RIPEC Report Says Truck Toll Plan Raises Too Much Money, Mattiello Responds

GoLocalProv News Team

RIPEC Report Says Truck Toll Plan Raises Too Much Money, Mattiello Responds

The Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council (RIPEC) released on Wednesday its analysis of the RhodeWorks truck toll proposal before the General Assembly -- and according to RIPEC’s analysis, the current plan would "generate substantial long-term funding for transportation projects, but may not provide sufficient revenue in the short-term." 

The report includes a cash-flow analysis of the current proposal contained in H. 7409 and S. 2246, which consists of $300 million in additional borrowing and $45 million in new tolling revenue annually, as well as three alternative models for financing the RhodeWorks program. 

Speaker Nicholas Mattiello immediately responded to RIPEC's claims. 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

“The plan that we are moving forward with is the right one and the analysis by RIPEC confirms that it is very viable.  I respect RIIPEC’s work greatly and this analysis will be shared with the House Finance Committee and thoroughly reviewed at tomorrow’s hearing.  I was also extremely pleased that the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce strongly endorsed the RhodeWorks plan today at the annual legislative luncheon,” said Mattiello.

Read the Full Report HERE

“The plan that we are moving forward with is the right one and the analysis by RIPEC confirms that it is very viable.  I respect RIIPEC’s work greatly and this analysis will be shared with the House Finance Committee and thoroughly reviewed at tomorrow’s hearing. I was also extremely pleased that the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce strongly endorsed the RhodeWorks plan today at the annual legislative luncheon," said Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello.  

Speaker Mattiello
Long Term vs. Short Term

RIPEC conducted a cash-flow analysis comparing the Rhode Island Department of Transportation’s (RIDOT) publicly-stated expenditure needs with available funding which found that RIDOT faces an estimated funding gap of approximately $450.6 million over the six years from FY2016 to FY2021. The transportation finance proposal before the General Assembly is supposed to eliminate the funding gap through increased borrowing and placing tolls on large commercial trucks in a number of locations throughout the state. 

RIPEC’s analysis found that the proposal does not provide sufficient resources to meet RIDOT’s annual cash flow requirements in FY 2020, FY 2021, and FY 2022, but does provide sufficient resources to meet RIDOT’s entire ten-year funding requirements over the FY 2016 – FY 2025 period. RIPEC adds that the current proposal would result in a "substantial accumulation of unprogrammed funds at the end of the FY 2016 – FY 2032 period."

Alternative Models 

The report also includes cash-flow models for three alternative financing plans developed by RIPEC for the FY 2016 – FY 2025 period, as well as for an extended time period from FY 2016 – FY 2032. 

According to RIPEC, each of the three alternative plans provides sufficient funding for the RhodeWorks program, including bridge repairs and maintenance, reconstruction of the Route 6/10 Interchange and all other proposed transportation programs and projects, for each of the years included in the analysis.

RIPEC Model 1 includes increased borrowing only, with no tolling program or other sources of new or increased revenue. RIPEC Models 2 and 3 consider the implications of reducing the $45 million tolling program and increasing the size of the $300 million GARVEE bond currently under consideration.

Costs

Speaker Mattiello
A comparison of the current proposal and the three RIPEC models finds that the current proposal entails the greatest local cost over the FY 2016 – FY 2036 period. Under the assumption that a minimum of 40.0 percent of the tolling cost will be borne by local entities, and including interest costs, the current proposal is estimated to have a total local cost of $531.4 million between FY 2016 and FY 2036. 

RIPEC Model 1, which assumes a GARVEE borrowing of $515 million and no tolling, was found to have a total local cost of $282.2 million over the same time period. 

RIPEC Model 2, which assumes a GARVEE borrowing of $435 million and $20 million in tolling revenue annually, was found to have a total local cost of $368.3 million. 

RIPEC Model 3, which assumes a GARVEE borrowing of $400 million and $30 million in tolling revenue annually, was found to have a total local cost of $409.3 million.

Unprogrammed Surplus

RIPEC’s analysis of the current proposal also found that while it may not generate sufficient revenue to meet RIDOT’s capital needs in the short-term, it would result in a large unprogrammed surplus over the long-term. By the end of the FY 2016 and FY 2032 time period, the current proposal would result in an unprogrammed surplus of approximately $701.7 million. 

Each of the three RIPEC alternative models would also result in a unprogrammed surplus by FY 2032, though to a smaller degree than the current proposal.


Winners and Losers in Raimondo's FY17 Budget Proposal

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.