Khrystyne Bento is a Pawtucket ResidentSince we are forced to give our tax money to "friends of the Mayor" via the $3.6 million in tax credits recently approved by Governor Gina Raimondo and Commerce RI - I want to know what's in it for our community?
What's in it for the district in which that building is located? What's in it for the many youth that have no type of afterschool activities? Residents have no place to park within five blocks of that building. All I see out of the millions being funneled to a California developer is that the surrounding community getting out of this deal is a hassle.
That huge building is for a for-profit developer, but not for the community.
What has has this developer given back to the community in which it takes from? Outsiders get to rent space. Adults get to party and eat, for a price. Farmers markets get to sell over-priced produce in the middle of a low-income neighborhood. Cars get free parking at the cost of local residents. The poor homeowners who shovel snow in the winter, come home to find cars from the establishment parked in their spaces.
I question the Mayor's motivation
I question the Mayor's motivation, he can't imagine he hooks them all up for nothing. Rich get richer, yet what are the kids getting out of it?
There are no community centers fully operational in the neighborhood, no space big enough to accommodate indoor activities to get kids off streets, no community services that are desperately needed here in Pawtucket. No summertime activities free for kids. No food bank for starving families in that neighborhood. No affordable units, no jobs available for locals.
The city requested $50,000 of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) money for construction to be done to another building to house Launch Code, a program being plugged by the Governor Raimondo and Mayor Grebien.
After months of discussion about why Launch Code would not be beneficial to that particular center in Pawtucket, the program deciding to go to URI, but then all of a sudden Launch Code is back is going into the Hope Artiste Village building. I'm not convinced that it was another secret agenda, to secure funding, using a camouflage only to use the funding elsewhere, after it's been approved. Will the California developer be getting the $50,000 CDBG funding also?
It is no wonder some of the few small businesses that went into that building, started to do well and all of a sudden closed down. It is all making sense now. Two of the minority business owners that have gone in, remodeled the space, and then got left hung out to dry. The developer Lance Robbins threatens to bankrupt anyone who gets on his bad side. More of the same bullying mentality used by our city hall. I'm not at all surprised.
Five million being requested in funding for a dome on city hall and now $3.6 million on an entertainment venue/fancy living.
That's more than eight million that could provide services to every single student with afterschool programs, tutoring, summer camp, and a jobs for young adults year round for years. The spending in this city is ridiculous. Why should anyone be paying car tax if they can't park their cars anywhere near their homes?
Excuse me, but what exactly does California developer Robbins need $3.6 million for? Unless he will dedicate some of that massive space for improvements to people in that neighborhood, not only should he not get their hard earned money, he should go elsewhere with his annoying ideas. Why would he, when the politicians are treating him better than the taxpayers, voters, and residents in which they "serve."
I disagree when I read statements made about Governor Raimondo that she caters to women and minorities. The majority of the minorities here in Pawtucket are completely ignored and dismissed, while she and the Mayor help give to everyone, but the real community.
The majority minority in this city who also make up a huge percentage in the same district as Hope Village, but don't get fair treatment by police and suffer from lack of understanding of cultural differences in school system. There is a lack of jobs in the neighborhoods in which those mills use to provide to thousands in that area. There are no language support in the department of human services which leads to them being declined needed services unless they speak English or Spanish.
Maybe the Mayor wants to use Hope Artiste to distract from the real issues being ignored here.
Khrystyne Bento is a Pawtucket Resident
Lance Robbins Controversies Through the Years
TENANTS WHO BATTLE ARMIES OF RATS SUE LANDLORD
LINDA DEUTSCH, Associated Press
Jun. 5, 1986
Residents of a dilapidated building who say they regularly fight off armies of giant rats, swarms of cockroaches and youth gangs that roam their hallways have sued the building's owner for $10 million.
Attorneys for the Spanish-speaking residents related nightmarish stories of cockroaches biting sleeping children, a rat they said tried to drag a baby from its bed and another that allegedly attacked a man in the shower.
