Elorza Miscalculates, More Budget and Firefighter Chaos

GoLocalProv News Team and Kate Nagle

Elorza Miscalculates, More Budget and Firefighter Chaos

Mayor Jorge Elorza's proposed firefighter contract savings were found to be inflated by $7 million by the city's internal auditor.
The Providence City Council announced on Thursday that the city’s internal auditor found the Elorza administration overestimated the savings touted in the proposed firefighter contract by $7 million — and City Council President Luis Aponte is raising concerns. 

Internal Auditor Matt Clarkin, who had been with the city in 2010 when he unveiled Providence’s near financial collapse, addressed his findings in a memo addressed to City Council Finance Chair John Igliozzi.  

Clarkin stated that based upon “the proposed personnel changes associated with the reduction of the minimum manning requirement to 88 from 94 per shift, the decommissioning of three pieces of apparatus, and the addition of 12 battalion chiefs, it is projected that these changes will result in a net savings of approximately $9.1 million . . . the Administration projected in its fiscal note that the change to minimum manning clause would result in savings of approximately $16 million during the [five year] period of the [tentative agreement].”

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

It was Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza who had touted the purported contract savings in September, but the city released a statement in response to Clarkin from Commissioner of Public Safety Steven Pare — which disagreed with Clarkin’s findings.

“The administration stands behind the numbers provided in the fiscal note for the tentative agreement with the firefighters’ union,” Pare. “We aggressively disagree with the claims from the City Council and will respond accordingly.”

City Council President Aponte said that he found the discrepancy “concerning,” however. 

“We went through a year of difficult times to get to a point where we could realize some savings,” said Aponte. “You weigh the short term savings and what that means with what the long term structural changes that are provided for in this contract. There are immediate questions about the length of contract that need to be answered."

“We need to ask the administration how they arrive at $16 million [in savings]  and what else they didn’t consider,  and what might be unknowns, before the committee moves forward,” Aponte added. 

Latest in Contract 

The contract was touted as signaling the end to the recent acrimony between the firefighters and Elorza (seen here).
When Elorza announced in September that the city had reached a “tentative agreement” with the firefighters, it was not over the protracted legal battle — and associated costs — but rather the tentative five-year contract reached by both parties that Elorza said would result in $15 million in savings. 

As GoLocal reported on September 12:

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza is claiming $15 million in savings over the next five years in his announcement of a newly negotiated contract with Providence Firefighters on Monday -- but refused to acknowledge the potential of over $9 million in overtime costs still in dispute, stemming from when Elorza changed the department from four platoons to three in 2015.

The following month in October, City Council Finance Chair John Igliozzi accused Elorza and the city of “backing into” the contract, having not received a fiscal note four weeks after the contract and purported savings were touted. 

“What is troubling is that the administration touted a contract with all of these savings with no financial backup or fiscal note -- so what is concerning is that they seem to be doing the financial work now, after they negotiated terms, which leads one to believe they're back into these “savings,” said Igliozzi. “Which makes the whole submission of the contract suspect.”

Following Clarkin’s revelation this week, the Providence Firefighters union head Paul Doughty urged the city — and city council — to move forward on the contract.

“I think there's always going to be disagreement of the numbers,” said Doughty, who is the president of Local 799 of the International Association of Firefighters. “Don't lose sight of the fact that it is a contract that saves money regardless of which numbers are more accurate.”

“Every day we sit on this, the bill continues to grow,” said Doughty.  “They worry about this, but every month [that goes by] it’s a million in back pay, and that’s [Clarkin’s] own calculation.”

“We just want an up or down vote,” he added. “In any scenario, it’s a money saving contract.”


10 Biggest Issues Facing Providence in 2016

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.