Robert Whitcomb's Digital Diary: Greedy-Boomer Bathos and Last Chance Superman

Robert Whitcomb, Columnist

Robert Whitcomb's Digital Diary: Greedy-Boomer Bathos and Last Chance Superman

Robert Whitcomb
Blue ribbons for Blue States; Norse Code for Green; Greedy-Boomer Bathos; Cooler, Detail-Free Trump; Last Chance for Superman Bldg.?

 

"To be interested in the changing seasons is a happier state of mind than to be hopelessly in love with spring." 
 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

--  George Santayana

 

Yet again, after many decades of Sun Belt hype, we have another measure of how the generally northern and mostly Blue States are, by important metrics, the best states to live in. That’s largely because of their tradition of strong education and infrastructure. US News & World Report’s first ranking of the best states list in the top 10: Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Washington State, Iowa, Utah, Maryland, Colorado and Vermont. (Connecticut was 12th, Maine 18th and Rhode Island 21st.)

 

The publication said:

“Some states shine in health care. Some soar in education. Some excel in both – or in much more. The Best States ranking …draws on thousands of data points to measure how well states are performing for their citizens. In addition to health care and education, the metrics take into account a state’s economy, the opportunity it offers people, its roads, bridges, Internet and other infrastructure, its public safety and the integrity and health of state government.

 

“More weight was accorded to some state measures than others, based on a survey of what matters most to people. Health care and education were weighted most heavily. Then came the opportunity states offer their citizens, their crime & corrections and infrastructure. State economies followed closely in weighting, followed by measures of government administration. This explains why Massachusetts, ranking No. 1 in education and No. 2 in health care, occupies the overall No. 1 spot in the Best States rankings. And it explains why New Hampshire, ranking No. 1 in opportunity for its citizens, ranks No. 2 overall in the Best States rankings.’’

 

The low-tax (except for their regressive sales taxes) low-public-service Red States in the South generally did very poorly.

 

Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican and a very able executive who’s expected to run for re-election next year, said:         

 

“We have a lot of really smart people, we have a lot of great schools. That has led to a whole series of terrific what I would call ‘ecosystems’ around technology and health care and finance and education. And you put it all together, and in this day and age, in this kind of global economy and global world we live in, it’s a terrific mix.” Of course, Massachusetts has had some great institutions since the 17th Century; it had a running start.

 

Mr. Baker will probably get some credit for the ranking, but the essentials of the Bay State’s health have been in place for a long time.  Governors and U.S. presidents have remarkably little impact on the economic health of their jurisdictions;  there are far too many variables.

 

As for New Hampshire, it has the overwash of wealth from the very rich Greater Boston area, the Granite State’s good public education, political integrity, local  and state civic-mindedness, a tradition of  having many well-run small and medium-size companies and industrial craftsmanship. And as  befits a state that is mostly suburban, exurban and rural,  lower taxes than Massachusetts’s.

 

US News folks did note that Massachusetts, despite of, or because of, its very low unemployment rate, had too little “affordable housing’’ (whatever that means exactly) and very wide income inequality. But the latter is due largely to the vast wealth collected by the senior execs and shareholders of very successful enterprises founded in, based in or with major operations in the Bay State and the large number of well paid  physicians, engineers, financial-services honchos and other very highly skilled professionals.

 

xxx

 

Governor Gina Raimondo
Kudos to the Raimondo administration  and others involved in bringing Norwegian Airlines to T.F. Green Airport! The Federal Aviation Administration and others have long wanted Green to offer regular international flights, to, among other things, reduce congestion at Boston’s Logan International Airport. Certainly southeastern New England has the population density to support a major international airport.

 

The extension of the main runway to 8,700 feet due to be completed at year’s end should draw more international airlines since the longer runway means very long-haul airlines can use it.  Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut business should study how they can best benefit from Green’s expanded role in international travel.

 

xxx

 

Generations obviously flow into each other and we must be leery of over-generalizing. But Bruce Cannon Gibney is on to something when indicting the Baby Boom generation (1946-1964) for having all too many selfish, narcissistic, greedy uncivic-minded, myopic and, well, dishonest people. He makes his case in forthcoming book: A Generation of Sociopaths: How the Baby Boomers Betrayed America.