They said tenants feel rats crawl over them at night and some stand guard over babies all night, fighting off the rodents with brooms and slingshots.
The lawyers opened roach traps on the front steps of the South Union Street building near downtown to display dozens of huge cockroaches, some still crawling, which they said were caught in the building overnight.
The lawsuit, filed jointly in Superior Court by four private and public- interest law firms, accuses building owner Lance J. Robbins and his associates of refusing to make repairs, curb vermin infestation or provide reliable water, electricity or security in the 40-unit building, which houses large families in one-room apartments.
Robbins said Wednesday that none of his employees in the building have seen any rats and, ''I wouldn't be a bit surprised if a lot of this at the news conference was staged.''
Los Angeles Times, August 8, 1986, "Landlord Issues 5 More Violations"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 1 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 2 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 3 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2000 PART 4 on the article Titled, "City Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against Landlord"
Los Angeles Times, March 26, 2002, "Slumlords Donated to Delgadillo"
Los Angeles Times, Oct 25, 2005
Los Angeles Times, Nov. 1, 2005, "State Moves to Pull Real Estate Liense of L.A. Landlord"
Robbins Loses Real Estate License
Realty Times, January 18, 2010
Real estate broker and attorney, Lance Robbins, both owned and managed numerous "slumlord" apartments in the city of Los Angeles. This, as acknowledged by Robbins's attorney, was an extremely lucrative business. The record suggests, though, that Robbins took less than adequate care of the apartments under his control. Between 1985 and 1995, Robbins had been convicted of some 50 municipal building code violations. He was twice disciplined (1991 and 1994) by the State Bar for "facts and circumstances surrounding habitability violations in properties" that he owned.
In January of 2001, Robbins pleaded nolo contendere and was convicted of three misdemeanor violations of the fire protection and prevention provisions of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. He was fined $100 and placed on summary probation for 18 months. In March of 2003 the Department of Real Estate filed an accusation alleging that Robbins's convictions constituted cause for the suspension or revocation of his license as a broker.
Lauren Saunders of the National Consumer Law Center is one of the top tenant advocacy attorneys told GoLocal on Tuesday.
Robbins was one of the most dishonest and unscrupulous people I have come across in my career working for vulnerable tenants and consumers. I cannot imagine entrusting any city money to him.
Lance Robbins was the worst slumlord in L.A. history. The city's Slum Housing Task Force prosecuted him numerous times for horrible conditions at his buildings. He also ran up huge water bills at his buildings that he refused to pay, and the city was reluctant to shut off the water for fear of harming the tenants. I filed a False Claims Act case against him and he was forced to pay $1 million in back water bills.
He was also extremely ingenious about using a complex web of sham corporations to avoid liability. After the fines from his slum violations and his back water bills started adding up, he started foreclosing against himself and putting his buildings into receivership to escape accountability. His buildings were in numerous different corporations and partnerships and he put loans in other names against his own buildings, then started a foreclosure action. He then asked the court to appoint a "neutral" receiver who he chose who actually just let Robbins stay in control of the building. We detailed that in the same lawsuit.
Developer Getting $3.6M in RI Tax Credits Sued by N. Carolina Town for Backing Out of Project
Urban Smart Growth (USG), the developer who just received nearly $3.6 million in tax credits from Governor Gina Raimondo and the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation, was sued by the Town of Belville, North Carolina, in 2015 for backing out of a project, GoLocal has learned...
Robbins and USG stated on Monday that they are intending to utilize the Rhode Island tax credits to complete a $38.9 million project to develop 150 loft apartments at Hope Artiste Village in Pawtucket.
However, in North Carolina, a stalled USG project has led to the Town of Belville to seek arbitration, following its 2015 lawsuit against USG, who in 2007 had entered into a twenty-year agreement to develop a mixed-used project along the town's waterfront.
Not only did the project never come to fruition, press reports show that USG engaged in discussions with the adjacent town of Leland to annex Belville's downtown and undertake the project with them instead.
