and Opposes Raimondo Giving Him $3.6M
GoLocalProv News Team and Kate Nagle
Closed Baker Says Robbins is “Morally Bankrupt” and Opposes Raimondo Giving Him $3.6M
Robbins and his company Urban Smart Growth (USG) was recently awarded $3.6 million in tax credits by Governor Gina Raimondo and the RI Commerce Corporation -- after Robbins had come under scrutiny in California due to reported slumlord accusations, and has been the subject of lawsuits in North Carolina and Connecticut. Now, former tenants of Hope Artiste Village are coming forward with their stories.
Deana Martin, who had owned the Bread Lab with her husband, said that she battled with Robbins over a number of issues -- including the insurance money following the destruction of her bakery equipment due to the mill’s sprinklers going off one night.
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST“If you don't give him what he wants, he'll use whatever leverage he has to get what wants,” said Martin. “If it furthers his benefit, he'll take it from you, and the legal proceedings are just that — if he wins, he claims he’s not ‘guilty.’
“From the perspective of Rhode Island, if all Rhode Island wants to do is bring jobs, then they don’t care about the rest of this. All they care about is jobs,” said Martin of the tax credits awarded to Robbins and USG. “It’s like Curt Schilling and 38 Studios -- there's a name, there's 'success', but they don't look deep enough. In the end it will harm residents.”
Martin’s Story
“My experience with Lance at the outset was positive. My husband and I operated a catering business in a wholesale bakery, and moved to Providence to get into retail,” said Martin. “So a friend told me about Hope Artiste Village. We knew the space probably wouldn’t support a fine dining establishment, but with the bakery, the catering and retail, and the restaurant, Bread Lab, we thought it work with having all those operations in there together.”
“It was early 2014,” said Martin. “When we opened it went well at first, we had a solid lunch business, and with the bakery and catering we had a good base of revenue. The plan was to help open something on the second floor -- that was going to be an urban event space, I’m not sure whatever happened with that. Then they opened the bowling alley, and Nosh opened.”
“When we were three weeks late with rent that January, [Robbins] served us with a notice, which I figured was a legal formality,” said Martin. “When I paid the rent, they didn't cash the check, they went forward with the legal proceedings — they said it was their right not to cash the check. But they said we still had serve [food] on the third floor in the meantime, so we said no -- so we went to court and lost. As far as the court was concerned, we had no right to cure.”
Robbins has not responded to repeated requests for comment.
Sprinkler Destruction, Insurance Battle
“Around the time that we first appealed [the court decision], we came in one morning to find the space flooded — the sprinklers had gone off,” said Martin. “I don’t know exactly what happened, but the oven and the bakery were destroyed.”
“This is after [USG] had offered to buy my business out for $40,000. Meanwhile, I’d spent over $300,000 building out the space,” said Martin. “I’d rejected that offer. They had tried to tell me they had a landlord lien in the equipment, which was my equipment that I’d moved in there.”
“[USG] came after my insurance money after the flooding, which they knew was the only thing I had to live on at that point,” said Martin, who said that the insurance money was roughly $100,000. “Their lawyer did everything he could to drag it out. It cost me $15,000 just to deal with the legal hassle of USG on the insurance. [Robbins] inflated the costs on what I owed him on the way out. This was a business I had built for 20 years.”
“The lion’s share of people he harms are women — me, Rosinha, Phyllis,” said Martin, of Rosinha Benros, who had owned and was closed Rosinha’s in the same location, and Phyllis Arffa, who had owned and closed Blaze in the same space.
“Phyllis got hurt in ways I can’t even imagine, she didn’t have the same protections I’d put in place,” said Martin. “It’s devastating.”
Lance Robbins Controversies Through the Years
TENANTS WHO BATTLE ARMIES OF RATS SUE LANDLORD
LINDA DEUTSCH, Associated Press
Jun. 5, 1986
Residents of a dilapidated building who say they regularly fight off armies of giant rats, swarms of cockroaches and youth gangs that roam their hallways have sued the building's owner for $10 million.
