Is The Boston Globe’s Kevin Cullen Part of ‘Fake News’?

James Freeman, Columnist

Is The Boston Globe’s Kevin Cullen Part of ‘Fake News’?

Kevin Cullen, Boston Globe
The incendiary allegations raised last week on the WEEI radio show “Kirk & Callahan” against Boston Globe columnist Kevin Cullen were validated when the paper announced late Friday afternoon that it was placing him on “paid administrative leave,” pending a thorough examination of his work. This raises two troubling questions: Will there be concerns surrounding the validity of The Globe’s 2014 Pulitzer Prize and, perhaps worse, is Cullen the newest member of “Fake News?”

Cullen, a journalist with The Globe since 1985, and part of its Pulitzer Prize-winning teams of 2003 and 2014, is accused of embellishing and fabricating certain Boston Marathon bombing stories in the wake of the April 15, 2013 carnage.

Of particular concern is Cullen’s first column after the bombing (“A perfect Marathon day, then the unimaginable”) and a subsequent interview he gave with the BBC. As the radio duo -- Kirk Minihane and Gerry Callahan -- charges, his writing, and statements seem to show important inconsistencies. The column is ambiguous. It strongly implies he was at the finish line. However, during the interview, he said he was “a mile away” from the finish line when the bombs exploded.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Furthermore, Minihane said Cullen later admitted that he did not arrive at that location until hours later. A blog post on weei.com says that “Cullen also appears [in the BBC interview] to make up details regarding Jane Richard.” She was badly injured during the bombing and is the mother of Martin Richard, one of three killed on Boylston Street that day.

Perhaps contributing to the fury, in a retrospective column (“Five years later, we feel the grief like a sixth sense”), Cullen wrote, “I can smell Patriots Day, 2013.” He also recalls the sound, the sight, the feel and the taste of that gruesome day. And, for good measure, what he calls the sixth sense. Grief.

Cullen is now causing a lot of grief at The Globe.

All the commotion is the latest incident in what has been described as a “toxic relationship” between the paper and the radio station. But the paper must determine if fuzzy facts are all merely understandable, hence pardonable, slips of a memory still foggy from haze of the ensuing events or if they were deliberate attempts to mislead and lie.

Boston Marathon bombing
The accusations against Cullen appear to be the first time the integrity of his work is being called into question. Still, given the seriousness of the charges, and The Globe’s actions, it is highly likely that the investigation will dig deep into his past. And that will take time. And that may reveal more shame for the paper.

Notably, this isn’t the first time a Globe columnist has had to address questions about embellishing stories with potentially embarrassing outcomes. Nearly 20 years ago, Mike Barnicle and Patricia Smith resigned from the paper in disgrace. Both were caught fabricating characters and events in their columns. Barnicle, still unrepentant, has been a long-time contributor at MSNBC (under the innocuous title “veteran columnist”) and Smith (who acknowledged her misdeeds) is now a nationally acclaimed poet. But she shares something in common with Cullen. The Pulitzer Prize.

In 1998, Smith was a Pulitzer Prize finalist in Commentary for “her lyrical and evocative columns on an assortment of urban topics,” according to pulitzer.org. A citation of which no one remembers.

In 2014, likewise, Cullen was a Pulitzer finalist in Commentary. That achievement was recognized (his editor, Brian McGrory was a jury member) for Cullen’s “street-wise local columns that capture the spirit of a city, especially after its famed Marathon was devastated by terrorist bombings.” An event of which no one will forget. And will subject Cullen to more intense public scrutiny and criticism than Smith.

(Interestingly, Cullen’s nominated work in this category did not include his first column after the bombings. The one that has sparked the outrage.)       

As mentioned, Cullen was a member of The Globe’s Spotlight investigative team that actually won the 2003 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for exposing the cover-up of the sexual abuse scandal by Roman Catholic priests (his published contribution). He was also a member of the team that won the 2014 Pulitzer for Breaking News Reporting. The pending review of Cullen’s writings ought to go back to at least 2002, maybe earlier. Should it be found that his work associated with these teams was corrupt, it would surely taint those coveted Pulitzer Prizes, too.

And with a now-evident sense of irony -- a seventh sense? -- in 2016 Cullen was awarded best general column writing by the Society of Professional Journalists. It boasts a Code of Ethics imploring journalists to “seek truth and report it,” “minimize harm,” “act independently,” and, “be accountable and transparent.”

Today, Cullen’s columnist profile still contains this curious line: “I thought Harvard had standards until they gave me a Nieman Fellowship.” They might nonetheless. But whatever happens to Cullen, careless or calculating, he will undoubtedly be associated with “Fake News.” An award that just smells.          

  

James P. Freeman is a New England-based writer. He is a columnist with The New Boston Post and former columnist with The Cape Cod Times. His work has also appeared in The Providence Journal, The Cape Codder, newenglanddiary.com, insidesources.com, and nationalreview.com.


17 Biggest Media Stories of 2017

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.