"We need to bring [Robbins] to light. It's really a shame-- he goes and buys up cheap property and tries and hoodwinks the local city councils to fund this kind of development," said Peter Schardien, who is the husband of Belville Commissioner Donna Schardien, of Robbins. "He's an attorney, or he used to be, and he knows how to get around things. He's no good."
Former Business Partner of Robbins of USG Sued and Received $28M - and Warns RI
Frank Gamwell, a former business partner of Lance Robbins of Urban Smart Growth (USG), has said that he would "never do business with him again" after suing Robbins for $28 million and ultimately receiving the amount in arbitration.
Now, Gamwell is warning that Rhode Island should be doing its "due diligence" in dealing with Robbins.
On Monday, USG was awarded $3.6 million in tax credits from Governor Gina Raimondo and the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation to develop lofts at Hope Artiste Village.
"This Just Isn't Fair,” Says Restaurant Owner About Developer Robbins Getting $3.6M in RI Tax Credits
A former restaurant owner at Hope Artiste Village said that she "wished she had sued" Urban Smart Growth (USG), the management company that was awarded $3.6 million in tax credits from the RI Commerce Corporation this week.
Rosinha Benros, who had opened and owned the restaurant "Rosinha" at Hope Artiste Village, said she had a number of issues with USG -- including having had gas being turned off due to USG not having paid their National Grid bill.
"I opened that space, I created that place," Benros told GoLocal on Thursday, of the restaurant she ran for over three years. "I can't even drive by, I loved that place so much. It just breaks my heart."
Benros said that issues with the change in management, coupled with having problems with The Met being located next door, led in part to her closing the restaurant.
USG's CEO and principal is controversial developer Lance Robbins, who in California was cited with 105 health and building-code violations, piled up 32 convictions, paid a $1 million fine, to name a few of his legal problems, according to press reports.
RI Security Firm Says Developer Robbins of USG Won’t Pay $23K Bill
A former security services vendor for Hope Artiste Village is claiming that owner Urban Smart Growth (USG) never paid them $23,583 for services in a six-month span starting in 2013.
“We started services on December 13, 2013 and ended services on June 21, 2014. They paid a total of six invoices during our services,” said Karen Voisard with Metropolitan Public Safety, who provided the check stubs from USG. “As of current standing with the company we are owed $23,583.00 for eighteen overdue invoices. That doesn't include any of the late charges as stated in our contract.”
Former Owner of Blaze Restaurant: USG’s Robbins “Threatened to Bankrupt Me”
Phyllis Arffa, the originator and owner of the restaurant Blaze, said that Lance Robbins of Urban Smart Growth threatened to bankrupt her when her business was struggling at Hope Artiste Village.
Arffa, who owned and operated Blaze on Hope Street in Providence before moving to Hope Artist Village in 2015, said that she has had to go back to working in a kitchen to pay back $70,000 in debt that she accrued while trying to make Blaze work under Robbins, which she said she ultimately had to step away from due to financial and health reasons.
"I wish I never met [Robbins]. I had money in the bank, we were all set to relax for a little while," said Arffa after moving from Hope Street to the Hope Artiste village. "Now, I'm working 12 to 12 to just to pay back what I owe."
Arffa showed a text sent by Robbins threatening to bankrupt her.
Robbins Crushed Local Baker
The former owner of the Bread Lab at Hope Artiste Village, which is owned by controversial developer Lance Robbins, said she found him to be “morally bankrupt” as she was forced to close her operations in 2015.
Deana Martin, who had owned the Bread Lab with her husband, said that she battled with Robbins over a number of issues -- including the insurance money following the destruction of her bakery equipment due to the mill’s sprinklers going off one night.
“If you don't give him what he wants, he'll use whatever leverage he has to get what wants,” said Martin. “If it furthers his benefit, he'll take it from you, and the legal proceedings are just that — if he wins, he claims he’s not ‘guilty.’
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Translation service unavailable. Please try again later.