Attorneys for the Spanish-speaking residents related nightmarish stories of cockroaches biting sleeping children, a rat they said tried to drag a baby from its bed and another that allegedly attacked a man in the shower.
They said tenants feel rats crawl over them at night and some stand guard over babies all night, fighting off the rodents with brooms and slingshots.
The lawyers opened roach traps on the front steps of the South Union Street building near downtown to display dozens of huge cockroaches, some still crawling, which they said were caught in the building overnight.
The lawsuit, filed jointly in Superior Court by four private and public- interest law firms, accuses building owner Lance J. Robbins and his associates of refusing to make repairs, curb vermin infestation or provide reliable water, electricity or security in the 40-unit building, which houses large families in one-room apartments.
Robbins said Wednesday that none of his employees in the building have seen any rats and, ''I wouldn't be a bit surprised if a lot of this at the news conference was staged.''
Los Angeles Times, August 8, 1986, "Landlord Issues 5 More Violations"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 1 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 2 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 3 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 4 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, March 26, 2002, "Slumlords Donated to Delgadillo"
Los Angeles Times, Oct 25, 2005
Los Angeles Times, Nov. 1, 2005, "State Moves to Pull Real Estate Liense of L.A. Landlord"
Robbins Loses Real Estate License
Realty Times, January 18, 2010
Real estate broker and attorney, Lance Robbins, both owned and managed numerous "slumlord" apartments in the city of Los Angeles. This, as acknowledged by Robbins's attorney, was an extremely lucrative business. The record suggests, though, that Robbins took less than adequate care of the apartments under his control. Between 1985 and 1995, Robbins had been convicted of some 50 municipal building code violations. He was twice disciplined (1991 and 1994) by the State Bar for "facts and circumstances surrounding habitability violations in properties" that he owned.
In January of 2001, Robbins pleaded nolo contendere and was convicted of three misdemeanor violations of the fire protection and prevention provisions of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. He was fined $100 and placed on summary probation for 18 months. In March of 2003 the Department of Real Estate filed an accusation alleging that Robbins's convictions constituted cause for the suspension or revocation of his license as a broker.
http://realtytimes.com/todaysheadlines1/item/2962-20100119_licenseREAD MORE HERE
Lauren Saunders of the National Consumer Law Center is one of the top tenant advocacy attorneys told GoLocal on Tuesday.
Robbins was one of the most dishonest and unscrupulous people I have come across in my career working for vulnerable tenants and consumers. I cannot imagine entrusting any city money to him.
Lance Robbins was the worst slumlord in L.A. history. The city's Slum Housing Task Force prosecuted him numerous times for horrible conditions at his buildings. He also ran up huge water bills at his buildings that he refused to pay, and the city was reluctant to shut off the water for fear of harming the tenants. I filed a False Claims Act case against him and he was forced to pay $1 million in back water bills.
He was also extremely ingenious about using a complex web of sham corporations to avoid liability. After the fines from his slum violations and his back water bills started adding up, he started foreclosing against himself and putting his buildings into receivership to escape accountability. His buildings were in numerous different corporations and partnerships and he put loans in other names against his own buildings, then started a foreclosure action. He then asked the court to appoint a "neutral" receiver who he chose who actually just let Robbins stay in control of the building. We detailed that in the same lawsuit.
Developer Getting $3.6M in RI Tax Credits Sued by N. Carolina Town for Backing Out of Project
Urban Smart Growth (USG), the developer who just received nearly $3.6 million in tax credits from Governor Gina Raimondo and the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation, was sued by the Town of Belville, North Carolina, in 2015 for backing out of a project, GoLocal has learned...
Robbins and USG stated on Monday that they are intending to utilize the Rhode Island tax credits to complete a $38.9 million project to develop 150 loft apartments at Hope Artiste Village in Pawtucket.
However, in North Carolina, a stalled USG project has led to the Town of Belville to seek arbitration, following its 2015 lawsuit against USG, who in 2007 had entered into a twenty-year agreement to develop a mixed-used project along the town's waterfront.
