Whitcomb: 6/10 Connector Conundrum; Send it Back to the Sacklers; Talking Up Tuna; Not-So-New NAFTA

Robert Whitcomb, Columnist

Whitcomb: 6/10 Connector Conundrum; Send it Back to the Sacklers; Talking Up Tuna; Not-So-New NAFTA

Robert Whitcomb, columnist
“The unceasing internal dialogue that afflicts every human being is not only deafening, it is blinding, and so miles and miles of perfection will fall away, unnoticed and unloved, before the universe snaps its fingers to awaken the sleepwalker. At first, all you see is a shaft of sunlight boring a hole through a wall of dense clouds – and that is striking enough. But then you follow the beam down to Earth, to a stand of sugar maples in which every leaf is a little too red, a little too orange, a little too gold. It’s a trick of light or God; these colors don’t exist in nature.’’ …

“Plans are made and destinations sought, but a flash of grace amid everyday despair cannot be scheduled or duplicated. Such moments may be fleeting, but they are never trivial.’’

From an editorial headlined “The eternal impermanence of autumn,’’ in The Concord (N.H.) Monitor. To read the whole thing, please hit this link:

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

 

There are some soft, still, damp mornings in October when time seems to stand still.

 

 “After witnessing nearly a decade of growth, most economists, investors, and captains of industry believed that the market’s natural direction was up. The beginning of the {1929} crash struck them not as a sign of financial doom, but as an opportunity for bargains. Following the first of the black days, The New York Times was full of positive predictions: ‘I have no fear of another comparable decline,’ said the president of the Equitable Trust Company.’’

 

-- From “The Worst Stock Tip in History,’’ in Time. Hit this link to read the whole piece:

 

It’s too bad that at this late date the Rhode Island Department of Transportation thinks it has to delay starting reconstruction work on the long-overdue Routes 6 and 10 Interchange project in Providence in order to do another study of lane shifts and closures. The new study might take a couple of months. Apparently, this has to do with trying to head off the sort of motorist outrage that accompanied the traffic jams caused by westbound-lane closures needed for repairs on the Route 195 Washington Bridge. But are these situations similar enough to warrant more delays and thus higher costs?


Condition of RI's economies ranks the state last in US
The traffic plan for the 6/10 project was approved in the spring. Are officials reinventing the wheel? Or was the earlier plan somehow clearly flawed? In any event, at least a few of the people reading this will be dead before the project is completed, perhaps in 2024.

 

The latest snag will almost certainly raise the total cost of the project, which is now estimated at $410 million. But that amount includes $162 million in Amtrak-related work: The interchange crosses the railroad’s Northeast Corridor line. Which makes me think of how nice it would be if there were more rail lines carrying commuters in and out of Providence and fewer polluting and space-taking cars. We can at least hope that the new 6/10 will be less ugly than the current one.

 

xxx
 

The Boston Herald, in an Oct. 2 article headlined “Choking on Growth,’’ reported on environmental experts warning about the downside of Boston’s booming economy and thus ever heavier traffic: more air pollution and thus more asthma.  Some of this is caused by the fact that there are more commuters, mostly driving alone, and some by such services as Lyft and Uber.

 

The solutions are obvious: more public transportation and more electrification of the transportation system, meaning more and better subway and street-car lines and more electric-powered private vehicles and places to charge them. To read the Herald piece, please hit this link:

 

Tuna Research
 

All hail the University of Rhode Island’s planned Greenfins Aquaculture Tuna Center of Excellence, whose mission is to create a sustainable yellowfin tuna aquaculture industry. The project includes a 125,000-gallon tank (which I’ve visited) at URI’s Graduate School of Oceanography, on the shore in Narragansett. The tank now has about a dozen tuna swimming in it.  Do fish suffer from claustrophobia?

 

This is still entirely a research program, focused on studying tuna reproduction. But the idea is to eventually create an important industry, with perhaps some of it based in our region. Presumably, other finfish species will be studied and, ultimately, farmed because of URI research. This is the sort of project in which the Ocean State should have a strong comparative advantage. URI continues to do great things.

 

Closed January 1, 2018
Ocean State Hospital Oversight

 

A reader wonders whether more of the oversight of health-care institutions in Rhode Island should be left to the Feds and much less to the state, which might not have the expertise and other resources to monitor hospitals, etc. Consider the demise of Memorial Hospital, in Pawtucket. The question comes in the wake of Boston-based Partners HealthCare’s plan to take over Care New England. Partners is considering absorbing Lifespan, too.

 

How About a Holiday Market?


Reading about the “Winter Market’’ on Boston’s often reviled City Hall Plaza last year got me thinking that a similar place for vendors (including of wine and beer) and such family-oriented activities as face-painting and clowns, and illuminated by holiday lights, might do well on Westminster Street, Kennedy Plaza or in Memorial Park, all in cozy downtown Providence, from a week or two before Thanksgiving through New Year’s.

 

Back in Boston, the City Hall Plaza event won’t happen this year because the windswept plaza is being renovated. However, the Boston Guardian reports that the city is looking into having a holiday season market and beer garden this year at glorious Copley Square, upon which many people from Greater Providence walk every day after alighting from the Back Bay Amtrak/MBTA station. It’s one of the world’s great public places, with the Boston Public Library and Trinity Church facing each other.

