Where is the Opposition to the Tiverton Casino?

Kate Nagle, GoLocal News Editor

Where is the Opposition to the Tiverton Casino?

Legislation to have Twin River put a question to RI voters for a a Tiverton casino - with table games - is before the GA this week; what's the status of the opposition?
The Rhode Island General Assembly is taking up legislation this week to authorize putting a Tiverton casino question on the November ballot — but what is the status of the opposition effort in town? 

The “No Tiverton Casino” Facebook page has just over 330 likes, and last posted on February 4 — with no mention before the recent hearing on the Tiverton casino bill before House Finance on February 9 — or after.  The group’s Twitter account has 16 followers, and last Tweeted in July 2015.  Multiple efforts to reach the group organizer went unanswered. 

“What's going through the General Assembly right now is largely ministerial,” said former Tiverton State Representative and Congressional candidate John Loughlin, who was critical of the Tiverton casino proposition as soon as it was put forth. “They'll put [the measure] on the ballot to voters.  I expect we'll see more action from the opposition in the late summer or fall.”

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

In March 2015, Twin River Casino announced it was acquiring Newport Grand, and the following month revealed its intent to move Newport Grand to Tiverton, with an expansion to included table games, subject to voter approval. The “No Tiverton Casino” website lists “recent updates” around that time - including the town meeting where Twin River officials unveiled the plans to residents in May 2015 — but has not posted updates since.

On Tuesday, the House Finance Committee will take up House Bill 7228, which “authorizes state-operated gaming at a facility located in the town of Tiverton, subject to voter approval.”

A report by Christiansen Capital Advisors submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Revenue in the fall of 2015 examined the fiscal impact of a number of New England-wide gaming scenarios including competition from Massachusetts — and was bullish on the impact of a Tiverton casino, if approved. 

Read the Report HERE

“Our estimates of the impacts of gaming in Massachusetts on Rhode Island revenue if Twin River adds a 200-room hotel and Newport is closed and a new casino opens in Tiverton, Rhode Island…we project that in this scenario total gaming revenue will increase from $570.6 million in FY 2016 to $615.5 million by FY 2021, an increase of 7.3 percent," wrote CCA. "The state’s share of this revenue will grow from $295.0 million in FY 2016 to $313.9 million in FY 2021, an increase of 6.4 percent.”

Tiverton v. Newport

The effort to expand slots to full scale gambling failed in Newport in 2012 and 2014.
In 2014, the question was put on the ballot in Rhode Island to expand gaming at Newport Grand to include table games, and was voted down by residents of Newport, as it had been in 2012.  The measure passed statewide with 56.3% approval in 2014, but in Newport, residents rejected table games 57% to 43% — 4352 votes against outnumbering 3279.  

The town of Tiverton approved the ill-fated measure for table games at Newport Grand in 2014, however, at an even higher level than the statewide result, with 65.8% in support — 3340 votes — to 1737 against. 

Newport resident Liz Taber, who had helped coordinate the Newport opposition effort with Concerned Citizens Against Casino Gambling, spoke to the differences between Newport and Tiverton, as they pertain to the casino question.

“That [Concerned Citizens] group goes way back, having fought the West Warwick proposal way back when,” said Taber, referring to the failed 2006 ballot question. “In Newport, we spent $29,000 fighting the [table games] proposal in 2012, and in 2014 it was closer to $240,000. I’d gotten involved because they were bringing the question of full-fledged gambling to [Aquidneck] Island.”

“Tiverton is a much different animal,” said Taber. “For starters, there’s not the level of competition with local business that we had, and they don’t have an existing building with that awful "SLOTS" marquis.  They’ve got their own set of issues, from having high property taxes, to folks trying not to get “malled” with the proposal for a new one there.  And remember, they voted for table games by an overwhelming margin --  when a casino would be in Newport.”

“Clearly, the yoke’s on the state for the gambling revenue, and Twin River’s playing the whole thing very strategically,” said Taber.  “For starters, the Town of Tiverton’s slated to get a guaranteed $3 million, where as [Newport] would have gotten $450,000."

“If people [in Tiverton] want to reach out to me, I’m here if folks want to talk, although right now I don’t see much being formed,” said Taber. “But my focus now is what do we do in Newport when Newport Grand’s not there.   We need an innovation hub, we need real economic development.  We need to dismantle that highway “bridge to nowhere” that empties out into Newport Grand and free up sixty acres of land.  I want to see something done with that area, we’ve been working on the potential here in Newport since TechWorks first opened.  The last thing we need is for Newport Grand to be turned into justt a massive parking lot.”


Winners and Losers in Raimondo's FY17 Budget Proposal

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.