 

Consider the corruption in varying degrees of leading politicians and business leaders in the past 40 years as the Baby Boomers came to power. Look at their disinclination, compared to their parents, to participate in unpaid if admirable civic projects. You don’t hear very much anymore of “dollar-a-year men’’ who volunteer to take onerous but crucial public-sector jobs to address a crisis. Look at their using public office to line up gargantuan payoffs  later in the private sector.

 

You see many more rich Boomers plastering their names on buildings, be they at colleges, museums and hospitals, compared to their parents’ generation, for whom anonymous giving was much admired. From the Gospel of Matthew, in the New Testament: "Be careful not to do 'good works' in front of others. Don't do them to be seen by others. If you do, your Father in heaven will not reward you.’’

 

 

You see something of the Baby Boomer culture in executive suites, not to mention the Oval Office. As Boomers started to take big jobs in public companies many started to display astonishing greed compared to their parents, and a disinclination to share corporate wealth with their underlings, whose inflation-adjusted wages generally have fallen over the era of Boomer hegemony. At the same time, insider trading and other Wall Street sleaze have flourished.

 

For whatever combination of reasons – be it that too many Boomers were cosseted as kids or whether the media came to excessively worship wealth and conspicuous consumption –arrogance and extreme greed came to characterize much of American business under the Baby Boomers. You have to go back to the Twenties and the Gilded Age of the late 19th and very early 20th centuries to see its like.

 

And consider many Boomers’ lack of interest in supporting government programs for the poor and other weak  groups and their generally successful push for lower taxes even as they fight any cuts in programs that benefit, or will soon benefit, them, especially Social Security and Medicare.  And look at the popularity of eliminating the federal estate tax as affluent Boomers’ parents started go to their reward. Or their debonair attitude toward the ever-deepening federal debt that goes with lower taxes and higher spending on programs that disproportionately favor the Boomers.

 

Glance at America’s crumbling infrastructure -- mostly due to a refusal to pay taxes commensurate with long-term public needs – is another monument of the Boomers, too many of whom are not societal builders but users.

 

And it’s curious that older Baby Boomers often get credit for promoting civil rights for racial minorities, women’s and gay rights associated with the ‘60s and early ‘70s, when the people who led these movements were from the so-called Greatest Generation and Silent Generation.

 

And while Steve Jobs and his Silicon Valley contemporaries did come up with some nifty inventions they can’t compare in long-term importance with those  developed by the generation before them – often with the help of federal programs. Semiconductors and Internet are examples.

 

It is true that many Boomers became avid foes of the Vietnam War – but mostly because they didn’t want to fight in it.

 

Let us hope that younger folks display more civic-mindedness and generosity than their parents. Or will they just disappear into social media?

 

xxx

 

President Donald Trump
The uber-Baby Boomer President Trump’s speech Tuesday to Congress was, as showmanship, quite effective – especially of course to his base, many of whose members rarely read but (like the president) get most of their information from TV, and especially from the Republican Party outlet Fox News.  They loved Mr. Trump as a TV performer in the campaign  and on The Apprentice,  and his crazy inaugural address speech for  some of the same reasons. He does have charisma.But many other Americans, even some Democrats, found it unexpectedly soothing.

 

Mr. Trump was under control and even appeared statesmanlike from time to time Tuesday. South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a Democrat, summed it up: “He gives  an ordinary speech, and by not embarrassing the country over the course of an hour, people are astonished.’’

 

The major problem was a minor one  to many in today’s post-literate, visuals-and-sound-obsessed world): lack of real content.

 

And the address was filled with contradictions, magical thinking, outright lies and assertions based on half (or less) truths. In other words, basic Donald Trump, but with a softer tone and calming blue tie.

 

The best and most plausible programmatic thing in the speech was his push for a big national infrastructure plan, although as with all his promises, he presented no clear way of paying for it other than that it would be a public-private program. (He might look at Pennsylvania’s  highly successful public-private infrastructure-rebuilding programs as a partial model.)

 

Just a couple of examples of his dishonesty, his “massive middle class tax cut” would actually be a massive tax cut for the rich, not the middle class. And he complained about how overtaxed the U.S. allegedly is but in  fact the Organization for Economic Cooperation puts America near the bottom of the 34 industrialized nations for tax revenue as a percentage of gross domestic product. The OECD ranks the U.S. 31st, well behind the very prosperous nations of Germany, the U.K., and Denmark.  And the global accounting firm KPMG ranks the U.S. as the 6th "tax friendliest" country in the world.

