Riley: How to Fix Narragansett - And All RI Municipal Pension Issues

Michael G. Riley, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™

Riley: How to Fix Narragansett - And All RI Municipal Pension Issues

Rhode Island has very high tax rates and specifically high property tax rates, which are largely used for the schools and municipal services demanded by citizens. The vast majority of those costs are the salaries and wages of town employees and school-related wages and salaries.

An increasingly large component of current taxes is used to pay for promises made to employees that will be paid in 20 years or so. The work of a ten-year employee has been paid for in salary, but part of the promise is that employee will receive 75% or more of the highest salary in his career, in 20 years and then for another 20 years, plus future healthcare costs.

Who should pay for current employees promised benefits? In theory, the consumer of the services and their total cost should pay. That is the current taxpayer. But in reality, not only do current taxpayers not pay the full cost of services neither did their recent predecessors and now we have legacy costs that go unpaid for generations.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Doesn’t this generation owe it to their children and grandchildren to fully pay for services already rendered? Why do we knowingly and blindly pass on these costs? They are not going to go away, in fact, the problem grows larger every day.

Narragansett

Recently I overheard a town councilman so proud that property taxes were only going up 1.5% this year. Narragansett has gained a reputation for having low tax rates (I think it’s more accurate to say high assessments) but anyway, the typical election year lie is I keep your taxes low.

While true on the face of it, the truth is town officials consciously do not fund future health care cost and have $40+ million in unfunded liabilities in the pension plan. Who is going to pay for that $100 million in tax obligations?  Narragansett could decide to contribute even less annually to the pensions of town hall workers, fire, and police and thus lower current citizens property taxes even more.

What is moral or fair? Should current citizens pay the bill for already earned pensions or pass it along to Narragansett citizens of 2026. Maybe we should eliminate taxes for pensions altogether. We will just pay current salaries and hope things work out. Maybe you plan to move before the crisis hits and you want a homestead rebate now as Narragansett Council recently passed.

Narragansett elected officials have known about the pension crisis on the horizon since 2005 when I first started advocating action. Like many cities in Rhode Island, elected officials claim to be tax efficient and continue to make unpayable promises to unions with no intent to deal with the problem of actually funding both past and current promises.

The right thing for Narragansett to do is put all new hires in a defined 401K style defined contribution plan and close all defined benefit plans and then increase property taxes at least 4%. The bulk of tax increases should go to funding pension obligations in the form of an annual additional cash funding fee until the pension funding ratio exceeds 75%.

If every town did this, they would be properly assigning current taxpayers more responsibility for the people they have elected and the swindle they have pulled with our knowledge.

Michael G. Riley is vice chair at Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity and is managing member and founder of Coastal Management Group, LLC. Riley has 35 years of experience in the financial industry, having managed divisions of PaineWebber, LETCO, and TD Securities (TD Bank). He has been quoted in Barron’s, Wall Street Transcript, NY Post, and various other print media and also appeared on NBC News, Yahoo TV, and CNBC. 

The Power List - Politics, 2016

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.