Gencarella: The Toll Plan - One Mell of A Hess

Pam Gencarella, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™

Gencarella: The Toll Plan - One Mell of A Hess

(See How They Voted)

The Foundation Of The Plan Questioned.

When the governor first presented her toll plan, not only was it shrouded in mystery, but it had a major error - the classification of trucks on which she would toll.
 
Once that mistake was corrected, Raimondo then refused to release very important data that would allow an analysis by the public, including legislators, to make an informed decision - namely the gantry locations and the study of diversion rates.
After much cajoling, she released the potential gantry locations, however she still hasn’t released the diversion study.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Since the plan’s introduction, the trucking industry, an industry in which there are numerous organizations keeping track of various important statistics, challenged some critical data, data used to determine the most important piece of the toll scheme - estimated toll revenue. Her response has been continued use of her own set of data, never addressing the discrepancies.

So here we sit with a plan that would literally and figuratively change the face of RI forever and yet it was rushed through the legislative body without resolving the issues noted above.

And, Consider This.

Meanwhile, there are other significant outstanding questions, in addition to those we have cited above, and now the bill has become law.

Representative Hull (D-Providence), a member of the Finance committee, said he voted NO on tolls because recently released studies indicated that the toll plan actually costs more than straight up borrowing.  Why would the General Assembly pass major public policy if it costs more than alternative plans that could get the job done? And why would state government institute a plan that, according to the RI Public Expenditure Council (RIPEC), will amass a huge accumulation of tax dollars well after the need for funding bridge repair?  

On the one hand, the governor has said all along that states across the country have tolls and made it seem like RI was the outlier. Yet, according to a report, the state distributed documents for RFPs (requests for proposals) indicating that the toll plan is of a “unique nature” and “relatively unprecedented”.  So now the governor believes RI is an outlier with this oddity in public policy?

When referencing tolls in other states, like everything else, the big picture is important.  Looking at NH, which subjects vehicles to tolling, you must consider that the state has no sales tax and virtually no income tax (they only tax interest and dividends and even at that, the rate is only 5%).  According to the Tax Foundation, NH ranks a mere 7th, while RI ranks 45th in highest taxes.  So how much more damage will be done to RI’s business climate with the apparent need for RI state government to create yet another new stream of funding given our already incredibly high cost of taxation?  And further, what were the backroom deals made amongst the speaker, the senate president and the governor to get this mess passed into law and what will the impact of those deals be on the taxpayer?

The $64,000 Question.

Meanwhile the American Trucking Association (ATA) is confident that they have a strong case supporting their claim that the toll legislation is unconstitutional. The only problem is they won’t be able to bring a lawsuit until the first toll is collected. That apparently won’t be taking place anytime soon, some expect until the end of 2017. And if the ATA is successful in its claim, what will that mean for the significant investment the state will already have made into this public policy and what will state government do to resolve it?  

A Plan Still In Flux.

And then there are the open questions as to how the toll will actually work. The RFP stated “RIDOT may also consider differential rates between single trailer and tandem trailer truck vehicle combinations."  And, although she reluctantly published a list of 14 toll gantry locations, the governor said she may need more.  

When Ocean State Job Lot made enough noise about halting expansion because the tax relief for RI truckers was removed in the revised legislation, there were apparent promises made behind the scenes (consistent with the setting of RI public policy) which hopefully would benefit all affected RI companies.  But policies to help local companies will naturally reduce the expected increase in RI’s coffers.

During the toll debate on the House floor, members referred to potential future legislation that would somehow help RI truckers in a similar manner to the original proposal. The original proposal provided approximately $13 million in tax credits/rebates. Won’t that policy help the argument supporting the unconstitutionality of the tolling policy?

Net Impact Of The Scheme Still In Play.

When all told, how much of the annual toll revenue will actually go to bridge repair?  The new estimate of $45 million, reduced for the cost of new borrowings and the maintenance of the gantries, will bring it down to about $25 million. If there is some form of tax credit/rebate and it remains at around $13 million, that leaves the state with about $12 million in new annual toll revenue. An insignificant amount for a massive expansion of government, the decimation of the trucking industry and the risk that none of it even works out in the end.  

Couple the lack of revenue with the fact that, no sooner did the toll bill pass, and immediately the DOT is in a frenzy, moving as fast as they can, hiring new people, creating new positions, and raising salaries. So, while the first toll is not expected to be collected for more than a year and a half, the state will be spending like crazy, increasing the size of government, and the entire scheme may eventually fall under its own weight with a constitutional challenge.

What a mess.  And, in the end, who is always left to clean up that mess?

Note: OSTPA would like to thank the legislators who stood up for the taxpayer, some of whom experienced reprisals for the decision to vote NO on tolls.

Representatives Canario, Chippendale, Costa, Costantino, Filippi, Giarrusso, Hull, Lancia, MacBeth, Marcello, Morgan, Nardolillo, Newberry, Nunes, Phillips, Price, Reilly, Roberts, Solomon, Trillo, and Winfield, along with

Senators Algiere, Cote, Gee, Jabour, Kettle, Morgan, O’Neill, Pagliarini, Picard, Raptakis, Satchell, and Sheehan.

You can see a complete listing of the representatives and senators on www.stoptollsri.com where you will see that Representatives Craven and Malik, along with Senator Lombardo, did not go on the record regarding tolls.


RI Truck Tolls Controversy -- 2016

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.