 

Raimondo sign opioid legislation, but refuses to return campaign donations
Give Back the Opiate Money

 

The re-election campaign of Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo would do well to return the $12,500 it has received from Jonathan Sackler and his wife, Mary Corson. Mr. Sackler is a scion of Purdue Pharma, which irresponsibly advertised its pain-killing and very highly addictive Oxycontin drug, to which many thousands of people became addicted; many died as a result. All too many harried physicians prescribed the drug, after hearing the pleas of patients complaining of  all manner of aches and pains.

 

The Raimondo campaign is very well-heeled and doesn’t need the money. Returning it would make a strong statement about the evil done by the intensely avaricious and status-obsessed  Sackler family, who control Purdue and made a fortune from peddling Oxycontin (and are famous for giving money to already rich institutions and then having their name plastered on their walls).

Rhode Island is one of a number of states suing Purdue for its leading role in the opioid crisis.

 

Nasty on the High Bench

 

I vaguely remembered from history courses: Noah Feldman notes that some of the greatest members of the U.S. Supreme Court have been nasty, vindictive people. Please hit this link:

 

 

 

Expensive New NAFTA

 

Trump desperately wanted a new trade pact with Canada before the mid-term elections so that he could claim that he had created a full-bodied replacement for the North American Free Trade Agreement comprising the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Much of his base hates NAFTA but they might be surprised by how little the new version, which he calls the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, would affect them at first and indeed might hurt them by shrinking economic growth over time.  But the base wants to believe in their leader, and the NAFTA 2 announcement will probably help the GOP at the polls next month. Indeed, our leader’s fans will follow their fuehrer at least into the beginning stages of the next recession. Just watch his campaign rallies in Red States, which are sort of sloppy combinations of Hitler’s Nuremberg rallies and a circus.

 

Still, the agreement is mostly just a tweaked NAFTA.  Of course, all trade pacts must eventually be reviewed, updated and/or killed as national and international economies change with technological, geopolitical and innumerable other changes. And one inevitable and welcome part of the new NAFTA is an update to reflect the new economic realities presented by the vast digital and telecommunications advances since NAFTA went into effect, in 1994. The Trump team apparently did a competent job on that; experts are still studying it. Lots of fine print!

 

The main effect on the general public of what Trump’s negotiating team came up with after weeks of nasty threats against those vicious Canadians would be higher consumer prices, which would be okay if they were more than offset by higher middle-class wages; it’s doubtful that they would be. The biggest U.S. beneficiaries -- at least for a while -- would be some autoworkers and dairy-industry people, before the treaty’s negative macroeconomic effects take their toll on them, too.

 

The pact would impose very complex new rules-of-origin and labor regulations, including on wages, with the aims of boosting North American production of vehicles and the pay of those who make them. But these rules would raise production costs, perhaps dramatically, which would make cars made in America less competitive in the world market and drive some production by European- and Asian-based companies out of North America. There would also be very high additional administrative costs to implement and manage the new deal.

 

As for the much ballyhooed dairy stuff (hello, Vermont!), The Wall Street Journal reports, “the U.S. share of the Canadian dairy market will rise by less than one percentage point.’’

Meanwhile, the pact doubles patent protection for some drugs, to 10 years, which would help ensure that U.S. drug prices remain by far the highest in the world. (The price of medical devices in the U.S. is also the world’s highest.) Interestingly, The Wall Street Journal, usually a Republican echo chamber, doesn’t like the proposed pact.

 

Consumers can at least be happy that the Trumpists didn’t put us into a full-scale protectionist war with our two adjacent neighbors that would have helped put us earlier into the recession that many economists think will start in 2020.

 

Now on to the growing trade war with China, whose recessionary effects Trump, et al., hope won’t kick in for a long time. Clearly, the president thinks that the Chinese will submit, to some degree, to U.S. demands because China, a very proud and powerful country, exports a lot more stuff to America than we do to China. But the leadership of the latter, a dictatorship, doesn’t have to worry nearly as much about the opinion of its subjects as do leaders of our plutocracy/semi-democracy.  The Chinese can be made to take a lot of pain in the furtherance of Beijing’s long-term goal of achieving world dominance.  They’re a lot more patient than attention-deficit-disordered Americans.

 

As much as Americans resent China’s relentless intellectual-property theft, cyber-attacks and other abuses, in an age of very low wage growth Americans have come to rely on a multitude of cheap Chinese goods. U.S. corporate leadership and big investors have little interest in sharing more of their winnings with American proles and peasants, so cheap (even after the new tariffs) stuff from China will have to suffice for now. But I suspect that U.S. consumers will get ornery when those prices start to surge along with the tariffs.

 

Protecting the GOP Religion Industrial Complex


Katherine Franke, who helps run the Public Rights/Private Conscience Project at Columbia University, had a nice piece on the hypocrisy of the Trump administration campaign for “religious freedom.’’ What this campaign comes down to is promoting political causes that appeal to the Republican “base.’’