 

Americans, like most people, don't like to pay taxes; many would rather the country borrow instead; perhaps they’re assuming that they won’t be around to pay the piper. Mr. Trump, of course, is at Olympic levels when it comes to avoiding taxes himself. (By the way, to reduce corruption involving campaign donations and corporate lobbyists,  and to  boost business efficiency, I favor getting rid of the corporate income tax entirely and hiking the personal income tax rate to make up for the lost revenue. In the end, people pay taxes, not inorganic things called ‘’businesses’’.)

 

The major reason that America’s infrastructure is so crummy is that Americans don’t want to pay for it.  Not that long ago, in the ‘50s and ‘60s, they accepted that they had to pay for it. Anyway, in this era of magical economic thinking, I suppose that we’ll make repairs by borrowing another trillion. Pay as you go is just so retro.

 

Mr. Trump also complained that “Ninety-four million Americans are out of the labor force’’ – with the implication, of course, that somehow Barack Obama is to blame. But this huge number includes many millions of elderly retired people, college students and others who don’t want to, and/or can’t, work!

 

And then there was  the misleading stuff in the phrase: “Since my election, Ford, Fiat Chrysler, General Motors, Sprint, SoftBank, Lockheed, Intel, Walmart and many others have announced that they will invest billions of dollars in the United States and will create tens of thousands of new American jobs.”

 

These decisions were made before Mr. Trump’s unlikely election.

 

For many, perhaps most of Donald Trump’s followers, his lies make no difference. So far, he has maintained a very successful cult of personality.  Presumably some sort of crisis – economic, foreign, whatever --  could explode that. But not for a while. And the stock market, as in the summer of 1929, keeps rising….

 

Speaking of lies: Atty. Gen Jeff Sessions’s now-exposed falsehood, told under oath, that he had no meetings with Russian officials during the campaign means he should resign immediately.  His “recusal’ from the case is not enough. Russian president/dictator/murderer, kleptocrat Vladimir Putin, it is now clear, worked hard  with the help of Trump people to get Donald Trump elected president. But then, as Donald Trump Jr. noted back in 2008:

 

 “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our (the Trump Organization’s) assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."

 

And no to Republicans cynically misquoting Barack Obama as saying that the Russians had no effect on the election. He said that so far we know, the Russians didn’t get into voting machines and other mechanical and administrative aspects of the election. As polls and other evidence show, the Niagara of negative stuff about Hillary Clinton produced by the Russian/Wikileaks/Trump collaborative clearly lost her the election. (I wrote in Jim Webb’s name  on the ballot myself.)

 

xxx

 

Gov. Charlie Baker is now looking again at closing the broken, one-mile link in the Northeast rail corridor between South and North stations in  downtown Boston that prevents connectivity between commuter rail systems and interrupts Amtrak service. I hope that he sees this as a priority. Closing the link would ultimately help most New Englanders. This was a dream of former Gov. Michael Dukakis, but fiscal and political pressures blocked the way.

 

xxx

 

Superman Building
Providence’s Industrial Trust Building (aka the Superman Building) might be best used for design studios for Providence’s big art and design community on the first few floors over the ground floor (which could have restaurants and shops), and then apartments and condos and then a restaurant near the top. If none of these soon become economically plausible, then tear the damn thing down; it’s starting to fall apart. The building is probably too clunky and outdated (with its step-backs) to lure  a big company.

 

xxx

The Newport Open Space Partnership is very close to making public its “Open Space Master Plan,” which the Newport Daily News says is the “first citywide open space planning effort since [legendary landscape architect} Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. published “Proposed Improvements for Newport,’’  in  1913. ‘’ Amazing that with all the changes in the City by the Sea in the past century that it has taken this long!

 

“It’s a high-quality planning document,” Scott Wheeler, the city’s arborist and supervisor of buildings, ground and parks, told the paper. “It will be invaluable as a helpful guide to much of what we do. It has already helped us.” Good news for one of the most interesting and colorful cities in America.


The 50 Greatest Living Rhode Islanders

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.