Riley: Investment Fee Abuse in Rhode Island Public & Private Investments
Michael G. Riley, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™
Riley: Investment Fee Abuse in Rhode Island Public & Private Investments
Michael Riley warns on investment fees -- in both the public AND private sectors in Rhode Island.Readers of this column know I have been relentless about the composition of the State Pension Fund Portfolio and its fees. As Ted Seidle has pointed out in several articles, the Magaziner/Raimondo fund is filled with very high fee investments, some cost RI over 2% annually. Rhode Island taxpayers and retirees have every right to complain about fees because it’s their money or their promises that are being worsened by exorbitant fees.
Does this kind of high fee abuse occur in the private sector?
Oh, yeah it happens. In fact, it is quite common. Recently Barron’s wrote about the thousands of elderly investors being ripped off in various ways not only by scammers but also family and friends. Barron’s called it an epidemic.
Many Rhode Islanders think that by hiring professional money managers, like the big banks who would never charge their clients too much, are insulated from abuse in portfolio advice and management fees.
You might be surprised.
The average investor and High Net Worth investor pays between 1% and 2% of the value of their account to their adviser so they can select appropriate funds for clients and, in addition, the funds selected by your advisor will also charge management fees. Those fees range from .50 % to 1.4% AUM (Assets Under Management). Altogether, the total fee cost to the client is between 1.5% to 3.4%. That is just the “average cost” of individuals using an advisor to professionally manage your investments. Larger accounts can and do negotiate lower fees.
Be very careful and hire someone you trust
Upon closer inspection, I’ve found that fee abuses are rampant and tend to appear or occur upon the death of a family member when one spouse inherits a portfolio for example. We have also seen fee abuse that lasts for years and goes unnoticed. We have Rhode Island clients who formerly had their money managed by wealth management firms affiliated with well-known Big Banks and Brokers.
We reviewed the accounts and found the following abuses in Providence Rhode Island:
Beware “programs" that charge extra fees. We found one Bank in Providence that charges an advisory fee of 2.5% to be split with a “wealth advisor”. In addition to the 2.5% advisor fee, the investor pays a fund fee of 1% to the mutual funds that are also managed by the bank. That’s 3.5%!!!
From a bank “Class P shares held through the xxxx Select Advisors Program are subject to a maximum Program fee of 2.50%, which, if included, would have reduced performance. Class P shares held through other advisory programs also may be subject to a program fee, which, if included, would have reduced performance. Please refer to each Fund's prospectus for further information on the eligibility to purchase Class P shares.” November 2016
You should demand disclosure of your “year to date fees." Amazingly, in one case, It took us days to figure out the fees on an investor statement. Ask your advisor how much did he get paid in fees last year from your account? Ask him where he can find that in the statement. If he can’t then fire him.
Lost Stock certificates- sometimes clients find out that their spouse owns stock certificates and kept them in a safety deposit box or in a safe or an individual has money due from a lost and inactive account that subsequently went to the State. Beware some services are hired by the company (example IBM) who issued the shares or even hired by some States to find the proper owner. That’s all well and good, but they will charge you up to 30% to sell your shares or to properly register them. So, you should just ask your broker or Advisor to do the research for you.
We can all agree that investors in the private sector are usually protected by a broker or Adviser Fiduciary, but not always. I recommend you immediately review your account statements today, if you cannot tell how much you are being charged, just ask your broker or advisor and then get it in writing. If you need more info, ask us or any other Registered Investment Adviser.
Michael G. Riley is vice chair at Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity, and is managing member and founder of Coastal Management Group, LLC. Riley has 35 years of experience in the financial industry, having managed divisions of PaineWebber, LETCO, and TD Securities (TD Bank). He has been quoted in Barron’s, Wall Street Transcript, NY Post, and various other print media and also appeared on NBC News, Yahoo TV, and CNBC.
Timeline - Rhode Island Pension Reform
2005-2010
In the five years before Raimondo was elected, pension changes included a decrease in established retirement age from 65 to 62, increased eligibility to retire, and modified COLA adjustments.
Rhode Island increased mandatory employee contributions for new and current employees. New Mexico was the only other state to mandate current employees to increase their contributions.
Gina Raimondo defeats opponent Kernan King in the election for General Treasurer of Rhode Island using her platform to reform the structure of Rhode Island's public employee pension system. She received 201,625 votes, more than any other politician on the 2010 Rhode Island ballot.
