Guest MINDSETTER ™ Art Norwalk: Should We Swing at the PawSox Owners’ Next Pitch?

Guest MINDSETTER ™ Art Norwalk

Guest MINDSETTER ™ Art Norwalk: Should We Swing at the PawSox Owners’ Next Pitch?

I don’t know if it makes sense for the state and city to provide public funds and/or tax relief for a baseball stadium on the 195 land. More to the point, I don’t think our political leaders know if it makes sense either.

Nonetheless, as Rhode Islanders enjoy their summer vacations, a new stadium deal between the Raimondo administration and the new owners of the Pawtucket Red Sox is taking shape behind closed doors. If those negotiators come to an agreement and sell it to the leaders of the General Assembly, it’s likely to be a done deal.

Yes, House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello has promised public hearings, but if the leadership and the administration are on board it would take a major groundswell of public opinion to undo it. If a deal is announced just a short time before a brief special session of the General Assembly, there would be no realistic opportunity for the public to evaluate it and, if necessary, organize to oppose it.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

This is not to say that the deal will necessarily be bad or deserve rejection. But it is to say that the current process doesn’t do much to build confidence in the way our government makes decisions.

While financial negotiations can’t be conducted in public, there are several key issues that can and should be discussed and decided openly before government leaders continue talking with the owners privately about dollars.

Our leaders could do themselves and the rest of us a great service by trying this intellectual exercise: put yourselves back in time to a point before the proposed PawSox move to Providence was announced, then make a list of the top ten developments you think would be most beneficial on the 195 land. Is a minor league baseball stadium on your list?  I’m guessing not.

The reason is that, despite the owners’ PR blitz, the value of a downtown Providence stadium is not self-evident. It depends on credible and satisfactory answers to questions like these:

    •    Would a stadium be good for the city and state? Are the owners right in claiming that it would create good jobs, attract other job-producing businesses to the surrounding area and improve the reputations and economic climate of Providence and Rhode Island?
    •    Would a stadium be a good use of the proposed waterfront portion of the 195 land? Are the owners right in claiming that a stadium would support the long-stated goals of high-paying tech, manufacturing, meds and eds jobs on the reclaimed land?
    •    Would a stadium improve entertainment and recreational opportunities in downtown Providence?
    •    Is a stadium the highest and best use of the proposed location, or is it the use that’s easily available right now?

    •    What about parkland and storm water requirements? If a stadium is built on the proposed site, will additional parts of the 195 land have to be set aside for a park and/or storm water handling? How many acres should be diverted from job-producing and potentially taxpaying uses?
    •    Is it appropriate for the state to spend tax dollars to move a private business from one Rhode Island community to another?
    •    How much should the state be willing to pay just to keep the team in Rhode Island?

Why must these questions be answered before a new deal is negotiated?

Until we have objectively researched answers, we have no way of knowing whether any amount of public money should be put into a stadium. Then, if we decide that public investment in a stadium is a good idea in principle, we need to have a way of determining what would be a fair price.
Getting the answers up front would be in the best interests of everyone involved.

If the public doesn’t get satisfactory answers to all these questions in advance of a financial deal, the widespread mood of negativity created by the disastrous first deal will almost certainly either sink any new deal or create political liabilities for the governor and legislative leaders. Or both. Whether or not the new deal has merit.

The current “listening tour” by team representatives contributes nothing but hype, and having the state leaders do a deal without publicly establishing need or value of what they want us to buy is just wrong. Even assuming good faith, there’s too much opportunity for a deal we would come to regret.
Negotiations between the state and the team should be suspended until the questions above have been answered through an open, public process.

I’m not holding my breath for that to happen, but without that information -- in advance -- we’ll have no good way of deciding whether to swing at the team owners’ next pitch or let it go by.

Art Norwalk, of Providence, is a freelance writer and marketing communications consultant. He was a political reporter for Channel 10 more years ago than he cares to admit.

Pawsox Stadium Timeline

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.