Proposed Renewable Energy Mandates Would Further Harm RI Economy, Guest MINDSETTER™ Stenhouse

Guest MINDSETTER™ Mike Stenhouse

Proposed Renewable Energy Mandates Would Further Harm RI Economy, Guest MINDSETTER™ Stenhouse

Representative Deborah Ruggiero
Rhode Island families and businesses already suffer from some of the highest energy prices in the nation. This Tuesday, our state’s full House will vote on a bill that would raise those costs even higher, even as the Trump administration rejected similar international energy mandates … as climate change took to the world stage this past week.

Our Center believes that every Rhode Island family should have access to affordable energy, which can improve our quality of life in so many ways. We also believe that neither our business sector nor our state economy should suffer negative consequences from artificially overpriced energy. House bill H5274A, sponsored by Representative Deborah Ruggiero, would increase renewable energy mandates even beyond the crippling levels already on the books.

With a degree in Economics from Harvard University, and after studying significant research on the topic, I am convinced that the real and immediate negative economic consequences of such legislation far outweigh any negligible, theoretical and future, environmental gains. I challenge proponents of this bill to put forth a credible cost-vs-benefits analysis. I’ll provide mine below.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

It is precisely because of bills like H5274A and other progressive-left legislation passed in recent decades that Rhode Island suffers from the worst-ranked business climate in the country and a 45th rank on the national Family Prosperity Index. Passage of this bill would worsen both of these already poor rankings.

Job-Killing, Economy-Busting Bill. This additional renewable energy mandate, like the proposed ‘carbon tax’ bill that is in the legislative wings, would drive up energy costs across RI and would negatively impact our potential for economic growth by reducing consumer purchasing power; by reducing or eliminating business profits (potentially driving some businesses out of state or out of business); and by costing jobs for many RI families.

Economic Analysis. Whether via green energy mandates, carbon taxes, or restrictions on more efficient fossil-fuel based energy production, higher energy costs are a major drag on economic growth. According to a 2016 report by the Center, Big Cost, Little Difference, an extreme green energy agenda, which this bill would advance, could result in dire economic consequences;

·         4,000 – 6,000 net fewer jobs

·         $141-$190 million in unnecessary production costs

·         a 49-73% increase in the base cost of electricity, leading to

·         a 13-18% increase in electricity rates

·         $670-$893 million extracted from the economy

 

Passage of this bill would make the numbers above even worse. Our state economy is simply too fragile to be able to handle yet another negative hit.

Cost-vs-Benefit Analysis? The ultimate question that should be asked of supporters of this legislation is: for what offsetting gain? What benefit do they project that this legislation will have on actual families and businesses in our state? Does anyone really think that the relatively miniscule reductions in carbon emissions that might result from this bill could, in any way, offset the massive economic losses documented above?

Net loss of jobs. Despite the few new green energy jobs proponents might claim, the larger negative impact of higher energy prices will cost the overall state economy tens, if not hundreds, times more job losses. Our Center has done the research - have they?

More low-cost energy is needed, not less. Because of innovation and the free-enterprise system, Rhode Island and our region are already producing low-cost, low-carbon emission natural-gas powered energy. Further, consumers should determine which energy products are in their own best interests, free from politically inspired government subsidies or penalties. This bill would increase the cost of energy and lessen the supply of low-cost energy to consumers.

To take an additional positive step for Rhode Island families and businesses, new energy producing projects like the proposed Burrillville natural-gas plant could produce the efficient and environmentally-friendly energy that can help increase the prosperity of all of us by actually lowering energy rates.

Mike Stenhouse is CEO for the RI Center for Freedom & Prosperity, the state’s leading free-market research and advocacy organization.

Rhode Island’s 50 Wealthiest and Most Influential - 2015 Edition

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.