Providence Residents Increasing Opposition to PawSox Stadium

Kate Nagle, GoLocal Contributor

Providence Residents Increasing Opposition to PawSox Stadium

Providence residents opposed to a Providence PawSox stadium increased organizational efforts on Monday night at the Rochambeau Library in Providence  -- and one group leader said he has no plans to register as a lobbyist, following the issue being raised among advocacy groups in recent weeks.

While the new Pawtucket Red Sox ownership group has been conducting a "listening" tour throughout the state's 39 cities and towns, a group of Pawtucket residents has been vocal in their efforts to halt the prospect of their home team's move -- and one of its leaders has been staunchly against having to register as a lobbyist, despite receiving a clarification letter from the Office of the Secretary of State explaining what might require him to do so.

Now, a group of Providence residents is preparing to more formally mobilize against any stadium proposal -- whether there is taxpayer assistance requested or not.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

"We've got a lot of folks who are interested in getting involved, so we organized a meeting to let them know of what's going on, and what they can do," said group organizer Sam Bell.  "We clearly think that the park use for which that land is intended for is its best use, not a stadium. Even if the new ownership group were to come back and say they wanted no public assistance -- which we can't see happening at this point, given their statewide efforts -- we don't feel a stadium on that location is the best or highest use of that land."

Lobbyist Definition in Question

Following the "lobbying letters" sent to the groups Organizing for Pawtucket -- as well as RI Taxpayers -- outlining current state lobbying statutes, Bell said he does not agree with the Secretary of State's office that the act of simply supporting or opposing legislation would require someone to register as a lobbyist -- especially if they are not paid. 

Lobbying front and center once again -- see what another stadium opponent has to say.
"No, I don't think I have to register as a lobbyist," said Bell.  "There's a very distinct definition of lobbyist and lobbying as it pertains to the executive branch. My sense is if I'm not getting paid, the definition of "lobbyist" doesn't apply, although certain activities might fall under the umbrella of 'lobbying.'  I registered once for years back, at the urging of the Secretary of State's office, and ultimately determined it didn't fall under that definition."

Pawtucket's David Norton reported getting a letter from Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea's office outlining the terms -- and activities -- that would require someone to register as a lobbyist (as did PawSox CEO Mike Tumburro), but Norton said even if legislation were introduced, he would not register as a lobbyist. 

On July 16 the Rhode Island American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sent a letter to Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea outlining their perspective about such letters as they pertain to free speech.

"We recognize the legitimate motivations underlying [the] letters," wrote the ACLU. "However, for the future, we would urge that you office adopt clear and public standards for determining under what circumstances and to whom these letters should be sent, and that they be sent only when there is relatively clear evidence that the conduct prompting your office's interest involves the type of core lobbying activity the law was specifically designed to address."

Read the ACLU letter HERE

Providence Effort

Prior to July 27 organizational meeting, the Providence group had collected over 1,000 signatures to present to the city council for a voter initiative which under the Providence Home Rule Charter "allows residents to collect 1,000 signatures to bring an ordinance to the City Council," said Bell of the anti-stadium effort. "If the City Council does not approve it, the Charter allows residents to go and get more signatures to put it on the ballot.”

Bell noted that the group decided to wait until the CC was back in session before delivering the petition. 

"We waited until they dealt with the new TSAs," said Bell.  "We get the impression that the Mayor's office is very much for this [stadium] project.  We think that we'll be able to get the support in the City Council for the voter initiative.  I don't know how any council member -- knowing of the widespread opposition to this project -- could vote in favor of enabling a stadium to be built."

Bell said in his organizing email that he was bolstered by comments made by Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed as a potential for sidelining a new deal being put forth in a fall General Assembly session. 

"Most recently [Paiva-Weed], who has the power to stop this deal, has said she won' bring the deal up in a special session," wrote Bell in a recent email to stadium opponents. "This is a big win. The politicians are feeling the pressure. But we have work to do to."

Jewelry District Association president Sharon Steele, who is active in the group alongside Bell, said the group of Providence residents is continuing to combat the stadium

"That land was originally intended for a park, and that's what is should be," said Steele. "One of the things that's not been looking into in enough detail is the environmental impact a stadium would have on that land, on the water, storm water runoff.  This group is opposed to a stadium on that land. Period."


Pawsox Stadium Timeline

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.