 

She writes in The Washington Post:

“You can count on the government’s support if you’re a cake baker who considers same-sex marriage to be an abomination, or a nun who believes that contraception is murder, or a school administrator whose faith tells him that a person’s sex is fixed by God at birth. In these cases, Justice Department lawyers will show up like the cavalry, ready to go down fighting.

 

“But not so much for Unitarians, whose faith drives them to leave water and food in the desert for migrants who will die without help. Or Catholic activists who believe that nuclear weapons are a death pact with the devil. Or the ‘Adorers,’ who oppose the building of a gas pipeline on their property. Or Muslims in almost any context.’’  (Or peacenik Quakers.)

“When you pay close attention to the litigation strategy pursued by the federal government’s lawyers, what you see is that this administration is not committed to an overarching principle of religious liberty…. Like so much of the current political climate under President Trump, the administration is not defending a neutral constitutional principle — religious liberty — for all people, but rather only for those who share the administration’s political perspective.’’

This is being pushed by rich evangelical con men on TV, radio and the Internet, who have taken over much of the “Evangelical Movement’’ and who are some of the reasons why the tax-deductibility of money sent to many purportedly “religious institutions’’ (including the Scientology scam) should be eliminated. All too many of them are political organizations or just money-making schemes.

 

To read Ms. Frank’s piece, please hit this link:

 

Government Meddling in Corporate Boards

 

California Gov. Jerry Brown just signed a bill requiring companies with their main executive offices in the state (not quite sure what that means) to have at least one woman on their boards by the end of next year. And by 2021, such companies must have at least two or three women directors, depending on their size. Failure to comply will force fines of $100,000 to $300,000.

 

What a bad law! Companies’ shareholders, which include many women, should determine the composition of boards, not government, which should stick to maintaining government services and physical infrastructure. This statute is a gross and inefficient intrusion into the private sector. The companies know their needs a lot more than government. Most recognize that going forward, it’s advantageous to have more diversity on their boards.
 

Defederalize the Abortion Issue

 

The abortion issue is, of course, an incendiary religious and political controversy long used by the GOP’s right wing to grab many voters who might have otherwise voted against the party on socio-economic grounds. If Roe v Wade, which created a federal “right ‘’to abortion, were overturned and abortion law sent back to the states, where such domestic law usually resides, the Democrats would be in a position to win more federal offices. Of course, some states would ban the procedure but many states would protect it.

 

Trump supporters
Unhappy but Lazy

 

With the mid-term elections looming, some prophets predict that many young voters, outraged by Trump, will troop off to the polls and spend an exhausting 20 minutes or so voting. Don’t bet on it! Whatever the rhetoric, most Americans are remarkably slothful in fulfilling their voluntary responsibilities as citizens. I don’t see that changing much.

 

Nor do I see a falloff in the numbers of middle-age and older white men with above median income voting for Trump-backing pols.  Combine that with ruthless Republican gerrymandering and voter-suppression laws and regulations in some states, and you see a steep uphill battle for Democrats in trying to take control of Congress. The Democrats just aren’t nearly as tough as the Republicans have been since the ‘80s.

 

Note that in the 2014 mid-terms only 12 percent of college students bothered to vote; you might think that this would be an engaged group.

 

The mid-term elections next month will be among the most important in U.S. history so far.

 

But then, knowledge of American history has been rapidly shrinking among most Americans the last couple of decades.  Ignorance swells along with social media.

 

Maybe having schools resume teaching civics would help….
 

 

The Monetization of the White House

 

The Obamas would set a nice example of dignity and decorum if they stopped running around as the Clintons did trying to make as much money as they could off their White House fame. The Obamas’ current money chase, which follows a low-key and honest time in the White House, sets a bad example in a society that is all-too materialistic, and it tends to lower citizens’ respect for such public service.  Then there’s the Trumps….

 

At least the Clintons and Obama, unlike the Trumps, have given a lot of money to charities.

 

Making a killing off the White House really got cooking in the ‘80s and continues to lower the esteem in which the presidency is held.

 

Along those lines, read Enough: True Measures of Money, Business, and Life, by mutual-fund mogul John C.  Bogle. As one reviewer noted: “This unique book examines what it truly means to have ‘enough’ in  a world increasingly focused on status and score-keeping.’’

 

Meanwhile, if you think that the Trumps’ vast tax evasions are admirably clever, remember that you have had to make up some of the taxes they didn’t pay. And that the entire federal income-tax structure hugely favors those whose wealth is mostly in the form of  “investments’’ rather than wages. That makes it  easy for multigenerational crooks like the Trumps to send us law-abiding folks their bills.

 

Trapped in World War I

 

David Stevenson’s brilliant study of the World War I year lays out how difficult it can be to stop a war, no matter how calamitous, when the belligerents had dug themselves into blood-filled military and diplomatic traps. 1917: War, Peace & Revolution is, as Yale history Prof. Jay Winter says, ‘’ history as tragedy, with hubris bringing down those who thought they could master the destructive forces of the Great War.’’ I found the narrative of the U.S. entry into the war particularly surprising.


The 50 Greatest Living Rhode Islanders

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.