Not only did the project never come to fruition, press reports show that USG engaged in discussions with the adjacent town of Leland to annex Belville's downtown and undertake the project with them instead.
"We need to bring [Robbins] to light. It's really a shame-- he goes and buys up cheap property and tries and hoodwinks the local city councils to fund this kind of development," said Peter Schardien, who is the husband of Belville Commissioner Donna Schardien, of Robbins. "He's an attorney, or he used to be, and he knows how to get around things. He's no good."
Former Business Partner of Robbins of USG Sued and Received $28M - and Warns RI
Frank Gamwell, a former business partner of Lance Robbins of Urban Smart Growth (USG), has said that he would "never do business with him again" after suing Robbins for $28 million and ultimately receiving the amount in arbitration.
Now, Gamwell is warning that Rhode Island should be doing its "due diligence" in dealing with Robbins.
On Monday, USG was awarded $3.6 million in tax credits from Governor Gina Raimondo and the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation to develop lofts at Hope Artiste Village.
"This Just Isn't Fair,” Says Restaurant Owner About Developer Robbins Getting $3.6M in RI Tax Credits
A former restaurant owner at Hope Artiste Village said that she "wished she had sued" Urban Smart Growth (USG), the management company that was awarded $3.6 million in tax credits from the RI Commerce Corporation this week.
Rosinha Benros, who had opened and owned the restaurant "Rosinha" at Hope Artiste Village, said she had a number of issues with USG -- including having had gas being turned off due to USG not having paid their National Grid bill.
"I opened that space, I created that place," Benros told GoLocal on Thursday, of the restaurant she ran for over three years. "I can't even drive by, I loved that place so much. It just breaks my heart."
Benros said that issues with the change in management, coupled with having problems with The Met being located next door, led in part to her closing the restaurant.
USG's CEO and principal is controversial developer Lance Robbins, who in California was cited with 105 health and building-code violations, piled up 32 convictions, paid a $1 million fine, to name a few of his legal problems, according to press reports.
RI Security Firm Says Developer Robbins of USG Won’t Pay $23K Bill
A former security services vendor for Hope Artiste Village is claiming that owner Urban Smart Growth (USG) never paid them $23,583 for services in a six-month span starting in 2013.
“We started services on December 13, 2013 and ended services on June 21, 2014. They paid a total of six invoices during our services,” said Karen Voisard with Metropolitan Public Safety, who provided the check stubs from USG. “As of current standing with the company we are owed $23,583.00 for eighteen overdue invoices. That doesn't include any of the late charges as stated in our contract.”
Former Owner of Blaze Restaurant: USG’s Robbins “Threatened to Bankrupt Me”
Phyllis Arffa, the originator and owner of the restaurant Blaze, said that Lance Robbins of Urban Smart Growth threatened to bankrupt her when her business was struggling at Hope Artiste Village.
Arffa, who owned and operated Blaze on Hope Street in Providence before moving to Hope Artist Village in 2015, said that she has had to go back to working in a kitchen to pay back $70,000 in debt that she accrued while trying to make Blaze work under Robbins, which she said she ultimately had to step away from due to financial and health reasons.
"I wish I never met [Robbins]. I had money in the bank, we were all set to relax for a little while," said Arffa after moving from Hope Street to the Hope Artiste village. "Now, I'm working 12 to 12 to just to pay back what I owe."
Arffa showed a text sent by Robbins threatening to bankrupt her.
Robbins Crushed Local Baker
The former owner of the Bread Lab at Hope Artiste Village, which is owned by controversial developer Lance Robbins, said she found him to be “morally bankrupt” as she was forced to close her operations in 2015.
Deana Martin, who had owned the Bread Lab with her husband, said that she battled with Robbins over a number of issues -- including the insurance money following the destruction of her bakery equipment due to the mill’s sprinklers going off one night.
“If you don't give him what he wants, he'll use whatever leverage he has to get what wants,” said Martin. “If it furthers his benefit, he'll take it from you, and the legal proceedings are just that — if he wins, he claims he’s not ‘guilty.’
