Battle Erupts Between Legal Titans Over Remnants of Failed Benrus

GoLocalProv News Team

Battle Erupts Between Legal Titans Over Remnants of Failed Benrus

Giovanni Feroce, former CEO of the now highly litigated Benrus
Benrus was supposed to be the next great Rhode Island consumer product company, but now it is a battleground for some of the biggest names in Rhode Island’s legal circles. The once iconic World War II watch company went into receivership in December 2017 and is now a colosseum for a high-stakes courtroom clash.

On one side is Max Wistow — the master litigator who has made his mark in recovering $65 million in 38 Studios funds for the State of Rhode Island, was a lead litigator in the Station Fire case, and now serves as the special investigator looking into the collapse of the St. Joseph Health Service pension fund — the largest retirement fund collapse in Rhode Island history.

In the Benrus case, Wistow represents the receiver for Benrus, Richard Gemma.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

On the other side is Mike Sweeney — one of Rhode Island’s top corporate attorneys and now the owner of the Benrus trademarks and the de facto, new Benrus company.

Neither party has anything positive to say about the mismanagement of former Benrus CEO Giovanni Feroce. He is now a GOP candidate for governor of Rhode Island and he refused to comment on this pending lawsuit.

Of the nine candidates now running for governor, a poll conducted by Harvard’s John Della Volpe, in partnership with GoLocalProv, found that Feroce is the least electable candidate. The poll was released last week - see results below.

In May 2017, Feroce appeared on GoLocal LIVE and claimed that the company was stable.  For Feroce, who had been snarled in a number of legal battles, the biggest battle was over the control of Benrus trademarks and he claimed in May that those battles were behind the company. 

"The number one issue is the stability of an organization. I'm happy it was amicably settled," said Feroce regarding the trademark issue which he claimed was settled at the time. "It's always a little odd to talk about yourself-- but I have to tell you the confidence I have." SEE THE INTERVIEW HERE.

However, just six months later the company was in receivership and Feroce was facing a slew of new legal challenges including a lawsuit by the NFL’s Buffalo Bills who were seeking about $1 million from Feroce personally for non-payment of a marketing deal.

Max Wistow, suing on behalf of the receiver
The Battle Between the Lawyers

To date, hundreds of court documents have been filed by Wistow on behalf of the receiver and Sweeney, his firm and related parties.

Wistow has made a series of serious allegations against Sweeney, his firm Duffy and Sweeney, and others who were tied to a loan to Benrus back in 2016 while the company was still operating.

One of the most serious claims against Sweeney made in the suit is that Sweeney and others are guilty of a civil racketeer influenced and corruption organizations act violation (RICO) — a claim best known when applied by federal law enforcement officials in organized crime cases.

“All defendants collected or participated in the collection of an unlawful debt…,” according to the suit.

Wistow, on behalf of Gemma, also asserts Sweeney and the firm Duffy and Sweeney violated numerous legal ethical standards.

Wistow, on behalf of Gemma, is also seeking millions against Sweeney and the other parties. The suit claims damages in the amount of over $2 million and that treble damages should be applied plus “interest, costs, attorney fees, punitive damages, and such further relief as the court deems just and reasonable” — the total could exceed $7 million.

Sweeney Fires Back

Sweeney denies the claims in the suit vigorously.

“We recognize that the receiver’s role is to attempt to recover money from the wreckage of Mr. Feroce’s serial business failures for the benefit of the unpaid creditors.  Unfortunately, this new action by the receiver is a clear attempt to reframe a valid and beneficial 2016 purchase order agreement as “a usurious loan” and then add frivolous and unsupported allegations against Mr. Sweeney and his law firm.  Ironically, the funding in question actually saved old Benrus at the time and allowed it to make enough profit to survive another year,” Sarah Kennedy, as a spokesperson for PalmLake Group, LLC in an email to GoLocal on Friday.

Mike Sweeney, one of the top corporate attorneys in RI
“The facts are set forth in Palm Lake’s motion for leave to file a complaint against the Receiver dated May 16. By early 2016, old Benrus was admittedly on the brink of failure. Under Mr. Feroce’ mismanagement, the company had run out of cash and was unable to secure any credit or investment.  As a result, old Benrus was about to lose its only order for '2016 back-to-school' backpacks and go out of business,” said Kennedy.

Sweeney and Feroce’s relationship had gone back years. Sweeney and his firm had worked with Alex and Ani when Feroce worked at the company and with Benrus.

According to Kennedy, Sweeney and others stepped in to help provide financing via a loan to assist Benrus, “With three days remaining to send funds to a factory in Vietnam and after he admittedly exhausted all other potential funding sources, Feroce approached Mr. Sweeney for help. In a good faith effort to assist, PLG agreed to provide capital to old Benrus by purchasing open purchase orders and the rights to the future receipts from an order of watches and backpacks.” 

“The biggest irony is that PLG charged 15% over cost for such high-risk purchase order funding – the same 15% old Benrus’ former supplier charged before Feroce defaulted on that supply agreement,” added Kennedy.

“Over the past seven months, the receiver has discovered that there remains nothing of value to be salvaged from the debris of Feroce’s company.  With many creditors and no assets, the receiver has engaged a well-known contingency fee lawyer who charges no fee but takes 40% off the top of any recovery,” Kennedy said referring to Wistow’s role in the case.

“One month before the receivership was filed, Feroce admitted in a court filing under oath that the PLG agreement was not a loan, but a purchase order purchase. Feroce has not retreated from that admission.  Yet, the Receiver has ignored it. We will vigorously contest this attempt to revise the facts of the case and expect to prevail. Further, the targets of these actions by the Receiver intend to seek sanctions and their attorney’s fees,” claims Kennedy.

The lawsuits are now pending in front of Superior Court Judge Michael Silverstein — best known for overseeing the 38 Studios case.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Sweeney is a minor investor in GoLocal24, the parent company of GoLocalProv.com.


GoLocal Statewide Poll - Conducted by Harvard's Della Volpe - June, 2018

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.