April 2011
Raimondo leads effort to reduce the state’s assumed rate of return on pension investments from 8.25 to 7.5%.
Her proposal includes plans to suspend the Cost of Living Adjustment (which allows for raises corresponding with rates of inflation for retirees), changing the retirement age to match Social Security ages, and adding a defined contribution plan.
May 2011
Raimondo releases “Truth in Numbers”, a report detailing the pension crisis and offering possible solutions. She continues to work to raise public support for her proposal.
"Decades of ignoring actuarial assumptions led to lower taxpayer & employee contributions being made into the system." - Gina Raimondo (Truth in Numbers)
Governor Lincoln Chafee and General Treasurer Gina Raimondo present their pension reform legislation proposal before a joint session of the General Assembly.
“Our fundamental goal throughout this process has been to provide retirement security through reforms that are fair to the three main interested parties: retirees, current employees and the taxpayer…I join the General Treasurer in urging the General Assembly to take decisive action and adopt these reforms.”- Gov. Lincoln Chafee
October 2011
Head of Rhode Island firefighters’ union accuses Raimondo of “cooking the books” to create a pension problem where one did not exist. Paul Valletta Jr. states that Raimondo raised Rhode Islanders’ assumed mortality rate to increase liability to the state, using data from 1994 instead of updated information from 2008, and lowered the anticipated rate of return on state investments.
“You’re going after the retirees! In this economic time, how could you possibly take a pension away?” Paul Valletta Jr (Head of RI Firefighters' Union)
Read more from the firefighters' battle with Raimondo here.
Check out the New York Times' take on RI's pension crisis here.
November 17, 2011
The Rhode Island Retirement Security Act (RIRSA) is enacted by the General Assembly with bipartisan support in both chambers. RIRSA’s passing is slated to reduce the unfunded liability of RI’s pension system and increase its funding status by $3 billion and 60% respectively, level contributions to the pension system by taxpayers, save municipalities $100 million through lessened contributions to teacher and MERS pension systems, and lower the cost of borrowing.
Governor Lincoln Chafee signs RIRSA into law. According to a December 2011 Brown University poll, 60% of Rhode Island residents support the reform. Following its enactment, Raimondo holds regional sessions to educate public employees on the effects of the legislation on their retirement benefits.
Read about how Rhode Islanders react to RIRSA here.
January 2012
Raimondo hosts local workshops to explain the pension reforms across Rhode Island. She also receives national attention for her contributions to the state’s pension reforms. The reforms are given praise and many believe Rhode Island will serve as a template for other States’ future pension reforms.
Read Raimondo's feature in Institutional Investor here.
March - April 2012
Raimondo opposes Governor Chafee’s proposal to cut pension-funded deposits. She continued to provide workshops on the pension reforms.
“The present law is sound fiscal policy and should remain unchanged.” -George Nee (Rhode Island AFL-CIO President)
See WPRI's coverage of Chafee's attempt to cut pension fund deposits here.
December 5, 2012
Raimondo publicly opposes Governor Chafee’s meetings with union leaders in an effort to avoid judicial rulings on the pension reform package. In response, Chafee issues a statement supporting the negotiations.
Led by the Rhode Island State Association of Fire Fighters, unions protest the 2011 pension reform outside of the Omni Providence where Governor Lincoln Chafee and General Treasurer Gina Raimondo conduct a national conference of bond investors.
Read about Raimondo's discussion of distressed municipalities here.
April 2013
The pension plan comes under increased scrutiny as a result of the involvement of hedge funds and private equity firms. Reports show that $200 million of the state pension fund was lost in 2012.
"In short, impressive educational credentials and limited knowledge of investment industry realities made Raimondo ideally suited to champion private equity’s public pension money grab." - Ted Seidle (Forbes)
Read GoLocalProv's coverage of the State Pension Fund's losses here.
Read Ted Seidle's criticism of Raimondo in Forbes.
June 2013
Reports show that the State’s retirement system increased in 2013 by $20 million despite the reforms being put into effect the previous year.
Read GoLocalProv's investigation into the rising pension costs here.
September 2013
Matt Taibbi publishes an article in Rolling Stone detailing Raimondo’s use of hedge funds as a questionably ethical tool to aid with pension reform.